Irfan Baloch
SENIOR MODERATOR
- Joined
- Apr 12, 2009
- Messages
- 20,975
- Reaction score
- 214
- Country
- Location
So I came across this unknown character. Taha Sadique
an English version of a French News Channel asked him to explain further about the cause of these recent attacks in and around Quetta pointing at the attacks on the Lawyers police academy and attack on this shrine.
the last two attacks had been already claimed by Islamic state but Taha Sadique went in a trance and recited a well trodden line..
"it is because of Pakistan military's policy of good and bad Taliban where it only fights those that are fighting the state of Pakistan which doesn't please Afghanistan (and its allies) so these attacks are the results of this policy....
what is that son of a motherless goat talking about I wondered?
why the same laws dont apply on Afghan thugs in Kabul? why is it ok if they let the BLA thrive? why is it ok that their guests along with their extended family are running the camps against Pakistan?
and then again, I wonder.. if all this sarcasm and talk is just a smoke screen. .. the punishment of Pakistan is regardless of the alleged Pakistan's policy towards Afghan taliban. perhaps the violence in Pakistan suits some powers and this good bad jibe is just a happy coincidence.
no where in the world.. a country and its security forces have been criticised for fighting ONLY the enemy that threatens it and fights it. but rules are different for Pakistan.
an English version of a French News Channel asked him to explain further about the cause of these recent attacks in and around Quetta pointing at the attacks on the Lawyers police academy and attack on this shrine.
the last two attacks had been already claimed by Islamic state but Taha Sadique went in a trance and recited a well trodden line..
"it is because of Pakistan military's policy of good and bad Taliban where it only fights those that are fighting the state of Pakistan which doesn't please Afghanistan (and its allies) so these attacks are the results of this policy....
what is that son of a motherless goat talking about I wondered?
- is TTP/ Daesh not attacking Pakistani civilians & army?
- so why is he criticising Pakistan army for fighting TTP & Daesh?
- are Afghan Taliban attacking Pakistani people and Pakistan army? if so when did they?
- why is he criticising Pakistan army for only focusing on those that are hurting Pakistan?
- by terming these attacks as a consequence ...is he implying that Afghan government and its guests punishing Pakistan?
- is he indirectly justifying these attacks by Daesh because Pakistan army is not fighting Afghan Taliban and instead facilitating its leadership with the peace dialogue?
- or this brain dead heir to the goat herd just implying that Pakistan army is willingly allowing Afghan taliban to attack it and its people? (despite the fact that all attacks are either claimed by BLA, TTP or Daesh/ LeJ?).
why the same laws dont apply on Afghan thugs in Kabul? why is it ok if they let the BLA thrive? why is it ok that their guests along with their extended family are running the camps against Pakistan?
and then again, I wonder.. if all this sarcasm and talk is just a smoke screen. .. the punishment of Pakistan is regardless of the alleged Pakistan's policy towards Afghan taliban. perhaps the violence in Pakistan suits some powers and this good bad jibe is just a happy coincidence.
no where in the world.. a country and its security forces have been criticised for fighting ONLY the enemy that threatens it and fights it. but rules are different for Pakistan.