What's new

Aid to India will be stopped, pledges minister

.
Pakistans claim of the koh i noor is quite strong.

Maharajah Ranjit Singh of Gujranwala (Pakistan) handed over the diamond during the Treaty of Lahore.

Tha Koh i Noor is in British possession for more than 100 years now, does that mean that it belong to them? Same is for Maharaja, He's one of the people who possessed it. Country of origin is India. To be specific its from Andhra Pradesh.

But trust me, they'll not give it to anyone, if they do then every British museum will be empty as every country will start asking their stuff!
 
.
Pakistans claim of the koh i noor is quite strong.

Maharajah Ranjit Singh of Gujranwala (Pakistan) handed over the diamond during the Treaty of Lahore.

That's a stupid reasoning, isn't it? The diamond also belonged to Babur and Humayun, so should Persians also lay claim over it?

The diamond belonged to these rulers because they ruled the Delhi Sultanate and subsequent dynesties. The diamond was mined in modern day Andhra Pradesh, so India has the best claim over it (after the british of course, who looted it ;) )
 
. .
Britain is to stop giving aid money to India, Andrew Mitchell, the International Development secretary has said.

The Government has come under pressure to explain why British taxpayers are giving millions to countries like India at a time of public sector cuts.

Mr Mitchell’s international aid budget is one of only two, alongside health, which has been ring fenced and so is protected from the austerity drive.

India has been singled out because of increasing prosperity and the fact that it has a nuclear programme.

Mr Mitchell said it was not only “morally right” but in the UK's national interests to continue to fund development projects around the world.
He said that he wanted the UK to become a “development superpower”, adding: “Britain is doing brilliant things around the world…

“Just as America is a military superpower so because of the brilliant things that Britain is doing in the poorest places in the world, saving lives.”

A report from MPs on the Commons international development committee published on Tuesday is expected to be critical of Britain for giving money to India.

In a television interview, Mr Mitchell said that the Indian programme had been frozen “so for the first time this year since the war it is not Britain’s largest development programme”.

Mr Mitchell told BBC1’s Andrew Marr Show that he did not think that the UK would continue to fund programmes in India “for very much longer”.

He said: “India is a place where there are more poor people than the whole of sub-Saharan Africa, Britain’s programme is demonstrative it shows how we can get more people into school, and women particularly.

“These programmes are massively scaled up by the Indian taxpayer.British know how is making a huge contribution – now is not the time to stop the programme in India but I don’t think we will be there for very much longer.”

The Government has been under fire for continuing to give 0.7 per cent of gross domestic product to the developing world, despite the domestic cuts programme.

Mr Mitchell said: “I think it was absolutely right of the Coalition to say in the early days that we would not balance the books on the poorest people in Britain or on the planet.

“We don't protect our security only by tanks and guns but also by training the police in Afghanistan, getting girls into school in the Horn of Africa and building up government structures in the Middle East.”

Mr Mitchell was speaking ahead of the Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunisation (Gavi) conference in London on Monday.

The lives of more than four million children can be saved by a set of vaccines which cost the same as a cup of coffee, he said.

He said: “We had a look when we came into Government at all the different ways that Britain does development with British taxpayer funds and one of the very best was the Global Alliance of Vaccines and Immunisation, where effectively you can vaccinate a kid in the poor world for the price of a cup of coffee against all five of the killer diseases which mean so many of these children die before the age of five.”

Mr Mitchell said the Government would also match philanthropic donations by private individuals and companies.

He said that by Monday lunchtime he hoped to have “sufficient funding over the next four years to vaccinate 250,000 children in the poor world and save millions of lives”.

He added: “It’s really important. It’s Britain's big ask for development this year. We want to support it very strongly. We have a leadership role in all of this.”

Gavi is facing a shortfall of £2.3 billion for its work over the next five years, charities have warned. The conference is being chaired by David Cameron, the Prime Minister, and Microsoft founder and philanthropist Bill Gates.

Writing in The Observer newspaper, Mr Cameron said he was “convinced” it was right to protect the country’s aid budget.

He said: “I don't think it would be right to ignore the difference we can make, turn inwards solely to our own problems and effectively balance the books while breaking our promises to the world’s poorest.

“Instead, we should step up, deliver on our promises to the world's poorest and help save millions of lives.”

He added: “The British people are not prone to self-aggrandising. But I think there are times when we should acknowledge the good that we do.”

Mr Gates said Monday’s meeting would “very, very positive”, adding: “This is my life's work, and days like tomorrow energise us to do even better.”

