ANALYSIS-Anti-Pakistan wave helps Modi salvage some votes from India's unhappy farms

[Taimoor Khan]

So let me get it straight, the slap Modi India received by Pakistan in the shape of Pakistani surgical strikes and shooting down of two IAF jets , that is not even considered by Indian voters?

 

[Republic]

I am not against true secularism. But this fake secularism in India which means Muslims have more rights and dictate the terms.
Indians say that India is a secular country because of a Hindu majority. I beg to differ. It's because of the Muslim minority.

It is impossible for India to be a truly secular nation with Muslims in it.

Abdul Kalam Azad is hailed as a secular Muslim. But in reality he was a bigoted orthodox Muslim. He did not let Nehru implement an uniform civil code. Nehru with his greed for Muslims votes let Muslims dictate the terms. Muslims think they us a favour by staying in India. They know their political importance hence continue you to blackmail secular parties.

This is why I say India can never be truly egalitarian with Muslims in it. Maybe if they are disenfranchised then it's possible. But even your RSS has no courage to do it.

They will create a pseudo secular Hindu rashtra and Muslim appeasement will continue as usual.

If these stupid sanghis instead of murdering Gandhi, believing in impractical ideas such as Akhand Bharat, had accepted two nations theory. There would have been no Muslims in India.

But like @Republic you too @Nityam are blinded by ideological bias to see the reality.

Good God ! pray tell me what is my ideology ?? Honestly, I want to know.

And only Azad was not against common civil code. Most of the Hindu politicians and most importantly their financing Baniyas were against it. Because they didn't want to shun away their previlage like the concept of HUD family. Only because of these Baniyas Modi had to bring only tripal talaq ordinance instead of common civil code.
That's all I could infer with my limited understanding. Instead of further debating the issue, I would like to respect your opinion also and move on.

Thanks.

 

[atya]

Let nature take it course. The unwanted will cease to exist.

Not different from whats happening in Africa and Middle east.


If these stupid Indian politicians including Sanghi ones had imposed forced sterilization and family planning. This all could be avoided.

I mean if you let a particular community have 4 wives and dozens of children in an already overpopulated and impoverished country. What would you expect?;

It's rare for someone to have more than one wife even in Pakistan

 

[Nilu Pule]

Good God ! pray tell me what is my ideology ?? Honestly, I want to know.

And only Azad was not against common civil code. Most of the Hindu politicians and most importantly their financing Baniyas were against it. Because they didn't want to shun away their previlage like the concept of HUD family. Only because of these Baniyas Modi had to bring only tripal talaq ordinance instead of common civil code.
That's all I could infer with my limited understanding. Instead of further debating the issue, I would like to respect your opinion also and move on.

Thanks.

Both Congress and the BJP are brahman bania parties.

Brahmin and Banias let Muslims dictate the terms and let others suffer.

Yes Bania entrepreneurs wanted Muslims to stay so they could profit off them by selling their products.

 

[Republic]

Both Congress and the BJP are brahman bania parties.

Brahmin and Banias let Muslims dictate the terms and let others suffer.

Exactly my point.

Yes Bania entrepreneurs wanted Muslims to stay so they could profit off them by selling their products.

Ye kuchh jiyada hi ho gaya.

 

[Nilu Pule]

Ye kuchh jiyada hi ho gaya.

It's true. Muslim league did most violence in bengal during direct action day. Why there was no total population exchange?

Marwaris of Bengal did not want it. Marwaris were not even at the receiving end of the violence. If you think about it will all make sense.

 

[Kambojaric]

War + Riots will lay the foundation of a Hindu Rashtra.

Jinnah will finally rest in grave as two nation theory will be vindicated after so many years.

1940 to 2019 such a long time

In the grand scheme of history it absolutely is not. People from 1940 are still living i.e. this is a timespan of one lifetime. Jinnah was a visionary. He foresaw that in an independent India minorities would be at the mercy of the majority. The majority would be benevolent towards the minorities when the socio-economic situation was stable. When things went down the drain however it is always the minorities that pay case in point being the Jews in Germany post the Wall Street Crash.

