What's new

Al-Khalid & Type 99 Comparison

master_fx

FULL MEMBER
Joined
Mar 14, 2006
Messages
473
Reaction score
0
i am just wondering what kind of tank would you like to have when you left with 2 choices:
1. type 99
2. Al-Khalid


SPECIFICATIONS
Crew: 3
Weight: 54t
Engine: 1,500hp liquid cooled diesel
Transmission: Mechanical, planetary
Track: Metallic with RMSh, with rubber-tyred road wheels
Suspension: Torsion bar
Radio: Receive/transmit, telephone, laser communications
Dimension: Length: 11.00m; Height: 2.20m; Width: 3.40m
Ground pressure: N/A
Cruising range: 450km, or 600km with external tanks
Speed: Max road 80km/h; max off-road 60km/h; average cross-country 35~40km/h; max swim N/A
Fording depths: 5m with snorkel
Main gun: 125mm smoothbore
Rate of fire: 8 rounds/min (autoloader), 1~2 r/min (manual load)
Elevation/Depression: N/A
Auxiliary weapon: One coaxial 7.62mm machine gun; one 12.7mm air-defence machine gun
Fire control: Laser rangefinder input, onboard computer, wind sensor, and control panel




SPECIFICATIONS
Crew: 3
Weight: 48t
Engine: Ukraine built 6TD 1,200hp liquid cooled diesel
Transmission: Mechanical, planetary
Track: Metallic with RMSh, with rubber-tyred road wheels
Suspension: Torsion bar
Radio: Receive/transmit, telephone
Dimension: Length: 10.07m; Height: 2.40m; Width: 3.50m
Ground Pressure: 26hp/t
Cruising Range: 450km
Speed: Max road 65km/h; max off-road 45km/h
Fording Depths: 5m with snorkel
Main Gun: Indigenous 125mm smoothbore, 39 rounds
Rate of Fire: 8 rounds/min (autoloader), 1~2 r/min (manual load)
Elevation/Depression: N/A
Auxiliary Weapon: One coaxial 7.62mm machine gun; one 12.7mm air-defence machine gun
Fire Control: Laser rangefinder input, onboard computer, wind sensor, and control panel

 
. .
Well, they both are for their own terrains and standards. Al-Khalid has the Ukraine engine, which is much cooler, and sustainable to heat.

T-99 has much more power in the engine but it gets equal when comparing to its weight.
 
.
I think it'll be hard to compare these two tanks together when both of these MBTs are quite similar and were developed by the same people. AL Khalid had great influence from the Chinese MBT-2000 which evidently further developed and improved into T-98. And the T99 is no more than a T98 but with add-on armor, improved engine and some kinda high tech laser beam cannon onboard or something eh hehe.

I'll take a T99 over the AK, only because its similar to the AK, but improved substantially to a greater amount.:bat:
 
.
master_fx said:
Ground Pressure: 26hp/t

This is wierdest figure ever seen, ground pressure has to be measured in kg/m sq and not in terms of Hp/ton.:crazy2:
 
.
MOO said:
I think it'll be hard to compare these two tanks together when both of these MBTs are quite similar and were developed by the same people. AL Khalid had great influence from the Chinese MBT-2000 which evidently further developed and improved into T-98. And the T99 is no more than a T98 but with add-on armor, improved engine and some kinda high tech laser beam cannon onboard or something eh hehe.

I'll take a T99 over the AK, only because its similar to the AK, but improved substantially to a greater amount.:bat:

Yes, they are developed by the same people, but the Type 99 is an entire generation ahead of the Al-khalid. Al-khalid is MBT-2000, it is just the pakistani name. Type 99 is very different from the Type 98. Al-khalid is comparable to Type 96 mod, since they are in the same generation and almost developed at the same time...
 
.
AK will be a winner for pakistan.

Admin: Avoid oneliners and semi-onliners. Its against our rules.

Thanks.
 
.
actually mbt2000, type 90II or AK watever u call it has better armour and electronic equipments than type 96..... however when compare to type 99.... it would be like tiger(type 99) and pather(AK) durin ww2
 
.
master_fx said:
actually mbt2000, type 90II or AK watever u call it has better armour and electronic equipments than type 96..... however when compare to type 99.... it would be like tiger(type 99) and pather(AK) durin ww2

You mean panzer

The ak is more versatile and manueverable it might also have some better electronics than the Type 99 but then again the Type 99 have better ecm, more speed and much better armor (armor is 1200mm compared to m1a2 800mm and al-khalid 800mm)
 
.
. .
The AL Khalid MBT is operating Chinese FCS. What's wrong with admitting we used their equipment? The Chinese are top notch in R&D and has been building tanks for yrs.

2ca81836edb58e80d5605e4761ea36ff.jpg
 
.
MOO said:
The AL Khalid MBT is operating Chinese FCS. What's wrong with admitting we used their equipment? The Chinese are top notch in R&D and has been building tanks for yrs.

2ca81836edb58e80d5605e4761ea36ff.jpg

true..... it would be like taking a screw from your car trying to fit it onto your computer..... (western electronic suite may not be compatable with AK (shapes, sizes)
best to just go for the original electronic suite or let china upgrade them....:cool:
 
.
This is a good video here guys, its appears to be the T98 or T99 and it survive a full impact from an Anti-tank weapon during trials.

:smile:
)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
.
master_fx said:
true..... it would be like taking a screw from your car trying to fit it onto your computer..... (western electronic suite may not be compatable with AK (shapes, sizes)
best to just go for the original electronic suite or let china upgrade them....:cool:

Dude what are you talking about?
The AK was only based off the chinese T-90 tank not copied. And the AK doesnt use any chinese avionics, its loading is the same on the french leclerc, its avionics are western and made in pakistan

The AK's management system is amongst the most advanced in the world and is made in pakistan by HIT, its guns are made in pakistan under liscense production from germany

Enough BS about AK using chinese weapons and electronics
 
.

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom