What's new

American-Arab: Box office hit ‘American Sniper’ sparks anti-Muslim hatred







Americans were illegal invaders of Iraq and did commit countless of crimes. American soldiers fought for nothing. The war was a complete joke and fiasco.

The fallen American soldiers were victims of their governments failed policy. The idea of them fighting for democracy and the well-being of Iraq was unfortunately nothing more than gullible talk. We see the results of that in today's Iraq. A failed country drowning in bloodshed.

I am sorry but I don't see it any other way.

Had Iraq invaded USA some Americans would be resisting the occupation as well and they would be considered as war heroes. In Iraq they are called terrorists. It's the most misused word nowadays.

Juba did not belong to Al-Qaeda either. Most of the resistance in Iraq was done by ordinary locals who had ordinary jobs during the day.
 
Last edited:
.
May I ask, What kind of American are you? Black, White, Latino, Asiatic?

I ask it, because according to it I will respond.


I like to know why you think race has anything to do with anything??
don't tell me you think white people including myself are more privileged than other races, lol

you buying into the zionists propoganda???
 
.
An insult like that coming from a stupid civvie doesn't really have any weight.

Let me see if I understand this. @Alienoz_TR posts this "Admit it, Jews use white boys as their mercenaries, flood Blacks to rape and kill white boys, import Latinos to keep black population in check. Then they add some Asians and Muslims into the flavor. There you have it: Jewish States of America." but you chose to respond to me and call me stupid?? Yeah, I'm sure the nation of Pakistan must be extremely proud of your service as well as your intelligence.
 
.
Well I personally feel that SEAL unit , in general has code of silence , and this man did not respect that .I am sure many SEAL members , would not feel comfortable with his view points expressed in the book

The movies is not about realistic interpretation rather , a Hollywood pop corn version of story which twists and fabricates a story that appeals to masses to serve a general purpose.

Normally member of elite units have code , and a sense of secrecy , they keep the missions knowledge as a safe confidential info.

They movie does not captures the full story

The movie does not discusses , why these units were in Iraq in first place ? Iraq had to WMD nor they had war , it was a 100% peaceful country

The movie DUMBS it down for people age 14-15 , so they would watch the movie , buy Guns and SEAL gear , and sign up to join military , lets face it average Joe can't become a SEAL

This movie is a master piece because it captures war and its effect on soldiers , and is not a pop corn version movie
 
Last edited:
.
Let me see if I understand this. @Alienoz_TR posts this "Admit it, Jews use white boys as their mercenaries, flood Blacks to rape and kill white boys, import Latinos to keep black population in check. Then they add some Asians and Muslims into the flavor. There you have it: Jewish States of America." but you chose to respond to me and call me stupid?? Yeah, I'm sure the nation of Pakistan must be extremely proud of your service as well as your intelligence.

There is no insult. It is the reality.

I like to know why you think race has anything to do with anything??
don't tell me you think white people including myself are more privileged than other races, lol

you buying into the zionists propoganda???

Before worrying about Turkish presence in NATO, you white guys should worry about illegal aliens hunting white women in your area. :)
 
.
There is no insult. It is the reality.



Before worrying about Turkish presence in NATO, you white guys should worry about illegal aliens hunting white women in your area. :)


man if you aren't banned soon....:rofl::rofl::rofl:

i feel discriminated on here. it's hard knock life being a white boy and my beautiful white sisters getting hunted :disagree:

my little sister has a thing for dark meat, but that's her decision. I got a thing for Asian chicks and black girls with a big booty so I can't complain.


:bounce::bounce::bounce::bounce:
 
.
Its a Good movie i watched it yesterday via torrent :-D :-D but killing a child was a awful scene rest it was same like heartlocker

You realize that when these guys are in the war zone, they are doing their job given to them by the Commander In-chief of the US Military (The President of the US). Unfortunately, throughout the history of mankind, war zones don't turn out to be the most humanitarian places to be. The scope of this movie is the Sniper here, outside of it, there is a LOT of life saving and humanitarian work the US military has done and constantly does.

Unfortunately, the movie's scope is limited so it doesn't show that. Remember in Pakistan, the Earthquake, the Avalanches, where the US immediately provided heavy machinery, Chinooks, and redirected a portion of its forces from Afghanistan to Pakistan to help the Pakistani government find people buried in rubble and save lives, provide medical and engineering support, search and rescue ops and all?

Btw, I agree that Clint Eastwood or Bradley C, should make a statement or two outlining the purpose behind the movie and not the meaning people may be extracting from it, towards hating a certain ethnic group.
 
.
You realize that when these guys are in the war zone, they are doing their job given to them by the Commander In-chief of the US Military (The President of the US). Unfortunately, throughout the history of mankind, war zones don't turn out to be the most humanitarian places to be. The scope of this movie is the Sniper here, outside of it, there is a LOT of life saving and humanitarian work the US military has done.

They made it a warzone, it's no excuse to shoot random people which has happened, the rest is a different topic, no one denies US doesn't do good.
 
.
You realize that when these guys are in the war zone, they are doing their job given to them by the Commander In-chief of the US Military (The President of the US). Unfortunately, throughout the history of mankind, war zones don't turn out to be the most humanitarian places to be. The scope of this movie is the Sniper here, outside of it, there is a LOT of life saving and humanitarian work the US military has done.