 

[Nilu Pule]

In the grand scheme of history it absolutely is not. People from 1940 are still living i.e. this is a timespan of one lifetime. Jinnah was a visionary. He foresaw that in an independent India minorities would be at the mercy of the majority. The majority would be benevolent towards the minorities when the socio-economic situation was stable. When things went down the drain however it is always the minorities that pay case in point being the Jews in Germany post the Wall Street Crash.

Everyone else except Muslims were losers after partition.

Muslims got 3 countries. How many did others get?

I for one can I attest to the fact that Muslims and non Muslims cannot co exist. Muslims with their higher birth rates and aggressive proselytization, and their demands for special treatment will swallow everyone else.

Jinnah for me is a messiah. If he was accepted by non muslims. We would have peace in this region

 

[maximuswarrior]

This goes to that Modi is not the only problem. Many Indians including farmers and other segments of society too are full of hate. A society that feeds off hatred has little to no future.

 

[Pakistani E]

I mean if you let a particular community have 4 wives and dozens of children in an already overpopulated and impoverished country. What would you expect?;

How many Muslims in India have 4 wives? Genuine question.

 

[Nilu Pule]

How many Muslims in India have 4 wives? Genuine question.

I read in some report that's 5 percent.

But that's not the point. They should not be allowed to have 4 wives in a secular country.

 

[Nityam]

I am not against true secularism. But this fake secularism in India which means Muslims have more rights and dictate the terms.
Indians say that India is a secular country because of a Hindu majority. I beg to differ. It's because of the Muslim minority.

It is impossible for India to be a truly secular nation with Muslims in it.

Abdul Kalam Azad is hailed as a secular Muslim. But in reality he was a bigoted orthodox Muslim. He did not let Nehru implement an uniform civil code. Nehru with his greed for Muslims votes let Muslims dictate the terms. Muslims think they us a favour by staying in India. They know their political importance hence continue you to blackmail secular parties.

You mean to say the Minority muslims in dictate the terms of Engagement and will dictate the definition of "secularism" ?

Only that is not true.

The damage was done by CONgress which continued to british policy of divide and rule to maintain political power. Muslims were just as much the victim as rest of us. After all a fractured and poor India unable to fulfill its social contracts, hurts all of us the same.

CONgress political strategy of Salami Slicing Indian society for political gains is what mutated the idea of "secularism".

You yourself is a product of this social engineering, mouthing their slogans of caste/linguistic divide as part of your agenda.

The counter to this salami slicing strategy is the Unifying strategy known as "Hindutva" which seeks a cultural union of our society.

This is why I say India can never be truly egalitarian with Muslims in it. Maybe if they are disenfranchised then it's possible. But even your RSS has no courage to do it.

If RSS has no courage, then why don't your Dalit Panther or the Party of your choice do it ?

What is stopping your enlightened revolution ?

They will create a pseudo secular Hindu rashtra and Muslim appeasement will continue as usual.

If these stupid sanghis instead of murdering Gandhi, believing in impractical ideas such as Akhand Bharat, had accepted two nations theory. There would have been no Muslims in India.

But like @Republic you too @Nityam are blinded by ideological bias to see the reality.
@jamahir @fitpOsitive

Ambedkar had asked for population exchange, it was Nehru who opposed it.

RSS a.k.a "Sanghis" had no role either way.

Akhand Bharat was an Idea that could have been implemented in 1947, not any more when the societies have grown so different. No one desires it anymore.

I read in some report that's 5 percent.

But that's not the point. They should not be allowed to have 4 wives in a secular country.

Actually everybody should be free to have multiple wives and husbands in a truly free country.

I fail to see why govt. needs to interfere in personal relationships except when it comes to property division and distribution of wealth among family members.

Good God ! pray tell me what is my ideology ?? Honestly, I want to know.

And only Azad was not against common civil code. Most of the Hindu politicians and most importantly their financing Baniyas were against it. Because they didn't want to shun away their previlage like the concept of HUD family. Only because of these Baniyas Modi had to bring only tripal talaq ordinance instead of common civil code.
That's all I could infer with my limited understanding. Instead of further debating the issue, I would like to respect your opinion also and move on.

Thanks.

LOL.

What is the relationship between Common Civil Code and HUD ?

It was BR Ambedkar who pushed for the Common civil code. The ONLY people who opposed it were the muslims.