Dazzler
PDF THINK TANK: CONSULTANT
![](/styles/default/xenforo/ranks/General.jpg)
- Joined
- Oct 19, 2008
- Messages
- 9,163
- Reaction score
- 31
- Country
- Location
Fail to understand what has this got to do with the fact that your previous claim about Chinese AFSPS achieving upto 800mm and 960mm RHA penetration at 2000m.... you give me the link from another forum where the senior armor guys have been saying the same as BS... even the Chinese members supporting them.
I know about the 140mm Chinese gun, 120mm Chinese gun, 125mm Chinese gun aswell as 155mm Chinese gun.. what are you trying to show me here ?
ever since I have come to this thread you've been running around circles.
1st with Nozh ERA and then with Al Khalid armor level and then with Kombat CLATGM and now with Chinese AFSPDS...
Take your time reading the comments by the members on the thread you gave as source... I am surprised as you advocate others to read and don't read yourself... Damian90 is a good member at tanknet and ***.
Chinese Military Photos(new thread) - Page 52
I cannot be right everywhere but here you are wrong... like you were with Nozh ERA on Al Khalid/T-80UD, 750mm Armor on Al Khalid, auto-loader not being able to load Kombat CLATGM.
Plus the new NATO gun is the L55 which is 55 cal. length and not 52... besides NATO 105mm aswell as 120mm does fire LAHAT CLATGM and the your whole quoted part talks about superiority of NATO guns and their single piece ammo... and how ZTZ-98 is inferior to them.... which somehow in some blizzard circumstances are able to perform better than those NATO gun... according to you.![]()
You seem to be one of a kind simply because you argue on every piece of information provided in a thread which has a name, "information pool". This information is not made up by me or anyone.
Sigh!!