I know that. Point is, india is
significantly worse for its minorities than Pakistan. Pakistan is worse than US, and so on.
Also, your reasoning that temple was closed for 72 years because Pakistan is intolerant is also false. As I told you, Sialkot had no hindus left after partition....hence temple was closed (since no worshippers). But it is our tolerance that we did not demolished the closed temple. We kept it and maintained it. Now Hindu community has established itself again in the region (thanks to birth rates and migration from surrounding areas to industrial city of Sialkot)---so the temple is opened for worship.
Pakistan has
never destroyed any major Hindu temples. Whereas, india has destroyed Babri Masjid and the party responsible for that (BJP) is in power, led by Modi----a man under whom the largest massacre of Muslims happened with thousands killed and even more Muslim women raped.
That's india for you. Pakistan is far, far, far better as such thing will NEVER happen in Pakistan.
Lol, you admitted it yourself that you are making stuff up
What's your source? Vedicmyths.com????
Btw, Babri Masjid should be rebuilt on the same spot, while hindus can built their temple adjacent to it on the same land (just like many Mosques are built adjacent to temples in india). Win-win....but extremists hindus won't agree to this peaceful and tolerance-based solution.