What's new

Angry India tells US 'times have changed' after diplomat spat

why US state department is not helping US justice department ???

whay US sttae department is making it difficult for US hjustice department ???

Isn't there any communication between departments of 'Big-mouth' US goverment ???


US justice department is ensure proper procedure to enforce, define and implement US law. US state department oversee the function of the nation, both intertwine but regard to legal process both are separate entity.
 
.
Per jury was a charge brought on Clinton, he wasn't convict of the charge, US justice system did force a sitting president to answer all the charge brought to him. What more you want the US justice system to do. He won the case, case closed.





Your believe have nothing to do with how justice being serve in the court of law. Clinton faced his charge in court and he won, he didn't commit any per jury or lie under oaths.


Go on defending ....whole world knows Clinton was guilty and whole world recognise the fact that Clinton was let off the hook because US judiciary did not want to creat history to punish sitting President and tarnish the presidency all the more ( which was already done by Bill clinton )

This fact speaks volumes about US system that Bill clintons crime went unpunsihed ....

Despite overwhelming evidence US Judiciary hid being technicalities of legal jargon to let the US president get away without any punishment

The biggest mockery of US system ....


Go on and make fool of yourself on this forum by defending even in this instance ...

People will judge you ....
Remember people always judge you ...

She would need to go through a process as she has no diplomatic immunity, only consulate immunity. Lets hope that she has good representation and all truth are out.

She has full diplomatic immunity now...
 
. .
Go on defending ....whole world knows Clinton was guilty and whole world recognise the fact that Clinton was let off the hook because US judiciary did not want to creat history to punish sitting President and tarnish the presidency all the more ( which was already done by Bill clinton )

This fact speaks volumes about US system that Bill clintons crime went unpunsihed ....

Despite overwhelming evidence US Judiciary hid being technicalities of legal jargon to let the US president get away without any punishment

The biggest mockery of US system ....


Go on and make fool of yourself on this forum by defending even in this instance ...



People will judge you ....
Remember people always judge you ...



She has full diplomatic immunity now...




Wasn't Nixon forced to resigned his post after he violated US law? Clinton wasn't a 1st president to face justice in US court.
 
.
She would need to go through a process as she has no diplomatic immunity, only consulate immunity. Lets hope that she has good representation and all truth are out.


well frankly speaking when Bill clinton screwed Monica lewenski in office ...it is US system and US presidency that he was screwing ....

and whole US system conjured with him to do that and get away with it ....


whole world has watched this drama of US sense of Justice very closely ....

People are not idiot ... No matter you guys basically let a serial sex offender , liar to continue as your president !!!

Serves well for you guys ....as goes the subject so does the king !!!
 
.
Clinton not just beat the per jury in court but he also beat the impeachment procedure held by the hell bent Republican party wanted to take him down. Clinton declared a winner on both front.
 
.
But she committed the crime while she didn't have diplomatic immunity as the immunity is not retroactive.

Even Turk Prince who committed the crime did not have immunity ...which was granted to him later and made retro-active . something which florida court accepted !


US is off course known for double standards ....!!! ( No doubt about that )
 
.
well frankly speaking when Bill clinton screwed Monica lewenski in office ...it is US system and US presidency that he was screwing ....

and whole US system conjured with him to do that and get away with it ....


whole world has watched this drama of US sense of Justice very closely ....

People are not idiot ... No matter you guys basically let a serial sex offender , liar to continue as your president !!!

Serves well for you guys ....as goes the subject so does the king !!!



Your or the people perception need to be define in court, Clinton outwit and able to defend his definition in court, result of not guilty on all counts.

Even Turk Prince who committed the crime did not have immunity ...which was granted to him later and made retro-active . something which florida court accepted !


US is off course known for double standards ....!!! ( No doubt about that )



All the criminal case depend on the US court to come up with final decision. That all it matter.
 
.
Clinton not just beat the per jury in court but he also beat the impeachment procedure held by the hell bent Republican party wanted to take him down. Clinton declared a winner on both front.

So basically a serial sex offender and a liar won in US court as well as senate ....good for you guys !!!

You must rejoice over robustness of your system ....
 
.
So basically a serial sex offender and a liar won in US court as well as senate ....good for you guys !!!

You must rejoice over robustness of your system ....



US justice system have the due process for any defendant to defend himself or herself in court. Impartial justice provide to everyone in the US.
 
.
Your or the people perception need to be define in court, Clinton outwit and able to defend his definition in court, result of not guilty on all counts.

All the criminal case depend on the US court to come up with final decision. That all it matter.

You are stupid enough to miss the vital points . Clinton got away not because he won ....but because Paula Jones agreed for out of court settlement to drop chanrges ....and Monica Lewenski was magnanimous enough not to press charges of sexual misconduct ...

US justice system have the due process for any defendant to defend himself or herself in court. Impartial justice provide to everyone in the US.
Partiality of US system was widely demontrated when sex offenders like Clinton got away unscathed...

Simply because courts went slack about the overwhelming evidence ...and took help of technicalities , legal jargon

Here in this instance US judiciary was hand in glove with criminal to sabotage the law and truth ....
 
.
You are stupid enough to miss the vital points . Clinton got away not because he won ....but because Paula Jones agreed for out of court settlement to drop chanrges ....and Monica Lewenski was magnanimous enough not to press charges of sexual misconduct ...


Victim withdraw the charge against defendant, US D.A have nothing to charge the defendant with except D.A can pursue the charge against the defendant if there hard evident to convince the D.A to do so.

Partiality of US system was widely demontrated when sex offenders like Clinton got away unscathed...

Simply because courts went slack about the overwhelming evidence ...and took help of technicalities , legal jargon

Here in this instance US judiciary was hand in glove with criminal to sabotage the law and truth ....



How can you stated US court bias toward Clinton when the victim as you stated withdraw all the charge from the D.A.
 
.
How can you stated US court bias toward Clinton when the victim as you stated withdraw all the charge from the D.A.

well the US court and the judge Sussane Weber Wright agreed with Clinton and team's interpretation of Sexual relations ....Basically bill clinton maintained that he 'did' nothing and that he was just 'serviced'

Judged lapped up his story ....refusing to see the Blue- dress with Clinton's 'seed' on it - which could not have come had Clinton 'done' nothing ....

The accused withdraw charge later ....when Clinton managed to muscle out the agreement based on handsome compensation ....

why did not US prosecution and court did not continue the case despite accused having withdrawan the case ?



if in current case involving Indian diplomat the maid withdraws the case will prosecution close the case ???
 
.
well the US court and the judge Sussane Weber Wright agreed with Clinton and team's interpretation of Sexual relations ....Basically bill clinton maintained that he 'did' nothing and that he was just 'serviced'

Judged lapped up his story ....refusing to see the Blue- dress with Clinton's 'seed' on it - which could not have come had Clinton 'done' nothing ....

The accused withdraw charge later ....when Clinton managed to muscle out the agreement based on handsome compensation ....

why did not US prosecution and court did not continue the case despite accused having withdrawan the case ?


if in current case involving Indian diplomat the maid withdraws the case will prosecution close the case ???



Everything you mention are just after the fact, Clinton not guilty of any crime, everything just conjecture from this point. If a nanny decide to withdraw her charge, D.A office can decide to drop the case or continue to pursue the case if there are hard evident point to it. A defendant was charged with multiple counts, the serious charge were human trafficking and visa fraud. Without a nanny allegation, US D.A still pursue other charges.
 
. .
Back
Top Bottom