What's new

AN OPEN LETTER TO RAMEEZ RAJA

.
She is daughter of Mujib and Bangladeshi's are the same people who followed Mujib's cal for Bangali identity rather than Pakistani Muslim identity, and these are the same people who blame us for raping 30 million of their women.....these are the same people who stabbed us in the back with the help of bharti hindus and I will NEVER trust them

Some of mujib and Haseena followers are ridiculous but I believe it's not the whole population.
 
.
some followers couldn't have and didn't create Bangladesh, it was all of them.

I had seen 71 war with my own eyes, my father was in PN so we used to live in a "Naval setup" and very close to our homes (across our play ground) were some ( about 8/10) PAF quarters for low level PAF employees, most of them Bangalis, and while Karachi oil terminal was under attack by indian fighters (we were all observing blackout) all the lights in PAF quarters occupied by Bangalis were lit, my elder brothers (21 & 16 at that time) went in armed with guns to tackle them, all quarters were locked with no one inside. so my brothers broke the doors and took out main fuses and brought them back home. There was an attack very close to our home, two bombs landed inside boundary wall of Agha Khan's honey moon lodge near Masjid Tooba, my brother brought two large pieces of those bombs home, which my uncle in PAF took away.

Some of mujib and Haseena followers are ridiculous but I believe it's not the whole population.
 
.
hese are the same people who stabbed us in the back with the help of bharti hindus

I never understand fascination u people have for 'Hindus' or a particular religion. The person who lead India in 71 was married to a Parsi, then Indian army chief and architect of creation of Bangladesh was a Jew and the person in presence of whom Niazi signed surrender documents was a Sikh. India is very much beyond 'Hindu' :lol:
 
.
He is actually implying the language movement of Bengalis against Urdu. Seems like his agony with BD is age old.

If Bangladeshis want to take revenge then they should invite Ramiz Raja for commentry along with Sir Athar Ali Khan :yahoo:

I never understand fascination u people have for 'Hindus' or a particular religion. The person who lead India in 71 was married to a Parsi, then Indian army chief and architect of creation of Bangladesh was a Jew and the person in presence of whom Niazi signed surrender documents was a Sikh. India is very much beyond 'Hindu' :lol:
Their obsession for religion will take them down one day :drag:
 
.
some followers couldn't have and didn't create Bangladesh, it was all of them.

I had seen 71 war with my own eyes, my father was in PN so we used to live in a "Naval setup" and very close to our homes (across our play ground) were some ( about 8/10) PAF quarters for low level PAF employees, most of them Bangalis, and while Karachi oil terminal was under attack by indian fighters (we were all observing blackout) all the lights in PAF quarters occupied by Bangalis were lit, my elder brothers (21 & 16 at that time) went in armed with guns to tackle them, all quarters were locked with no one inside. so my brothers broke the doors and took out main fuses and brought them back home. There was an attack very close to our home, two bombs landed inside boundary wall of Agha Khan's honey moon lodge near Masjid Tooba, my brother brought two large pieces of those bombs home, which my uncle in PAF took away.

some followers couldn't have and didn't create Bangladesh, it was all of them.
Yes, some followers could create Bangladesh and they successfully did it. And no, it was not all of the then E. Pakistani Bengalis that knew the game plan, infect not even one in a thousand but the cessation was inevitable as it was decided by the creator of INDO-PAK even before 1947. BTW, did you know that Lord MT. Batten stated that united PAK wouldn't last more than 25 yrs.? Nehru also commented in the same line that W. PAK could last but the East's one didn't have any chance to stay as independent. And, wasn’t his daughter pioneered it? Now, do U see on how 100 yrs long scheme of the King-Queen of Hindutavya walas is gradually materializing? And UR brother's story was only relevant to the situation of Bengali military-officials stayed at W.PAK at that time, thanks.

Finally, E. PAK got separated due to its geographic proximity, the rest of the causes were secondary, tertiary etc. For example, IND has been scheming to segregate Baluchis from other Pakistanis at around the same time that has done E. Pakistanis but why hasn't it succeeded yet?
 
Last edited:
.
Well that one might never come, but you should really focus on present as your hindutva goons are very much active taking you down to the dark Vedic times

Their obsession for religion will take them down one day :drag:

Geographic proximity may have played a minor role but the seed of racism was already there which is exemplified by the fact that during Quaid-e-Azams visit of Dhaka university in March 48 when Quaid announced that Urdu would be Pakistan's official language, then the same Mujib-ur-Rahman, then a student challenged Quaid and asked why Urdu, why not Bangla?


Yes, some followers could create Bangladesh and they successfully did it. And no, it was not all of the then E. Pakistani Bengalis that knew the game plan, infect not even one in a thousand but the cessation was inevitable as it was decided by the creator of INDO-PAK even before 1947. BTW, did you know that Lord MT. Batten stated that united PAK wouldn't last more than 25 yrs.? Nehru also commented in the same line that W. PAK could last but the East's one didn't have any chance to stay as independent. And, wasn’t his daughter pioneered it? Now, do U see on how 100 yrs long scheme of the King-Queen of Hindutavya walas is gradually materializing? And UR brother's story was only relevant to the situation of Bengali military-officials stayed at W.PAK at that time, thanks.

