What's new

Abe pushes for Japan to become permanent member of UNSC

The question is if India can make it, then Africa, South America will also require one. How to cater for them? India always label itself as the presentative of the third world, so it must give some room for the two.

When China become the permanent member of UNSC, if I may know?
 
.
When China become the permanent member of UNSC, if I may know?
1945. China didn't become, it was a permanent member since UN is formed. In 1971 it was PRC succeeded ROC's position, where is different from India.
 
.
need a U.N peace council as an alternative for peaceful countries like Japan who use charity and development rather than force.
The UN SC should now have permanent members representing all regions:

US - Americas
Russia - East Asia
Japan - Asia Pacific
India - South Asia
China - Central Asia
Germany/France - Europe
South Africa - African continent
Australia.
 
.
disagree,for me India is much more eligible to become the permanent member of UNSC

first, the most important one is India doesn't have any strategic Allies, hence her voice is much more neutral than most of other member. And she can act as the balancer within UNSC which has been dominated by certain party.
second, India is a respectable powerful country say, militarily, economically and have cultural influences on par with the other five Power
third, India is a Nuclear armed country, hence she has deterrence and can act's with freedom without worries from any intimidation from other parties (externally)
 
.
The UN SC should now have permanent members representing all regions:

US - Americas
Russia - East Asia
Japan - Asia Pacific
PakisTan- South Asia because India's US boot shiner.
China - Central Asia
Germany/France - Europe
South Africa - African continent
Australia.
 
. .
I disagree the "permanent member" term.
Agree to revise the list periodly
 
Last edited:
.
Though I wholeheartedly support Japan but she is not yet ready. Okinawa is still under US occupation and if a country could not get her own territory free from foreign occupation in 70 years, what and how much positive role she will play in UNSC in the presence of US?
 
.
Though I wholeheartedly support Japan but she is not yet ready. Okinawa is still under US occupation and if a country could not free he territory from foreign occupation in 70 years, what positive role she will play in UNSC?

Same to Germany.

But UNSC stand for peacekeeping action and fund for those.
 
.
I support Brazil and India. UNSC needs more developing nations and the two nations also have ability.

is only Brazil currently lacking in Military clouts compared to other parties. While we looking at the other Five Power, all of them at some degree has Power projection capability.
 
. .
need a U.N peace council as an alternative for peaceful countries like Japan who use charity and development rather than force.
Don't forget. Today's friend may meant tomorrow's enemies.

Remember how US gives China the UN permanent seat of ROC and end up CCP OF China. Same as 70years ago both US and Japan were killing each other's. Now become friend, you will not know suddenly Jaoan turn hostile towards US. Then you have Japan, China And Russia against the west.
 
. .
Vietnam can be UNSC permanent member better then INDIA. Vietnam kick France and US out. Lol India lost to Pakistan if no USA help, Pakistan would have kick their Arshe. So Vietnam should be UNSC better then INDIA. UNSC with India there, will be nasty all day they will show everyone their cow dung and cow urine. Lol, if Vietnam the P5 can smell Beef noodle. What you guys think.
I think you should improve your English :pop:
 
.
Interesting. @BoQ77 my friend, can you make a new thread with a poll option in the World Affairs section?

You can make the voting options something like:

-Brazil
-Germany
-India
-Japan
-Someone else
-No one

Someone can then print the result and send it to the UN.
 
.

Country Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom