What's new

Agartala Conspiracy confession, what does it mean for our history

Cross posted from another thread:
http://www.defence.pk/forums/bangla...jib-did-not-want-independence-bangladesh.html

Article

Sheikh Mujib: Pakistan and Bangladesh

School reading materials, history books and documents are being revised and rewritten with full governmental energy and huge money from the public exchequer sponsored with renewed vigor by the all powerful Bangladesh P.M. Sheikh Hasina everything for eulogizing her late father Mujib’s credentials. In attaining the goal old materials, books, documents are being destroyed wherever they are in stock or in circulation in whatever form in Bangladesh that in her view might harm her father’s stature. The goal is very lofty in the sense that none of the present or future progeny must come across anything, any bit of information that might hurt the godly image of Hasina’s father. I am not sure if she is up to destroying all other materials that lie outside Bangladesh in documentation centers and libraries, say, in London, Washington etc. The specific aim of the project as it appeared to me is that there is none in history, much less Major Zia, anybody worth in the history of founding of BANGLADESH in 1971.

I intend to limit the item in relevant facts in the 1971 episode not beyond for in the year Bangladesh had come into being as an independent country that I had the opportunity to get a lot of experience through to the whole period staying in Dhaka and in a job teaching in a government college as a mature class one post holder.

On the 7th March 1971 Ramna Race Course mammoth meeting of the great Sheikh Mujib, I was an attendant from rather close to the rostrum the leader spoke for about 15 minutes or so. Before I went to the meeting to listen to the leader’s critical discourse, I had occasion to talk to a friend of mine, an Engineer and Contractor moneyed man by profession, financier of the Awami League and a neighbor of the leader and M.P. from Narayanganj. We made a bet. Mujib must declare independence (UDI) on the day in the meeting. I was for yes, he no. I lost the bet, he won. The leader beyond expectation of many did not make the Unilateral Declaration of Independence (UDI). He ended his speech abruptly and left the meeting right then. Many and I were at a loss what the people do next.

From the 7th evening to the 15th people passed days in suspense and rumors. On the 15th people started to see some light of hope when the Army President Yahya had arrived Dhaka from Islamabad for talks with the leader of East Pakistan. As the media reports went on day in and day out people were given understanding that ‘progress’ made in talks in groups and also in one to one dialogue. But actual happenings and developments all were kept hidden from people’s knowledge. People lived in rumors. On the 23 March, Pakistan’s official Republic Day, Mujib went to meet the President in the Mintu Road Gonobhaban in his car flying proposed flag of Bangladesh. We knew afterwards that certain students’ group overenthusiastic about independence had posted the flag in his car. That was significant on two accounts. That was the day when any leader of the united country should have flown the Pakistan flag, and so flying the proposed Bangladesh flag instead went for meeting with Pakistan President was insult to both Pakistan and the President of Pakistan. Even so, as the students had forcibly posted the flag, Mujib‘s lapse could have been overlooked.

Next two days, people were in complete dark on the 24th and 25th in all wild rumors when at mid night the people of Dhaka were taken by surprise in mortar and gun fires. I returned from the Farm Gate area Tejgaon in myself driven new Fiat car at about 11 on the 25th night, had my late meal and went to bed in some agony. Soon I wake up in midst of unusual sounds and found through my 3rd floor flat window in the Industrial area of fire of shells over flying my government residential building. Right then I got all of my five young children down to the floor lying. No shell hit my building and none near about I could see in lights of fires of the shells. But the rest of the night we heard sounds of gun fires and blaze in some locations. We heard announcement of curfew in the Dhaka city as well. On the 26th it was curfew all day. On the 27th curfew was relaxed for three hours; I had to take in my car one Hindu colleague on his request to the Kawran Bazar grocery market who alone of his own was afraid to go for shopping being a Hindu.

In about a week, in midst of rumors though, I found many thing normal. We started to attend offices but not classes. The other happenings are well recorded and known by this time that I must not dwell at here.

