foxbat
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Jan 31, 2010
- Messages
- 4,093
- Reaction score
- -7
- Country
- Location
and what thing did you built for SU-30 MKI?
Every thing including the engine
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
and what thing did you built for SU-30 MKI?
Every thing including the engine
How the hell can i find links to something bogus? You're the one who is claiming some thing, NOW PROVE IT!!!
Built in India unlike JF-17 that is imported from china and painted in pakistan.
Every thing including the engine
and what thing did you built for SU-30 MKI?
^ Okay tell us what thing India built that contributed in the development of of S-30 Jaguars and many Mig-21?
Why is the thread so silent after the pics of MKI? I guess the same will be achieved by MMRCA in Ambala..
Your response does not answer the one you are replying too. It is utterly irrelevant if the Thunder has flown so many hours- does this improve the production rate or the Paksitani content on board it? As this is what gesslar was saying. You've just tried to derail the thread. Don't let your inferiority complex ruin another good thread mate.
Is it really ? ... I know the Indians workship the MKI and declare it God's gift to aviation but that doesn't make any difference to the rest of us ...
Oh we have all the high morals here.....you characters can't digest the fact that JF-17 which started life much later than you LCA is actually flying combat missions where as you don't even have the confidence to fly your pride and joy even on republic day fly past. !!!
Anyways nothing more expected from fan boys.
BTW, here is Serial Production-20 just off Kamra assembly line......continue with your cheap banter and wishful thinking.
Yes , engine imported from US , radar from Israel and half of equipment sourced from random foreign contractors and yet you cant get it operational after 3 decades and counting and claim it as Indian ... Way to go , kid ... JFT is assembled in Pakistan , efforts are underway to manufacture the equipment in our country ... Nobody claimed otherwise ...
Oh we have all the high morals here.....you characters can't digest the fact that JF-17 which started life much later than you LCA is actually flying combat missions where as you don't even have the confidence to fly your pride and joy even on republic day fly past. !!!
Anyways nothing more expected from fan boys.
BTW, here is Serial Production-20 just off Kamra production line......continue with your cheap banter and wishful thinking.
Rather make it assembled from knockout kits ...
Your comments make me laugh
What Gripen has US engine and Italian radar so its not Swedish? J-10 has Russian
engine so its not Chinese? Grow up kid. Building a plane does not mean just making the
engine and plane it means a lot more. Tell PAC to try to design and build a plane all
by themselves and then we'll see where you'll get. India has also built HAL Dhruv helicopter
and LCH attack helo, why hasn't Pak built such things then??
getting everything done by china for you and then claiming and thinking, just thinking
not reasoning that JF-17 is indigenous grace of allah. Grow up kid.
LCA is atleast 65-70% Indian tech and 100% Indian funding.
JF-17 is 5% pakistani tech and 50% Pakistani funding.
This looks exactly like the plane delivered by China in the IL-78. Good repainting job.
Wake me up when pak designs its own fighter.
That's because Mr.Einstein, BVR capability is not born out of thin air, nor is it a God given gift to JFT. You have to add it manually. You are talking as if BVR capability is normal thing which grows on trees and I'm the one who is questioning this abnormality. If you say it is BVR capable, it means, it is a very sophisticated capability which has been recently added on the existing fighter which during its development stages was not BVR capable, meaning YOU HAVE TO PROVE THAT EXISTS! The onus is on you because you are the one who is giving a statement that "JFT is BVR capable NOW". I'm merely questioning that statement and asking proof for that.You were the one who claimed that JFT isn't BVR capable in the first place so whom needs to prove what , genius ? ...
Provided by? or you started from scratch and build and designed everything yourself?
YOU HAVE TO PROVE THAT EXISTS! The onus is on you because you are the one who is giving a statement that "JFT is BVR capable NOW". I'm merely questioning that statement and asking proof for that.