pakistani342
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Jan 20, 2013
- Messages
- 3,485
- Reaction score
- 6
- Country
- Location
TBH Pakistan splitting was on the cards i think . No country can survive while being 2500 km apart with an enemy in between . So we had it coming . ISI has been vilified alot hence has acquired somewhat of a mythical status within Spy agencies . Terms like ' a state within a state '' doesn't help either . RAW's success has been to cut itself off from Mainstream, not many people know about it .
ISI is like Jaguar F-Type with lots of exhaust note and brutality while RAW is more akin to a sedan . Both will get things done but in a different way .
Yes that is true -- Pakistan and Bangladesh were more or less untenable as one entity
Do you have any idea the kind of Shit ISI has been involved in for over 70 years? There are going to be mistakes on the way for every success .
ISI (like Pakistani General staff) confuses tactical gymnastics with strategic wins (partly because of Pakistanis size -- smaller countries have a tendency to think tactically) -- case in point Israel. Israel was not able to leverage her tactical wins into lasting strategic advantage. For Israel it was its advances in tech, industry and commerce that bought it lasting strategic security.
RAW (like the Indian General staff) has a better strategic sense
For example the CIA has many tactical wins -- but strategically have they been effective for the US -- I'd say the jury is out. For short term tactical wins -- we generate a lot of hate in the world for ourselves.