We knew about Mujib’s arrest and Major Zia’s name as he declared independence of Bangladesh at Kalurghat Radio substation in Chittagong nearly 200 miles away from Dhaka. Later on we knew about formal declaration of independence of Bangladesh by some elected MNAs and M.P.s of East Pakistan/Bangladesh of Awami League in the 1970 general election based on the LFO (Legal Framework Order) promulgated by the Army President of Pakistan in mid 1970. They formed a government in exile in Calcutta, the cabinet headed by Mujib as the President of the Peoples Republic of Bangladesh. The conspicuous lapse was that those who made Mujib the President had no consent of the person, much less any written direction of Mujib. On the contrary, he had the only direction left to Secretary Tajuddin before his arrest on the midnight of 25-26th March that they must enforce the 27th March Hartal or shut down action program. Further that Zia’s declaration of independence on the 26/27 March and repeated in the name of Mujib having had no nod whatsoever of Mujib for that was Zia’s broadness, on the one hand, and no scope of any communication with the then unknown Major far away, on the other.

One may recall from available documentary evidence that soon after the Exile Government formed and sought blessings from the Indian P.M. Indira, she blasted the delegation of Tajuddin, Moustaque, Nazrul etc by posing the question on the where about the leader. She further commented, ‘How can I believe the leader/ General who after declaring war surrendered to the enemy?’ Even so, Delhi did everything possible to keep alive the Government in Exile, trained the Guerilla, armed them with weapons and ammunitions to attack installations etc in East Pakistan and ultimately made armed aggression on the 3rd December 1971. Indira, however, had her suspicion and reservations about Mujib if he was in full agreement with the Government in Exile, war and all that followed. The first test of bitterness she had with Mujib when he refused to take for his journey from London to Dhaka on board an Indian Air plane that Indira had offered and Mujib declined to accept. Instead he took a British Air Force plane to fly from London to Dhaka on the 10th January 1972. But on way to Dhaka, he made a stopover in Delhi for huge felicitation he was offered by the Delhi bosses. Al these are more or less known facts of history.

Now I would mention here some crucial facts that though got in record outside Bangladesh in London, in particular, but almost unknown and unrecorded here in any Bangladesh documents.
During his detention in West Pakistan in 1971 he was tried for treason against the State of Pakistan. His main lawyer was A K Brohi, the world renowned professional and man of highest integrity. He left some facts before his death, particularly to an Editor of a fortnightly, Impact International. During my stay in London for about eight years I got to know the editor Mr Faruqi. Brohi kept on record with him two facts. One, Mujib did believe in one and united Pakistan and was not at all for independent Bangladesh, and two, during the 1971 war Mujib offered to the President Yahya to permit him to use the Pakistan media to condemn Indian aggression on East Pakistan and to appeal to all East Pakistani to defend East Pakistan against Indian aggression (See Impact International, 25th September, 1987, .p.19). Before publishing the news as it was on request from Mr Brohi then on his last fatal medical treatment in London Mr Faruqi consulted me if he should have at all published the news as that was. On my clear nod he did.


On arriving Dhaka Tejgaon Airport on the 10th January 1972 in midst of immense pleasure of heroic welcome, while he was coming out from the Tarmac leaning on shoulders of Tajuddin and Moustaque as the then student leader Aftab Ahmad (innovator of the Joy Bangla slogan) later on Professor in DU, as he wrote in an article I came across that the leader at the Tarmac rebuked Tajuddin by name, “TAJUDDIN SHESH PARJANTYA TOMRA PAKISTAN BHENGE DILE” You, Tajuddin, at last have broken Pakistan into pieces! Aftab did not miss the rebuke though that was in low voice as he was very close to them walking down out of the Tarmac. That comment or rebuke was not palatable to young Aftab for being an active freedom fighter of 1971 war.

Later on in mid 1972 Aftab went away forming along with other dissenting lots the JSD and continued editing the daily GONOKONTHO. I came to know him not until in London doing Ph.D. in early 1980s. We had some close relation again beginning in Dhaka in 1990s that we maintained until his tragic assassination not yet probed worth of anything in his DU residence a few years ago.

Mujib’s distancing from Tajuddin within a short time was clear to all. He was not only removed from the Ministry but also ended up in prison. Mujib never in three and a half years in office cared to visit Tajuddin’s Exile Government capital Mujibnagar in Kustia. That Mujib and then Hasina as well not only dishonored Tajuddin but his younger brother Afsar Uddin in her first term (1996-2001) removing him from the Ministry unceremoniously and now Tajuddin’s son Sohel, M. P. recently blasted clearly on his leaving Bangladesh latest a few days ago. Such dishonoring the brilliant freedom fighter and pioneer of the independent Bangladesh movement in 1971 had two main reasons. Tajuddin was committed to socialist Bangladesh that Mujib distasted. The other and possibly more important issue was that the dynastic aim Mujib had and pursued determinedly now by Hasina has had no place for any contender in person, much less any other family.

Bangladesh freedom struggle and so also the Pakistan movement both had the main goals for peoples’ liberation, democratic governance, equity and social justice in sovereign identity and entity. Mujib was involved in both movements of the Bengal people, for Bangladesh as the main leader and for Pakistan as a young student worker in Calcutta. Unfortunately, despite peoples love for him and enormous sacrifices made, Mujib betrayed both, possibly, Bangladesh much more through his opportunism, recklessness of not making UDI in due time, leaving people in utter confusion of the unprepared war giving India to take full advantage of, corruption ridden administration, extra judicial killings of thousands by the unconstitutional Rakhsmi Bahini in reality controlled by the Indian R&AW, his own party men made famine deaths of thousands, if not lakhs, destroying democracy and imposition of one party rule having no mandate of the people, etc. etc. Not for all his sins but for some in total betrayal of the people, he was duly paid in his coins on the 15th August 1975. Thus he confirmed his place in historical records as the Bengal’s second Mir Zafar of the twentieth century, the first one went ahead of him nearly two hundred years ago in 1757 A.D. No amount of massive propaganda by his daughter Hasina wasting huge money from the public exchequer is going to let Muijib have a permanent bright image than that of Mir Zafar or historic national betrayer. In history, Hasina has to remain answerable for the wastage of huge public money she has been recklessly misappropriating for refurbishing the otherwise image of national betrayer since January 2009.
 
@asad71 Bhai, I need your kind opinion on this issue.

Please note above article. I am seeing some contradicting version of events that led up to 25th March 1971.

1. Some say Sheikh Mujib was involved in Agartala Conspiracy, at least indirectly, together with Indian Intelligence for some years before the trial in 1968, others say that he was not and people are using a dead person who cannot speak for himself, to legitimize their own involvement in Agartala conspiracy, I think you have this opinion
2. From above Article, it seems that Mujib never had plans to declare UDI (Unilateral Declaration of Independence), as he never wanted to break Pakistan and create independent Bangladesh, instead he wanted full autonomy of East Pakistan. When he was released from jail in Pakistan. Bhutto talked with him about still retaining some tie with the eastern wing:
http://dawn.com/2012/06/10/a-leaf-from-history-mujib-begins-a-new-life/

Mujib gave him no answer till he arrived at London. At the airport he had some discussions with someone (I forget his name) and in that discussion he was still talking about autonomy, probably considering Bhutto's proposal, before he was briefed about what went on in Bangladesh in the 9 months since he went to jail. After briefing, he understood the full situation about independent Bangladesh and sent answer to Bhutto that confederation was no longer possible.

I think your version of events match with version no. 2, if not, please give us a full account of how it was with Mujib. That will clarify a lot of issues about the history of that period.

The 2nd thing I find puzzling is Bhashani's role in all this. Bhashani, it looks like, staunchly believed in secession and independence of East Pakistan, but not with India's help. It was his 11 point movement that brought the fall of Ayub's govt. in 1969 and the release of Mujib from Agartala case. The result of this movement was that Mujib became the most popular young leader for East Pakistan. While Bhashani boycotted the election in 1970, Mujib's AL participated and got land slide victory. Much of that credit goes to Bhashani it seems.

Bengali Nationalism and Anti-Ayub Movement : A Study of the Role of Students | Mahboob Hussain - Academia.edu
h1p4
Six point movement - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Dak Bangla Intelligence Scan : Bangladesh: Moulana Bhashani and the people

In summary it seems that Bhashani was a more far sighted leader and thus foresaw the separation of two wings of Pakistan and openly advocated for it, but Mujib held on to the idea of autonomy till his release from jail from Pakistan. Bhashani remained anti-India till his death, while Mujib was pro-India and had been working with Indians long before 1971, although he never trusted Indians fully. And it was Bhashani and his 11 point movement that made Mujib popular and it was Bhashani's election boycott that gave Mujib and his AL almost all electoral seats in East Pakistan in 1970.

But Bhashani was too old and could not finish what he started it seems. I discuss that in a different thread:
http://www.defence.pk/forums/bangla...-politicians-history-bangladesh-landmass.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:
@asad71 Bhai, I need your kind opinion on this issue.

