An Indo-Arab blunder?

[DESERT FIGHTER]

I see 75% Pakistan in west of the Indus river, you mean ancient Balochistan was India and Hind when India/Hind meant land east of the Indus river. Even the Muslim rulers of Hindustan never considered Balochistan as the part of Hindustan while ancient Arabs Sindh as Hind, not Balochistan.

 

[INDIC]

View attachment 38545

Is this some face saving or your elephant foot sized shalwar is on fire.

@INDIC bhaiya is always humiliated by east punjabis even in this forum. Yet he always desperately try to associate himself with Pakistanis

tu wapas ka gaya.

 

[KingMamba]

I see 75% Pakistan in west of the Indus river, you mean ancient Balochistan was India and Hind when India/Hind meant land east of the Indus river. Even the Muslim rulers of Hindustan never considered Balochistan as the part of Hindustan while ancient Arabs Sindh as Hind, not Balochistan.

Another mistake, the Islamic Caliphates differentiated between Sindh and Hind and never saw them as one. This is one example of a map from the time,

.

 

[Kabira]

tu wapas ka gaya.

yaar khab tum logh tora self respect develop karo ghe? Even Indian punjabis beat you guys because of that

 

[INDIC]

Another mistake, the Islamic Caliphates differentiated between Sindh and Hind and never saw them as one. This is one example of a map from the time,

.

You correct about it, as far I know Arabic name is Al-Hind, Hindustan is a Persian name.

 

[Kabira]

You correct about it, as far I know Arabic name is Al-Hind, Hindustan is a Persian name.

Stupid bhaiya he meant Arabs used to say Al-Sindh to Pakistan and Al-Hind for Bharat 13 centuries ago. So even they knew how to differentiate between bhaiyas and Pakistanis.

 

[Foot12]

Another mistake, the Islamic Caliphates differentiated between Sindh and Hind and never saw them as one. This is one example of a map from the time,

.

Thats only because Sindh was under Arab rule while Hind(northern and southern India) was under the rule of the Pratihara
and Rashtrakuta Dynasty at that time but both Sindh and Hind were described as Hindu country by the Arabs.

 

[INDIC]

yaar khab tum logh tora self respect develop karo ghe? Even Indian punjabis beat you guys because of that

Mujhe to tere pe taras aata hai par tune jigra paya hai, wapas zaroor aata hai. ab main tumhari insult nahi karna chahta

 

[Kabira]

Thats only because Sindh was under Arab rule while Hind(northern and southern India) was under the rule of the Pratihara
and Rashtrakuta Dynasty at that time but both Sindh and Hind were described as Hindu country by the Arabs.

All 4 province of of Pakistan were under Arab rule back then. And they differentiated it by calling Bharat as Al-Hind and Pakistan as Al-Sindh.

 

[INDIC]

Stupid bhaiya he meant Arabs used to say Al-Sindh to Pakistan and Al-Hind for Bharat 13 centuries ago. So even they knew how to differentiate between bhaiyas and Pakistanis.

so, Pakistan says Pakistan was Al-Sind, India was Al-Hind but same Pakistanis claim Pakistan was Al-Hind. Tere sarkari taleem ka kuch nahi ho sakta.

 

[KingMamba]

Thats only because Sindh was under Arab rule while Hind(northern and southern India) was under the rule of the Pratihara
and Rashtrakuta Dynasty at that time but both Sindh and Hind were described as Hindu country by the Arabs.

This is wrong they described Sindh as Sindh even before they took the region from Dahir.

 

[Kabira]

Mujhe to tere pe taras aata hai par tune jigra paya hai, wapas zaroor aata hai. ab main tumhari insult nahi karna chahta

Laghta ese hai ke ajj video mein nanga Sadhu tu tha isi tara khate rehna maar punjabis se aur wapis ana na bulna. Besharam ho chuke ho ab, tum ko Indian punjab chale jana chaye dosre bhaiyas ki tara.

Beghairat bhaiyas now are converting to Sikhsm and calling themseves punjabis while speaking bojpuri

 

[KingMamba]

Stupid bhaiya he meant Arabs used to say Al-Sindh to Pakistan and Al-Hind for Bharat 13 centuries ago. So even they knew how to differentiate between bhaiyas and Pakistanis.

Arabs did that because they say it as two different groups of people but the truth is sindhu is the local name for the river whereas Hindu was the name given to the river by the Persians when they translated so it was most likely either ignorance of the history behind the name on the part of the Arabs or they saw it as different nations which makes sense since the Sindhis had their own powerful kingdom.

so, Pakistan says Pakistan was Al-Sind, India was Al-Hind but same Pakistanis claim Pakistan was Al-Hind. Tere sarkari taleem ka kuch nahi ho sakta.

Pakistan was al Sindh but Persians called it Hind and Greeks translated that to Ind. Not until the diadochi period did Ind and Indoi come to denote anything east of Pakistan as Alexander did not know there was anything farther until he had come to the region himself and learned of the rich Kingdoms that laid further east. Before that whatever he knew of the region came from Persian sources who only knew about the border of Darius' empire which included the Indus valley. After that everything East was considered Indoi or India if you want to call it even South East Asia was called East Indies.

 

[INDIC]

Laghta ese hai ke ajj video mein nanga Sadhu tu tha isi tara khate rehna maar punjabis se aur wapis ana na bulna. Besharam ho chuke ho ab, tum ko Indian punjab chale jana chaye dosre bhaiyas ki tara.

Beghairat bhaiyas now are converting to Sikhsm and calling themseves punjabis while speaking bojpuri

Koi na, tere mein insult jhelne ka jigra hai aur koshish mein laga rahta hai, I respect you for that.

 

[American Pakistani]

What a u-turn, you were previously showing interest in ancient Indian books.

huh?

Seems like you are trained for switching your lie mode on too. Can you prove yourself?

Look what East Punjabis did in your West Punjab in 1965.

Look at this one @save_ghenda

@mods I report his off topic post but as a result of no action against him...i was forced to respond in the same manner.