Yerusalem 4880 Kms
FULL MEMBER
- Joined
- Jul 31, 2017
- Messages
- 844
- Reaction score
- -8
- Country
- Location
Still continue the competition and they lost one wheel due to collision with Iranian tank.What's there to celebrate, **** vermin ?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Still continue the competition and they lost one wheel due to collision with Iranian tank.What's there to celebrate, **** vermin ?
Being heavy its just an excuse. Lobbies did same with Tejas, did same with Arjun or even with ISRO.
Test pilots of tejas were killed in doubtful conditions ? how ? ISRO scientist were killed ? how ?
None from govt spoke about it.
On trucks like Tejas.Being heavy is a problem if the terrain is unsuitable. In an Indo Pak conflict, the armies will face a huge number of canals, boggy fields and rivers. How is the Arjun going to navigate through them?
I specifically asked about weight of those TANKS, please if you can enlighten me.
Already giving thanks from my side.
Not invited because of Indian cries.Why is Pakistan not in this competition?
That figures !Not invited because of Indian cries.
During Musharaf era they discussed even assembled two tanks T80UD but later Russian backed of because India approach Russia same r@ndi rona.That figures !
actually, at beginning of the competition, the India was ahead, they run the Tank too hard, it causes the engine failure!
Indians (Hindus) are very cunning people they knew in case of war between India and China, India would appear as defeated but they are still want war (not full scale though) for achieving two thing.I find it more then slightly amusing how Indian's are making fun of the Chinese. The only time India has faced a enemy it's own size was China in 1962 and it was bent over, raped and sent crying home. The only military success they ever have had was when they joined in with Banglas to defeat a country six times smaller - Pakistan in 1972. Even then they had to take advantage of the Bangla Mukhti Bahini fighters. To defeat Pakistan it took six to one advantage and even then teamed up with Banglas when Pakistan was caught in what was a civil war.
And now they are acting big in front of China.
Agreed. Pakistan has consistenly proven to excel at making catastrophic decisions. Three of them are -They did the same thing during 1962
China did offer Pakistan to participate 1962 war and grab Kashmir but Russia send warning to join Indian in that case and at that time US also warn Pakistan for doing that because they fear Russian involvement and world war.Agreed. Pakistan has consistenly proven to excel at making catastrophic decisions. Three of them are -
(i) Should have launched "Police Action" to grab Kashmir in 1947 using full scale military attak exactly when India launched "Police Action" when it grabbed State of Hyderabad.
(ii) Should have launched full scale war on India in 1962 when India was being raped by PLA in Sino-Indian war.
(iii) Should have launched a small scale invasion [in concert with US) of Kabul in 2001 to preclude Northern Alliance grabbing power. No Abdullah Abdullah. No Amraullah Saleh.
But then our leaders always miss the boat don't they?
Good points. Your strategic genius is hard to match.Agreed. Pakistan has consistenly proven to excel at making catastrophic decisions. Three of them are -
(i) Should have launched "Police Action" to grab Kashmir in 1947 using full scale military attak exactly when India launched "Police Action" when it grabbed State of Hyderabad.
(ii) Should have launched full scale war on India in 1962 when India was being raped by PLA in Sino-Indian war. You hit the enemy when they are down like we were in 1971.
(iii) Should have launched a small scale invasion [in concert with US) of Kabul in 2001 to preclude Northern Alliance grabbing power. No Abdullah Abdullah. No Amraullah Saleh.
But then our leaders always miss the boat don't they?