Please note above article. I am seeing some contradicting version of events that led up to 25th March 1971.

1. Some say Sheikh Mujib was involved in Agartala Conspiracy, at least indirectly, together with Indian Intelligence for some years before the trial in 1968, others say that he was not and people are using a dead person who cannot speak for himself, to legitimize their own involvement in Agartala conspiracy, I think you have this opinion
2. From above Article, it seems that Mujib never had plans to declare UDI (Unilateral Declaration of Independence), as he never wanted to break Pakistan and create independent Bangladesh, instead he wanted full autonomy of East Pakistan. When he was released from jail in Pakistan. Bhutto talked with him about still retaining some tie with the eastern wing:
A leaf from history: Mujib begins a new life | DAWN.COM

Mujib gave him no answer till he arrived at London. At the airport he had some discussions with someone (I forget his name) and in that discussion he was still talking about autonomy, probably considering Bhutto's proposal, before he was briefed about what went on in Bangladesh in the 9 months since he went to jail. After briefing, he understood the full situation about independent Bangladesh and sent answer to Bhutto that confederation was no longer possible.

I think your version of events match with version no. 2, if not, please give us a full account of how it was with Mujib. That will clarify a lot of issues about the history of that period.

The 2nd thing I find puzzling is Bhashani's role in all this. Bhashani, it looks like, staunchly believed in secession and independence of East Pakistan, but not with India's help. It was his 11 point movement that brought the fall of Ayub's govt. in 1969 and the release of Mujib from Agartala case. The result of this movement was that Mujib became the most popular young leader for East Pakistan. While Bhashani boycotted the election in 1970, Mujib's AL participated and got land slide victory. Much of that credit goes to Bhashani it seems.

Bengali Nationalism and Anti-Ayub Movement : A Study of the Role of Students | Mahboob Hussain - Academia.edu
h1p4
Six point movement - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Dak Bangla Intelligence Scan : Bangladesh: Moulana Bhashani and the people

In summary it seems that Bhashani was a more far sighted leader and thus foresaw the separation of two wings of Pakistan and openly advocated for it, but Mujib held on to the idea of autonomy till his release from jail from Pakistan. Bhashani remained anti-India till his death, while Mujib was pro-India and had been working with Indians long before 1971, although he never trusted Indians fully. And it was Bhashani and his 11 point movement that made Mujib popular and it was Bhashani's election boycott that gave Mujib and his AL almost all electoral seats in East Pakistan in 1970.

But Bhashani was too old and could not finish what he started it seems. I discuss that in a different thread:
http://www.defence.pk/forums/bangla...-politicians-history-bangladesh-landmass.html


1. In truth, till the day he was gunned down, Sheikh had believed in The Two Nation Theory - that the Muslims of Hindustan were a different nation. This was tested to the extreme when we found him steadfast in this belief in spite of the immense pressure exerted on him to declare UDI on 07 March 1971. Like the seasoned politician he was he had delivered an outstanding speech full of jugglery of words and covert contradictions - not forgetting to end end with the slogans " Joy Bangla, Joy Pakistan, Pakistan Zindabad". His famous Six Point Program was nothing but a return to the Lahore Resolution, 23 March 1940.

2. Agaratala Conspiracy could hardly be called a conspiracy unless ISI Chief Akbar made this into one to interdict Sheikh's political progress. In the bargain, this botched up ISI counter-conspiracy catapulted Sheikh into The Leader of the Bengalees. Henceforth Sheikh was the Ceaser of E Bengal / BD till his death.

3. Hardly anything has been written or spoken publicly about this conspiracy - because there was hardly anything of material to talk about or write about. At best it was a low level effort by RAW contacted people to begin something. FYI, at this point in time RAW was also raw like ISI in these enterprises. Steward Mujib of PIA was apparently the chief or the spokesman of the group that had sneaked into Agartala through a border that was practically unguarded back then.

4. No, Sheikh was not at all involved in this conspiracy. He has never claimed this himself. However, the conspirators would have hoped to rope him in as an umbrella if they were successful. Gen Akbar found it convenient to construct the group of conspirators with few EBDO'ed / dismissed civil servants who were obviously anti-govt, and some junior military officers who would at best air their grievances loudly.

5. Lieut Shawkat Ali, Ordnance was one such. He is the only person who has come out openly after all these decades to claim that Sheikh was involved with them. If considered in the context of his advanced age and position in BAL, it is not difficult to understand why he is saying this at this particular time. Already the Dy Speaker he has ambitions to go further upwards. Hasina was never enamored of him owing to his ant-BAL and pro-BAKSHAL position when Zia had opened up the parties. Agartala gives him mileage in BAL and with India.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Making a country like Pakistan(1947) was a mistake. @kalu_miah

You mean you'd prefer to live in India rather? :D

Without Jinnah's leadership, and without the All India Muslim League, Bangladesh would never have had existed in the first place.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
4. No, Sheikh was not at all involved in this conspiracy. He has never claimed this himself. However, the conspirators would have hoped to rope him in as an umbrella if they were successful. Gen Akbar found it convenient to construct the group of conspirators with few EBDO'ed / dismissed civil servants who were obviously anti-govt, and some junior military officers who would at best air their grievances loudly.

5. Lieut Shawkat Ali, Ordnance was one such. He is the only person who has come out openly after all these decades to claim that Sheikh was involved with them. If considered in the context of his advanced age and position in BAL, it is not difficult to understand why he is saying this at this particular time. Already the Dy Speaker he has ambitions to go further upwards. Hasina was never enamored of him owing to his ant-BAL and pro-BAKSHAL position when Zia had opened up the parties. Agartala gives him mileage in BAL and with India.

Here are Col. Ali's own words just for clarification :D
The name “Agartala Conspiracy Case”, is a misnomer. The actual name of the case filed against us was State vs Sheikh Mujibur Rahman and Others. A total of 35 accused, including Sheikh Mujib.

The name of Agartala became associated with the case due to a small incident. A two member delegation from our group went to Agartala, India, to meet Indian authorities to discuss with them our plans and ask them if they could aid us.

The accusation against us was 100 paragraphs long one, out of which only one paragraph was devoted to this tiny event. Until recently it was believed this case was a ploy to get rid of Sheikh Mujib, when in reality it was a case filed on very concrete and true accusations. We did conspire for secession of East Pakistan! The accusations were 100 percent true.
In Conversation with Col (retd) Shawkat Ali « Dhaka Courier
 
It was not a conspiracy any more than the two nation theory was.

It was just the pressing need of the time. Something inevitable.

We are proud to have helped the Bangladeshis achieve their independence. Good luck for your future.
 
1. In truth, till the day he was gunned down, Sheikh had believed in The Two Nation Theory - that the Muslims of Hindustan were a different nation. This was tested to the extreme when we found him steadfast in this belief in spite of the immense pressure exerted on him to declare UDI on 07 March 1971. Like the seasoned politician he was he had delivered an outstanding speech full of jugglery of words and covert contradictions - not forgetting to end end with the slogans " Joy Bangla, Joy Pakistan, Pakistan Zindabad". His famous Six Point Program was nothing but a return to the Lahore Resolution, 23 March 1940.

2. Agaratala Conspiracy could hardly be called a conspiracy unless ISI Chief Akbar made this into one to interdict Sheikh's political progress. In the bargain, this botched up ISI counter-conspiracy catapulted Sheikh into The Leader of the Bengalees. Henceforth Sheikh was the Ceaser of E Bengal / BD till his death.

3. Hardly anything has been written or spoken publicly about this conspiracy - because there was hardly anything of material to talk about or write about. At best it was a low level effort by RAW contacted people to begin something. FYI, at this point in time RAW was also raw like ISI in these enterprises. Steward Mujib of PIA was apparently the chief or the spokesman of the group that had sneaked into Agartala through a border that was practically unguarded back then.

4. No, Sheikh was not at all involved in this conspiracy. He has never claimed this himself. However, the conspirators would have hoped to rope him in as an umbrella if they were successful. Gen Akbar found it convenient to construct the group of conspirators with few EBDO'ed / dismissed civil servants who were obviously anti-govt, and some junior military officers who would at best air their grievances loudly.

5. Lieut Shawkat Ali, Ordnance was one such. He is the only person who has come out openly after all these decades to claim that Sheikh was involved with them. If considered in the context of his advanced age and position in BAL, it is not difficult to understand why he is saying this at this particular time. Already the Dy Speaker he has ambitions to go further upwards. Hasina was never enamored of him owing to his ant-BAL and pro-BAKSHAL position when Zia had opened up the parties. Agartala gives him mileage in BAL and with India.

Thanks for your excellent post. That pretty much clears it up. Shawkat Ali is a shameless liar and his lie that Sheikh Mujib was actually involved in this Agartala scheme, created this whole confusion. Like you said, I now fully believe that he is lying for political advantage, just like many politicians throughout the world.

So my current impression, looking at the information I have uncovered so far is that Sheikh Mujib was not involved in this treason case, he did not commit treason.

This means that Pakistan military rulers at the time may have used a small and minor Agartala case to frame Sheikh Mujib, but eventually had to free him after 11 point mass agitation led by Bhashani. So essentially it was a politically motivated case to suppress the call for autonomy, that backfired and catapulted Sheikh Mujib to peak of popularity and allowed him to win landslide election victory in 1971.

It was not a conspiracy any more than the two nation theory was.

It was just the pressing need of the time. Something inevitable.

We are proud to have helped the Bangladeshis achieve their independence. Good luck for your future.

Agartala scheme was an incident of treason, plain and simple. Sheikh Mujib was not involved in it. But the case was filed to frame and suppress some political leaders by Pakistan military rulers at the time. Agartala scheme, a RAW project, had no connection to the independence of Bangladesh, a result of a war of liberation initiated as a reaction to Operation Searchlight army crackdown on 25th March, 1971.
 
I just can't believe that they let him go for such a huge conspiracy. It was probably a big Fail attempt by the political leaders
 
Agartala scheme was an incident of treason, plain and simple. Sheikh Mujib was not involved in it. But the case was filed to frame and suppress some political leaders by Pakistan military rulers at the time. Agartala scheme, a RAW project had no connection to the independence of Bangladesh, a result of a war of liberation initiated as a reaction to Operation Searchlight army crackdown on 25th March, 1971.

That's what you think and you are entitled to it.

The vast majority of Bangadeshis are happy with their independence despite all those sacrifices.

Regarding treason, that depends on who is looking.

For us, the two nation theory folks were traitors.

For Pakistanis, the Bangladesh demanding people were traitors.

For Bangladeshis, the PA was a occupying brutal force and the Razakaars and Jamaatis are traitors.

All of these are correct options for someone or the other.
 
That's what you think and you are entitled to it.

The vast majority of Bangadeshis are happy with their independence despite all those sacrifices.

Regarding treason, that depends on who is looking.

For us, the two nation theory folks were traitors.

For Pakistanis, the Bangladesh demanding people were traitors.

For Bangladeshis, the PA was a occupying brutal force and the Razakaars and Jamaatis are traitors.

All of these are correct options for someone or the other.

It does not depend on who is looking. A treason, is a treason, is a treason, there is no getting around it, under the established law at the time, recognized as valid by all population of then East Pakistan. Those people who conspired with RAW had committed treason. Sheikh Mujib played no role in this act of treason.

Bangladesh came into being with the Declaration of Independence made by Zia on 26th March, 1971, as a reaction to the commencement of Operation Searchlight, the brutal crackdown you are referring to and before that date any act of conspiracy with a recognized enemy state govt. was an act of treason.
 
It does not depend on who is looking. A treason, is a treason, is a treason, there is no getting around it, under the established law at the time, recognized as valid by all population of then East Pakistan. Those people who conspired with RAW had committed treason. Sheikh Mujib played no role in this act of treason.

Bangladesh came into being with the Declaration of Independence made by Zia on 26th March, 1971, as a reaction to the commencement of Operation Searchlight, the brutal crackdown you are referring to and before that date any act of conspiracy with a recognized enemy state govt. was an act of treason.

It does.

Many astute Bangladeshis had understood that they will need to find their own destiny separate from the Western wing. They had to make a start and if meant a covert start, so be it.

Most independence movements had to be covert by necessity.

Treason against the government of the day is not the same thing as treason against the country and its people. And if the (remote, unelected, dictatorial) government is one that looks down at the people, throwing it out is all the more justified.
 
I do not think we have wasted time looking at the history of our nation in those critical years. Now see the face of the treasonous liar who has created unnecessary confusion and soul searching on our part by falsely claiming that Sheikh Mujib was in his team:

FarahAli-30.jpg

Col (retd) Shawkat Ali
 
Soul searching is required for a nation to find its soul.

It can only remove the existing confusion, never create confusion.
 
Back
Top Bottom