Abii
SENIOR MEMBER
![](/styles/default/xenforo/ranks/MajorGeneral.jpg)
- Joined
- Nov 15, 2010
- Messages
- 6,690
- Reaction score
- -13
- Country
- Location
Abdullah, this all boils down to logic, let's see if you have it or not.I don't think Pakistan is the only country which has such problem. This happens and can happen everywhere ...
Similarly, Iran never managed to secure its frontline.
I used to cross the Canada/US border at least 2-3 times a year when I was living in Vancouver. I would go through the relevant security checkpoints on the Canadian side, followed by even more stringent security once I got to the American side. On my way back it would be the same. Security on the American side, then the Canadian side.
Now, Imagine one side not having a check point. Worse yet, imagine one side having crook border guards that are willing to shut their eyes to everything and even cooperate with whoever. Let's call that hypothetical side the Canadian side. I would be able to organize an armed gang, pay off the guards on my side (if there were any), monitor the American side from a distance and mount an attack after a plan was hatched. I could then quickly kidnap the few border guards on the American side and drag them back to Canada without anybody coming after me.
That's the story here. I can't dumb it down anymore.
A border check point is only able to function if the checkpoint on the other side is also functioning and doing its job. Without both sides doing their job, one becomes an easy target. A border check point isn't a military stronghold. It can easily be overrun. By having both sides checking their own side of the border, nobody would be able to cross with weapons and nobody could bring hostages back to its own side, thus making such activities impossible. Pakistan has no control over its borders.