Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Lol.. Clearly this Indian knows nothing about carrier ops. tractor is never suitable for carrier ops. Using tractor on carrier deck is clearly a joke and demonstrated the ignorance of the top level of IN. China maybe late but I bet its has more knowledge on operating a carrier than India. At least , china did not use farm land equipment for it carrier. Those tractor are big and tall, occupy precious carrier deck. Due to the tall height of the tractor, longer tow is needed. Therefore even complicating the whole carrier ops procedure and create potential hazard and danger on deck.
Indian are master? Master in farming on carrier deck?
哈哈哈 典型的印度人。
记住 牛是神圣的 ^_^
哈哈哈 典型的印度人。
记住 牛是神圣的 ^_^
വെച്ചിട്ട് പോടാ ചൈനീസ് തല്ലുകൊള്ളി
moron doesnt know we can retaliate in 50 languages
വെച്ചിട്ട് പോടാ ചൈനീസ് തല്ലുകൊള്ളി
Delusion is with you. Type1130 is not even copy of goalkeeper. It's performance has even surpassed it. 11000rounds per minute. From chief designer that admit, it has tested against Mach 4 drone. You Indian properly can't accept Chinese advancement due to your impotent.
Then may I know what Indian CWIS can made besides using money to buy? None.
Since like you have not much knowledge on Chinese CWIS. Type1130 are complex with huge system underneath the deck that only the new huge hull of Type055 and CV is able to mount it. For your info, even the new Type052D destroyer despite being new still stuck with the old Type730 CWIS due to its limited hull size. Can corvetter and fast attack craft mount it? Of cos, no.
Type 1130 are latest Chinese state of art CWIS using powerful sensor and armed with 11 rotating barrels, consuming 11,000 rounds per minute. You can imagine the need to house a massive ammunition drum below deck in order to feed the high consuming rate of fire to create an impenetrable wall against supersonic missile.
Of cos, its a last ditch effort to block attacking missile. But a highly effective one too,during the trial test. It has a intercepting rate of 98% against Mach 4 incoming missile.
Do you have link for your tall claims And moreover what drone PLA/N/AF has which can fly at Mach 4.
CM-400AKG
What does it mean ?
First, CM-400AKG is an anti-ship missile, not a drone.
Second, unlike Brahmos, CM-400AKG is not a sea-skimming anti-ship missile. It does a high-altitude climb after launch with a high-speed dive onto the target.
Though China have C-802A and CM-802AKG sea-skimming anti-ship missiles, but these are subsonic.
So, is your CIWS system capable of neutralizing supersonic/hypersonic sea-skimming anti-ship missiles?
And how would you test that?
Actually, BrahMos can NOT fly at 2.8 mach at low altitudes -- 2.8 mach is the max speed attained at higher altitudes -- what would it be at sea level? well,near mach 2
BrahMos is the fastest cruise missile, and a 2nd version is coming with hypersonic speed. However, my question was about the capabilities of the Chinese CIWS systems. Intercepting a BM and a cruise missile are two different ball games. So, probable success against a ballistic type supersonic anti-ship missile doesn't automatically translate into success against a supersonic sea-skimming one.
New Recruit
BrahMos is the fastest cruise missile, and a 2nd version is coming with hypersonic speed. However, my question was about the capabilities of the Chinese CIWS systems. Intercepting a BM and a cruise missile are two different ball games. So, probable success against a ballistic type supersonic anti-ship missile doesn't automatically translate into success against a supersonic sea-skimming one.
New Recruit
yeah i know brahMos seems to have an edge over sub-sonic ones i was just stating the fact that brahMos's speed comes down to mach 2 when flying at low altitudes --