Finally, E. PAK got separated due to its geographic proximity, the rest of the causes were secondary, tertiary etc. For example, IND has been scheming to segregate Baluchis from other Pakistanis at around the same time that has done E. Pakistanis but why hasn't it succeeded yet?
 
.
Well that one might never come, but you should really focus on present as your hindutva goons are very much active taking you down to the dark Vedic times

Geographic proximity may have played a minor role but the seed of racism was already there which is exemplified by the fact that during Quaid-e-Azams visit of Dhaka university in March 48 when Quaid announced that Urdu would be Pakistan's official language, then the same Mujib-ur-Rahman, then a student challenged Quaid and asked why Urdu, why not Bangla?
One or two goons out of 1000 cant do shit....but when the entire race thinks radically it sure becomes a matter of concern

I am not gonna argue with you on this one bcuz the previous comment was written with a goodwill and without any malicious intent
 
. .
.
Dear Rameez,

Take my greetings from Bangladesh. I am not sure if you will ever get a chance to read this. If ever, I just hope you will take this in good spirit. I have been following cricket for years and am quite familiar with your style both as a player and commentator. I must admit you speak good English but I have reasons to doubt whether your commentary is as good as your English.

I know you are not a great fan of the Bangladesh cricket team. For years you have ridiculed Bangladeshi players knowingly or unknowingly. I don’t want to go into the details. You are perhaps aware of your effigies being burnt in many parts of Bangladesh after your sarcastic comments over Bangladesh in general and Bangladesh cricket team in particular during the World Cup 2015.

I am not sitting in judgment if the fans did the right thing or wrong by taking some of your comments seriously. I was in the press box in Canberra during Bangladesh’s opening World Cup match against Afghanistan. From the very beginning of match, you, as a commentator, tried to give an impression that Bangladesh were scared of facing Afghanistan.

In the press box we were not allowed to listen to commentary. So I could not get a first hand idea of what you were saying. I came to know about your disparaging remarks only after seeing the overwhelming reaction of fans on social media.

However, this is not the case in the ongoing Pakistan Super League. I am watching it from a distance like many other Bangladeshi fans. I am enjoying the matches thoroughly. Part of the reason is of course our own players doing well. Frankly speaking, if the tournament has any real weakness, it is you.

I was appalled to see the way you treated two Bangladeshi players in the post match awards ceremony on successive days. On Friday, after giving Lendl Simmons an award, you asked him to wait, apparently for collecting his man-of-the-match cheque, when the award actually went to Shakib Al Hasan.

I was ready to accept it as a human error. After all, we all do mistakes. In a normal scenario, we try to correct our mistake/s when the next opportunity presents itself. But after watching you again on Saturday, I am confused if your treatment to Shakib was a deliberate attempt.

When Tamim Iqbal came to collect his man of the match award, you told him, ‘Tamim: I can’t speak your language. What then? English?’ It was unbecoming of a man of your stature who has been involved in commentary for years.

I know many players are not comfortable with English and they prefer their own language on such occasions. There is no harm in it. But as a commentator, before taking the podium you should have known if they are comfortable in English or not. There is no set rule in this regard and it’s all about individual choice.

But it was your duty to do your homework and you get paid for this. Tamim Iqbal is one of the few cricketers in Bangladesh who speaks very good English. He has been playing international cricket for nearly a decade. You, being a commentator, following the Bangladesh team over many matches, should have known this. Or you should not have taken the microphone.

These are players who defied many odds to join the Pakistan Super League and they deserve some respect. If you cannot do this, please leave the commentary box and take up a seat in the gallery. Nobody in Bangladesh will then bother about you.

Regards

Azad Majumder

Sports Editor

Daily New Age

Bangladesh

source: An open letter to Rameez Raja - Cricwizz
No one takes him seriously, he's a poor analyst. Don't take everything to heart, Bangladeshis are so critical on everything. His behavior with our players is pathetic at times, treats them like crap, seriously. He is basically abusing Shoaib Maqsood and Shehzad for under-performing. I would suggesting not generalizing and take his opinion to be our's as it is not. Bangladeshi players are our guest in PSL, any poor behavior is completely intolerable, and if it was hurting; as it seems, we are extremely sorry. Do not take it to heart.
regards
 
. .
I'm almost certain Tamim speak Urdu and speak off camera. Perhaps, Raza was teasing him.

Baat ka batangar banana is favorite hobby among Awami Bengali ( note: they are not Muslim) when it comes to Pakistan or Pakistani. As a matter of fact they hate Islam and Muslim.

However these Haramkoor dalal won't say nothing when Bharti kill our citizen on the boarder, steal our resources and constantly interfere with our internal matter. Our enemy is not bharti rather mujib's remaining cult called la-hasina and Awami badzaat leauge.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom