American attack aftermath: Pakistan declares attack a 'plot'

[VCheng]

Mr Cheng, in the spirit of referring to official sources, would you accept China's & Russia's official positions that the NATO's attack was an unacceptable breach of Pakistan's sovereignty?

China and Russia are saying and doing what serves their respective national interest best.

If China is so convinced it was an attack on Pakistan, are they regarding this as an attack on China, as they said they would?

Actions speak louder than words.

 

[karan.1970]

Who said that mortars were used to attack the helis?


.

From the OP

He went into comprehensive detail about the sequence of events known so far, explaining that a check post code-named Volcano first came under attack at around 15 to 30 minutes after midnight. A nearby check post, code-named Boulder, responded with 12.7 mm anti-aircraft weapons and mortars after the Volcano check post came under attack from gunship helicopters.

 

[Raja.Pakistani]

If these soldiers were NATO soldiers, you get detail report within few hours but american double standards

 

[JonAsad]

.. because that is the correctly impartial thing to do at this point in time.

yup i agree- quoting unknown Pakistani officials and comparing them with the official ISPR statement and calling it official backtracking- is the correct and impartial thing to do for you-

 

[53fd]

The FACT remains that everybody blinded by emotionalism and vested patriotism was screaming "bloody murder of sleeping soldiers 2.5 km inside Pakistan" including military officers (?intentionally) leaking information to the press, and that has shown to be WRONG.

Unnamed military officers who were speaking on behalf of no one, on their personal capacity, not representing the official position of PA/ISPR. Please get this through your head. Can you show me where the ISPR claimed the posts were 2.5kms from the border? The Pakistani position in clear, & has been consistent throughout.

 

[mjnaushad]

China and Russia are saying and doing what serves their respective national interest best.

If China is so convinced it was an attack on Pakistan, are they regarding this as an attack on China, as they said they would?

Actions speak louder than words.

And NATO and US will say what servers their national interest....... NOT THE TRUTH....

 

[VCheng]

Unnamed military officers who were speaking on behalf of no one, on their personal capacity, not representing the official position of PA/ISPR. Please get this through your head. Can you show me where the ISPR claimed the posts were 2.5kms from the border? The Pakistani position in clear, & has been consistent throughout.

And what will you do when the issue of "provocation" is settled too?

 

[Tangent]

Although it is a sad incident...with so many loss of life..
But it seems pakistan wants to "Milk" US on the pretext of this incident. More armaments ??
There has been more loss of life by the drone attack...but no uproar.

Looks life the reaction to the incident is being fueled artificially.
pakistan says 'sorry' not enough..but has it ( government or army) has come out of what it wants more to the 'sorry'.

 

[Luftwaffe]

You need time and careful planning ..... Need to see every angle... if you want to twist the facts....

Nobody knows the real details of these attacks, pentagon. Read it? no immediate statements-information from boss in control of the air base. Surely NATO-US must already have seen the on board video records of those gunships, Co/Pilots must have already recorded their version and statements and it take very little time for information to reach pentagon every minute. And then you hear pentagon doesn't know anything!, It does not take a month to investigate.

 

[53fd]

China and Russia are saying and doing what serves their respective national interest best.

If China is so convinced it was an attack on Pakistan, are they regarding this as an attack on China, as they said they would?

Actions speak louder than words.

Similarly, the statements of the NATO/Afghanistan/US are what serves their respective interests as well. Every nation says things out of their geopolitical strategic interests. But what happened that day was a violation of any agreement NATO & Pakistan have had on dealing with terrorists in the region. And this is reflected by the official statements coming out other nations claiming this was an breach of Pakistan's sovereignty, & inexcusable & unacceptable.

 

[JonAsad]

Although it is a sad incident...with so many loss of life..
But it seems pakistan wants to "Milk" US on the pretext of this incident. More armaments ??
There has been more loss of life by the drone attack...but no uproar.

Looks life the reaction to the incident is being fueled artificially.
pakistan says 'sorry' not enough..but has it ( government or army) has come out of what it wants more to the 'sorry'.

The "milking US" terminology i am reading alot in some ratshit forum- do you came from that bharat ratshit forum with their theory?-

 

[53fd]

And what will you do when the issue of "provocation" is settled too?

Where is the 'too' coming from? No 'settling' has taken place in the official ISPR/Pakistani position, it has been consistent throughout.

 

[888jamie888]

Oh Yes we do , We have been dealing with it for past 10 years , we lost more then 35,000 lives due it .
you on the other hand have been living a sweet dream fed to you by CNN,BBC , NYT & other news sources , you have not even 5% idea of what the true ground realities are .

Yep, but if there was a war, I'm sure things would get a lot worse for you rather than me.

 

[VCheng]

Where is the 'too' coming from? No 'settling' has taken place in the official ISPR/Pakistani position, it has been consistent throughout.

Let's wait and see, shall we? 23rd December is not all that far away, is it?

 

[Tangent]

The "milking US" terminology i am reading alot in some ratshit forum- do you came from that bharat ratshit forum with their theory?-

So..U agree that it is the case so...?
What is in the list ?