Unfortunately, the movie's scope is limited so it doesn't show that. Remember in Pakistan, the Earthquake, the Avalanches, where the US immediately provided heavy machinery, Chinooks, and redirected a portion of its forces from Afghanistan to Pakistan to help the Pakistani government find people buried in rubble and save lives, provide medical and engineering support, search and rescue ops and all?

Btw, I agree that Clint Eastwood or Bradley C, should make a statement or two outlining the purpose behind the movie and not the meaning people may be extracting from it towards hating a certain ethnic group.

George Bush and Dick Cheney and whole upper US military cadre would have been tried in front of International Crime Court, In an ideal world, of course. Do not ever try to white-wash the crimes your military committed. Criminal US army personnel went unpunished for the crimes they committed.
 
.
The real , tragedy is all these lives lost , for perhaps no real reason , the man just bragged about his missions , rather then keep it secret , He wanted attention and Hollywood

It would have been nice if the movie covered , why the soldiers were there in first place sicne there was no WMD in iraq and there were no terrorist in iraq mostly the place was destabilized due to invasion

In end he said something nasty to another marine and the other guy shot him in end

The movie does not even mention the Sniper was killed by another marine

What we really come back to ... is all the people who died , what did they died for in end ?

Did Saddam Hussain pose a risk that so many people had to die ?

The Sniper himself was just a pawn a mere unit

The big story is the Sniper was there to just merely follow "ORDERS" which were illegal in nature in first place to destabilize a country that was posing no security threat, so in essence he was the enforcer of the bad judgement , which eventually created a space for groups like ISIS to form in long run


The Sniper had only joined military after his Rodeo career ended with injury and he could no longer participate in Rodeo
, his intentions were always to earn a living as he did not knew any other professional he hated books and schools , stated in his memoirs and books

So here we see the system taking a man , who clearly was not educated to work and puting a gun into his hand and then sending him to a war he does not know what is it for ?

When he comes back his life is all gone , marriage fails. And he is in debt




For mere - orders which proved to be wrong in end​





It would have been nice if the movie showed cut scenes , when Sniper was running around dodging enemies what was congress doing which parties and lunches were those executives were attending , perhaps it was the Tuxedo event in the city

While the sniper was calling home , thinking it was going to be his last night , no cut scenes were shown congressional leaders enjoying a nice football game on TV , unaware of a person called Sniper

I wish they had cut-scenes , split windows one showing sniper going thru his shiat and in other window showing the congress leader enjoying his life , chilling not aware of his bad decision

And what is even more tragic is that his death story will be taken up to lure more "young folks" to path of killing and destruction
 
Last edited:
.
They made it a warzone, it's no excuse to shoot random people which has happened, the rest is a different topic, no one denies US doesn't do good.

Was it heaven on planet under Saddam's rule? Killing his own people, firing chemical gases on political opponents and all? Iraq may not be the best place today or since the US left. But I have 0% doubt about Iraq shinning in the near future. At that time, people will be thankful that we took Saddam out. Otherwise, he would've stayed in power, suppressing everyone's right to grow, then he'd transfer power to one of his sons or family members and Iraq would continue to be a family state without progress.
 
.
They made it a warzone, it's no excuse to shoot random people which has happened.


shoot random people. i don't think you understand the amount of crap they gotta go through before engaging a target. it's quite annoying watching these kill videos on youtube and you're like it's obviously a terrorist shoot shoot, but you gotta get clearance first.


collaterall damage is probably the lowest any war in history.

just look at Syria who knows how many innocents have been killed by those crude dumb weapons.
 
.
Americans were illegal invaders of Iraq and did commit countless of crimes. American soldiers fought for nothing. The war was a complete joke and fiasco.

The fallen American soldiers were victims of their governments failed policy. The idea of them fighting for democracy and the well-being of Iraq was unfortunately nothing more than gullible talk. We see the results of that in today's Iraq. A failed country drowning in bloodshed.

I am sorry but I don't see it any other way.

Had Iraq invaded USA some Americans would be resisting the occupation as well and they would be considered as war heroes. In Iraq they are called terrorists.

We knocked off Saddam in a month. The fact that Iraqis couldn't get together and come to a consensus on what happens next and move on with their lives is not our failing, but rather Iraqis. We can't help it if you have multiple factions that hate each others guts. Our job was to get them out from under the yoke of Saddam's rule. We did that. What happened next and the mess that Iraq has became is not indicative of our actions, but rather an indictment of the way things are in the middle east. We should have been out of there in a couple of years. But a decade later, the Iraqis are still fighting amongst each other.
 
.
shoot random people. i don't think you understand the amount of crap they gotta go through before engaging a target. it's quite annoying watching these kill videos on youtube and you're like it's obviously a terrorist shoot shoot, but you gotta get clearance first.

I'm responding to his comment, the excuse of it being a warzone and the pressure on the guys and all is no excuse to make mistakes.
 
.
We knocked off Saddam in a month. The fact that Iraqis couldn't get together and come to a consensus on what happens next and move on with their lives is not our failing, but rather Iraqis. We can't help it if you have multiple factions that hate each others guts. Our job was to get them out from under the yoke of Saddam's rule. We did that. What happened next and the mess that Iraq has became is not indicative of our actions, but rather an indictment of the way things are in the middle east. We should have been out of there in a couple of years. But a decade later, the Iraqis are still fighting amongst each other.

No, Saddam threatened petro-dollar system. He wanted to switch to euro.

Your guys were not there for the sake of Iraqi people. Your guys did not hesitate using Depleted uranium rounds in and around the cities. On What morality ground Americans can talk about it?
 
.

Latest posts

Back
Top Bottom