Aid to India will be stopped, pledges minister - Telegraph


I thought we are the only nation who beg others for running the country. :coffee:

Please find that we(Indian taxpayers - People of India) are filling in our shoes when it comes to aiding the poor in our country, that is what the british is feeling about India, They have come to a point that we have become a mature nation in handling our own problems of poverty. The British will continue to fund in areas of infrastructure and technology development in India where they can use the Indian Market for profit. No government does aid for free, they have a secret agenda of investing in the countries growth to reap a percentage of the profit. This is like share trading.

and if any of the Pakistanis still fell that the British is dumping India, i say you do not posses the clarity the Britons have.
 
.
And the history is, there was no Pakistan in this world before 1947!

history repeat's itself, seeing the current senario, if thing's continue the same way as it is going on, there will be no pakistan after 2-3 decade's
 
.
Guys most of you are going off the topic, please post some thing that is relavent to the topic.
 
.
India receives about $2bn of aid per year from some donors::

Institute of Development Studies - UK should maintain aid to India, parliamentary inquiry is told

World Bank aid to India to touch $9.3 billion:

The Hindu : Business / Economy : World Bank aid to India to touch $9.3 billion

$9.3billion World Bank Aid to India | Stock Watch

India gets $5 billion economic aid every year:

Each year India accepts about $5 billion in economic aid, mostly from 6 major bilateral donors, as well as the World Bank, IMF and other multilateral donors. In 2000 India was a net recipient of WFP money.

India – Aid Recipient or Donor? | The Discomfort Zone

Talking about loans:

India, largest recipient of World Bank loans:

India, largest recipient of World Bank loans - Rediff.com Business
 
.

What is the point of posting this many links, yes we have taken aids from developed donars, we have a billion people to feed and we have a lot to develop the domestic infrastructure to self sustainable condition were our countries way of life for every one is confortable.
 
.


Even China is also getting Aid like India, that AID is for public development purpose. That's not a military AID like our neighbors getting.
China's billion-dollar aid appetite - World news - Asia-Pacific - China - msnbc.com


India is not getting these loans for free, we will pay back the money we got and we are paying the Tax for the money.
 
.
Tha Koh i Noor is in British possession for more than 100 years now, does that mean that it belong to them? Same is for Maharaja, He's one of the people who possessed it. Country of origin is India. To be specific its from Andhra Pradesh.

But trust me, they'll not give it to anyone, if they do then every British museum will be empty as every country will start asking their stuff!

Who says it's andra Pradesh? Noone knows. Some say it was possessed by some ancient dynasties in Pakistan

It might be 5,000 years old. Indians claim it was from andra pradesh.

The fact for sure is it was handed over in Lahore.
 
.
Who says it's andra Pradesh? Noone knows. Some say it was possessed by some ancient dynasties in Pakistan

It might be 5,000 years old. Indians claim it was from andra pradesh.

The fact for sure is it was handed over in Lahore.

Prove it it's not India's or be slow runner :blah:
 
.
India gives: It’s a donor today
By Shashi Tharoor
NEW DELHI - The recent India-Africa
summit in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, at
which India's government pledged $5
billion in aid to African countries, drew
attention to a largely overlooked
phenomenon - India's emergence as a
source, rather than a recipient, of
foreign aid.
For decades after independence --
when Britain left the subcontinent one
of the poorest and most ravaged
regions on earth, with an effective
growth rate of 0% over the preceding
two centuries -- India was seen as an
impoverished land of destitute people,
desperately in need of international
handouts. Many developed countries
showcased their aid to India; Norway,
for example, established in 1959 its
first-ever aid programme there.
But, with the liberalization of the
Indian economy in 1991, the country
embarked upon a period of dizzying
growth, averaging nearly 8% a year
since then. During this time, India
weaned itself from dependence on aid,
preferring to borrow from multilateral
lenders and, increasingly, from
commercial banks. Most foreign-aid
programmes -- with the sole exception
of Britain's -- have dwindled or been
eliminated altogether.
Today, the proverbial shoe is on the
other foot. Long known for its
rhetorical faith in South-South
cooperation, India has begun putting
its money where its mouth used to be.
It has now emerged as a significant
donor to developing countries in Africa
and Asia, second only to China in the
range and quantity of development
assistance given by countries of the
global South.
India gives: It’s a donor today
 
.
Who says it's andra Pradesh? Noone knows. Some say it was possessed by some ancient dynasties in Pakistan

It might be 5,000 years old. Indians claim it was from andra pradesh.

The fact for sure is it was handed over in Lahore.

Stupid trolling roadrunner, have you ever contributed to the topic of the thread in any of the post. I see that in most of your post you have always barked from your point of view and had never known the meaning of empathy(putting yourself in someones shoes)
 
.
Who says it's andra Pradesh? Noone knows. Some say it was possessed by some ancient dynasties in Pakistan

It might be 5,000 years old. Indians claim it was from andra pradesh.

What have you been smoking my friend?
:rofl:
Don't worry, everything will be fine in your life!
 
.

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom