Sarcasm is not a personal attack. A personal attack would be calling someone a fool, as you did in your post 300. You really are particularly intelligent, i see.
please raise points to my posts........... I have explained why Ahmadis leaders should be dealt with as the way of Rasoolallah did with the al-Kazzabs and their followers........... however from your comments you clearly want a secular State and as such, my post clearly answers you question about the invasion...............NOW PLEASE LET ME GET BACK TO HIGHLIGHTING TO OTHER MUSLIMS THE QUOTATIONS OF AHMADIYYA
---------- Post added at 01:26 AM ---------- Previous post was at 01:25 AM ----------
Sarcasm is not a personal attack. A personal attack would be calling someone a fool, as you did in your post 300. You really are particularly intelligent, i see.
---------- Post added at 09:24 PM ---------- Previous post was at 09:22 PM ----------
It wouldn't matter if thousands of people died of course? You'd jump at the chance to invade Pakistan and replace it with your type of government. Citizen deaths are just collateral, I assume?
Now you cry about citizens death when the deaths of children and women in the tribal areas meant nothing........what right do you people now have to claim that...............
And as before, if the current set up is your way of Pakistan, then to hell with that.........