A Radioactive Situation in the middle east

[PeaceGen]

@peacefan

Don't decide a NATO+Israel alliance by yourself. Israel is not a member. I don't think any NATO member besides US is going to devote themselves for Israel's interests.

I'd say that Israel may not be an official member, but it's close enough.
And most of the EU *does* support Israel, just not as visibly or unconditionally as the US does.

 

[-SINAN-]

I'd say that Israel may not be an official member, but it's close enough.
And most of the EU *does* support Israel, just not as visibly or unconditionally as the US does.

I still don't agree with you and any European country going war for Israel..... please

 

[PeaceGen]

I still don't agree with you and any European country going war for Israel..... please

And I think doing so is in the best interest of Israel, the US, the EU, AND countries like Turkey.

Plus, with EU+US support, that war against Iran (if it needs to be fought at all) is likely to be cleaner and over more quickly.

 

[Serpentine]

I do not know your level of education, but you seem to ignore all the facts and only report what you hear in the news.
Reality is bigger than that, to give you an example, the US and Israel can not dare attack Iran, it is just too powerful for them in any way, air, land or sea, ask or rather read what the American experts know and say... and even if they choose to use the ultimate nuclear option, not one single country in the Area will allow them, just because of the radioactive fallouts, let alone the promesses that Chinees and Russian highest ranking General have made to start WW3 with the States and Europe if Iran is attacked, not for their particular friendship or love for Iran but for the sake of their economies and the world economy, so indeed NATO can call Iran dangerous, you know now why, it is Europe's an American frustrations...
Apart from that the Iranian supremacy in the Persian golf and around it, it can infringe some too heavy losses on NATO that can not be acceptable for Europe and the US, like destroying completely the 5Th US fleet and any other fleet that will show up around. We are not talking about the madness of the thought of invading Iran, NATO will need to have 200 million soldiers to be able to win completely a conventional war against the 20 million (minimum) Iranian Armed forces. So please learn about history, warfare and facts and than talk tough,Netherlands won't stand one day on its own against Iran in the Persian Gulf.

They (Israel especially) have been barking too much for years, and since the barking dog, seldom bites, we conclude that they can't do anything except threatening and sanctions.

 

[PeaceGen]

They (Israel especially) have been barking too much for years, and since the barking dog, seldom bites, we conclude that they can't do anything except threatening and sanctions.

you're mistaken.

delaying military action until Iran actually has nuke bomb parts or production facilities for those parts, is part of the necessary strategy to retain as much of the moral highground as possible.

when nato/israeli intelligence agencies acquire real evidence of the above, then you'll find out that the bark is indeed followed by a bite.

 

[Luffy 500]

Ready to be stolen by islamic radicals.


Nuff said.

Nuke bomb is not a candy that it can be stolen by non-state X Y Z org. This whole notion that a group can steal nukes is holly wood fiction only suited to neo-con agenda. Btw terrorist already have a bomb , almost 200 of them. The terrorist in Tel Aviv already have some 200 bombs with 11000 KM ICBMs to deliver those.

 

[PeaceGen]

Nuke bomb is not a candy that it can be stolen by non-state X Y Z org. This whole notion that a group can steal nukes is holly wood fiction only suited to neo-con agenda. Btw terrorist already have a bomb , almost 200 of them. The terrorist in Tel Aviv already have some 200 bombs with 11000 KM ICBMs to deliver those.

You have your views, we have ours. I've informed you all plenty now.