What's new

Ancient Arabian Stones Hint at How Humans Migrated Out of Africa

al-Hasani

ELITE MEMBER
Joined
Feb 1, 2013
Messages
14,060
Reaction score
43
Country
Saudi Arabia
Location
Denmark
Ancient Arabian Stones Hint at How Humans Migrated Out of Africa
By Charles Q. Choi, Live Science Contributor | August 26, 2014 12:01pm ET

Ancient stone artifacts recently excavated from Saudi Arabia possess similarities to items of about the same age in Africa — a discovery that could provide clues to how humans dispersed out of Africa, researchers say.

Modern humans originated about 200,000 years ago in Africa. However, scientists have long debated when and how the modern human lineage spread out of Africa.

"Understanding how we originated and colonized the world remains one of the most fascinating and enduring questions, because it is our story as humans," said lead study author Eleanor Scerri, an archaeologist at the University of Bordeaux in France.

Previous research had suggested that the exodus from Africa started between 70,000 and 40,000 years ago. However, a genetic analysis reported in April hinted that modern humans might have begun their march across the globe as early as 130,000 years ago, and continued their expansion out of Africa in multiple waves.

In addition, stone artifacts recently unearthed in the Arabian Desert date to at least 100,000 years ago. This could be evidence of an early modern-human exodus out of Africa, scientists say. However, it's possible that these artifacts weren't created by modern humans; a number of now-extinct human lineages existed outside Africa before or at the same time when modern humans migrated there. For instance, the Neanderthals, the closest known extinct relatives of modern humans, lived in both Europe and Asia around that time. [See Images of Our Closest Human Ancestor]

To help shed light on the role the Arabian Peninsula might have played in the history of modern humans, scientists compared stone artifacts recently excavated from three sites in the Jubbah lake basin in northern Saudi Arabia with items from northeast Africa excavated in the 1960s. Both sets of artifacts were 70,000 to 125,000 years old. Back then, the areas that are now the Arabian and Sahara deserts were far more hospitable places to live than they are now, which could have made it easier for modern humans and related lineages to migrate out of Africa.

"Far from being a desert, the Arabian Peninsula between 130,000 and 75,000 years ago was a patchwork of grasslands and savanna environments, featuring extensive river networks running through the interior," Scerri said.

The northeast African stone tools the researchers analyzed were similar to ones previously found near modern-human skeletons. The scientists found that stone artifacts at two of the three Arabian sites were "extremely similar" to the northeast African stone tools, Scerri told Live Science. At the very least, Scerri said, this finding suggests that there was some level of interaction between the groups in Africa and those in the Arabian Peninsula, and might hint that these Arabian tools were made by modern humans.

Surprisingly, Scerri said, tools from the third Arabian site the researchers analyzed were "completely different." "This shows that there was a number of different tool-making traditions in northern Arabia during this time, often in very close proximity to each other," she said.

One possible explanation for these differences is that the artifacts were made by different human lineages. Future research needs to uncover skeletal remains with ancient tools unearthed from the Arabian Peninsula to help solve this mystery, Scerri noted. Unless skeletal remains are found near such artifacts, it will remain uncertain whether modern humans or a different human lineage might have made them.

"It seems likely that there were multiple dispersals into the Arabian Peninsula from Africa, some possibly very early in the history of Homo sapiens," Scerri said. "It also seems likely that there may have been multiple dispersals into this region from other parts of Eurasia. These features are what make the Arabian Peninsula so interesting."

Ancient migrants out of Africa and from Eurasia might have encountered a number of different populations in the Arabian Peninsula, Scerri said. Some of these groups may have adapted to their environment more than others had, which raises the intriguing question: "Did the exchange of genes and knowledge between such groups contribute to our ultimate success as a species?" Scerri said.

The scientists detailed their findings online Aug. 8 in the Journal of Human Evolution.

Follow us @livescience, Facebook & Google+. Original article on Live Science.

Ancient Arabian Stones Hint at How Humans Migrated Out of Africa

@Arabian Legend @JUBA @Yzd Khalifa @BLACKEAGLE @Mosamania @Full Moon @Bubblegum Crisis @Hadbani @Hazzy997 @burning_phoneix @Awadd @Mahmoud_EGY @Frogman @agentny17 @Dino R. @ebray @Belew_Kelew @Tihamah etc.
 
.
If is true, this explains why some of the Arab brothers are so big ;)
 
.
If is true, this explains why some of the Arab brothers are so big ;)

Arabians are indeed among the tallest people on earth but I don't see how that thread has anything to do with that fact.

The point that the thread is trying to make, which has been well-known for a long time, is the crucial place in ancient human history and history as a whole of the Arabian Peninsula.

Given the fact that almost nothing, as in nothing, has been excavated and many treasures are waiting to be explored, we will only become wiser. Just like those few new findings that this article describes.


 
Last edited:
.
I don't Buy it, It's the theory of darwin and they want to prove it by any means to discredit Adam and Eve and the creationists.
 
. .
I don't Buy it, It's the theory of darwin and they want to prove it by any means to discredit Adam and Eve and the creationists.

How is this story conflicting? Adam and Eve might have lived in Africa and from there on the descendants of Adam and Eve (the two earliest humans) spread elsewhere.

The other humanoid looking people or whatever might as well be long ago extinct primates that resembled humanoids.

I don't see anything conflicting here.

Anyway whatever it is then the Arabian Peninsula is the oldest inhabited place on earth after Eastern Africa/Horn of Africa and the Arabian Peninsula is an important region to understand the earliest human migrations and the earliest human history etc.
 
.
How is this story conflicting? Adam and Eve might have lived in Africa and from there on the descendants of Adam and Eve (the two earliest humans) spread elsewhere.

The other humanoid looking people or whatever might as well be long ago extinct primates that resembled humanoids.

I don't see anything conflicting here.

Anyway whatever it is then the Arabian Peninsula is the oldest inhabited place on earth after Eastern Africa/Horn of Africa and the Arabian Peninsula is an important region to understand the earliest human migrations and the earliest human history etc.

Adam and Eve met near Mecca or generally in the arabian peninsula that is what the prophet PBUH told us after they were descended from heaven one near India and the other in modern day turkey, from there they could've gone to the horn/east africa as the red sea was narrower and was linked with land passages especially where yemen and Eritrea'djbouti meet. That is why the Afro-Asiatic Languages is called the erythrean Language group because it originated or split in the area of west saudia arabia and east africa around the basin of the red sea today.

The arabian peninsula and the horn of africa were almost one land apart from a large lake which became sea today which is the red sea. so back then arabian peninsula would look like an extension of africa and a big lake in the middle of where the red sea is today.

There was no other humaniod people back then, the oldest ancient people alive today are the san people in southern africa and according to DNA their genetic results confirms that they split from the source first and the rest of humanity share another common dna, which could mean that either that the san people where the first to migrate after noah's arc settled and didn't mix with other population for the last 30,000 years or so , or it could also mean that they are the desendent of Kane (Qabeel tribe) who were working the fields and moved afar away, and the rest of us are through Abel (Habeel) and Noah A.S desendents hence the San DNA prove that we only share with them the source (adam) Dna but not the secondary main split (Noah). But allah knows best.

The problem with the evolution theory is todate there isn't the material evidence of this theory, they have been searching in vain for the last 100-150 years, the idea is once they plant the idea of evolving humans and the thoery of 200,000 years homo-sapiens transformation and you become convince of it it will be easier for them to make you question the validity of adam and eve being the father and mother of humanity. I just think it's a drive to counter many religion and it main core and fundemental of god creation to humans.
 
.

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom