What's new

A Pro for the Pakistani Army?

fatman17

PDF THINK TANK: CONSULTANT
Joined
Apr 24, 2007
Messages
32,563
Reaction score
98
Country
Pakistan
Location
Pakistan
A Pro for the Pakistani Army?
Ashfaq Kiyani May Do What Pervez Musharraf Couldn't

By David Ignatius
Thursday, January 24, 2008

RAWALPINDI, Pakistan -- As you approach the entrance to the Pakistani army's general headquarters here, the dusty roads and traffic jams give way to the order of a military compound. Even the shrubs are manicured into the precise shapes of topiary.

The headquarters are only a 10-minute drive from the park where Benazir Bhutto was murdered in December. But in political terms, that is a world apart.

At its best, the Pakistani army has been a symbol of order and unity for this chaotic country in the 60 years since Pakistan was founded. At its worst, as in recent years when Pervez Musharraf was simultaneously president and army chief of staff, the military has been a politicized force that has added to the country's instability.

Gen. Ashfaq Kiyani, the new chief of staff, received a senior American military visitor Tuesday at his white stucco headquarters here. Tall and dark, dressed in his army sweater and khaki trousers, Kiyani looked every inch the soldier. To a great extent, Pakistan's future depends on whether he behaves as one -- and can rally the army and the nation to defeat an insurgency that threatens Pakistan's stability.

Kiyani's visitor was Adm. William Fallon, chief of Central Command, which includes Pakistan in its area of responsibility. Fallon later outlined his hour-long discussion with the Pakistani general. Fallon's account supports other recent evidence that Kiyani is a professional soldier who wants to rebuild an army whose reputation and morale were tarnished during the Musharraf years.

Fallon said that the new chief of staff "sees the army as an apolitical force" and that Kiyani pledged that "he wants free and open elections" on Feb. 18, a vote that was delayed after Bhutto's murder. In contrast with the Musharraf years, Fallon said, "I would expect the army gets a lot more attention now because the guy who's in charge only has one job."

"I'm encouraged that he seems to understand the necessity of doing counterinsurgency," Fallon continued. He said Kiyani will try to reorient the army from its focus on the external threat posed by India to greater recognition of the internal danger posed by Muslim extremists, especially the al-Qaeda terrorists who operate out of the Waziristan region in northwestern Pakistan, known here as the Federally Administered Tribal Areas, or FATA.

Musharraf tried to subdue these tribal areas by marching troops in -- and ultimately was forced to accept a humiliating truce with the rebels. Kiyani plans a different approach, more in keeping with America's new ideas about counterinsurgency. "He knows that you can only do so much with military force," Fallon said. To contain an insurgency, "you need to take care of the population" through economic and social development.

Fallon said the United States plans to work with Kiyani and the Pakistani army on new programs that will bring more economic growth and the rule of law to the tribal areas, which since the days of the British Raj have usually been treated as ungovernable. The United States will help the Pakistanis train and expand the Frontier Corps, a local constabulary in the tribal areas that is now toothless. The United States also wants to provide training and equipment for Pakistani special forces, which would make it easier for them to operate jointly with their American counterparts.

The danger for Kiyani is that, like Musharraf, he will be seen as so close to the United States that he will lose credibility in his own country. Fallon recognized that problem when he cautioned about unilateral American actions that undercut Pakistani sovereignty. "I suspect there's a fair amount of sensitivity to a very visible U.S. footprint inside the country," he said.

Kiyani has shown other signs that he wants to lead the army away from its politicized role under Musharraf. He famously declared 2008 "the year of the soldier," and he backed up that call with two directives this month. One bans Pakistani generals from meeting with politicians without the chief of staff's approval. A second directive threatens to recall current or former officers who got plum jobs in civilian ministries during Musharraf's tenure as chief of staff. Kiyani has also appointed as the army's public spokesman Maj. Gen. Athar Abbas, whose three brothers are among Pakistan's most respected journalists.

The stakes in Kiyani's success could not be greater for the United States. Pakistan is a nuclear-armed nation facing a growing Islamic insurgency. With a new chief of staff, Pakistan at least seems to have ended its state of denial about the seriousness of its problems. That's a beginning.
 
Hi,

Pakistan army has a problem with its image in its relationship with the u s. To overcome that, they need a better marketing technique. They need very well versed civilians who are extremely articulate at redefining the army's point of view. Where it was, where it is at,now, and
where it needs to be in the future and what it needs to do to get there. who it is going to seek help and assistance from and why does it need help and training if at all it needs assistance. What are the shortcomings of our army, why they are there and how can they be overcome.

We will have to explain to the ordinary citizen that the army personale are people also---they have their familes and children and loved ones as well just like anybody else. Even though they have promised to lay down their lives for the welbeing of the nation they cannot be just written off and condemned for the failure of the politicians.

They must be given credit for being there when they are needed the most---like at SUKKUR BARAGE and then during the earthquake disaster relief---plus there are myriads of other things they have done---like the general who was put incharge of the failing steel mill---he turned it around in a short time---and so many other things. Somebody needs to counter the book that the pakistani woman has written---I am forgetting her name---. There is no reason that our millitary needs to be bashed all the time by the NGO's and the politicians. If there is critiscism then a solution needs to be presented as well.

Pakistani army has an extremely tough job at hand---pakistanis need to learn and need to be told to appreciate our assets.
 
I think MK.... What that Women wrote about ARMY cannot Change the thinking of atleast 85% of our population. People still love Army and Trust Army. Whatever the media or press says about Army is not going to change people's thinking.... No by far!
 
I think MK.... What that Women wrote about ARMY cannot Change the thinking of atleast 85% of our population. People still love Army and Trust Army. Whatever the media or press says about Army is not going to change people's thinking.... No by far!

Well said. The people of Pakistan know what this Army has done for us.
 
I think MK.... What that Women wrote about ARMY cannot Change the thinking of atleast 85% of our population. People still love Army and Trust Army. Whatever the media or press says about Army is not going to change people's thinking.... No by far!

not only 85% i say more then 90% peoples like army because if see our past every thing was established in the Rule of Army .. the Industries grow up in the Rule of Ayub khan .. the milirary power was come in the Rule of Zia ul Haq and in Mushi Rule we more polish it ..

and on the other hand Our politican from top to bottom they are not in reliable they always scary from the US because they love $$$ many of them have dual nationalites they can easily fly away any time they come here to earn money nothing else .... none of a single one is senciear with the country
 
Musharraf tried to subdue these tribal areas by marching troops in -- and ultimately was forced to accept a humiliating truce with the rebels. Kiyani plans a different approach, more in keeping with America's new ideas about counterinsurgency. "He knows that you can only do so much with military force," Fallon said. To contain an insurgency, "you need to take care of the population" through economic and social development.

There is nothing new in this Musharraf also used force as well as initiated massive development projects in tribal areas during past 8 years.


Fallon said the United States plans to work with Kiyani and the Pakistani army on new programs that will bring more economic growth and the rule of law to the tribal areas, which since the days of the British Raj have usually been treated as ungovernable. The United States will help the Pakistanis train and expand the Frontier Corps, a local constabulary in the tribal areas that is now toothless. The United States also wants to provide training and equipment for Pakistani special forces, which would make it easier for them to operate jointly with their American counterparts.

Well it was also in the air that US wants to use Kiyani for own agenda and hence now all the decisions will made by direct dealing with Kiyani now it has to bee seen how much Kiyani is going to toe US line.

As far FC training is concerned the US had put forward this plan already to Musharraf and it was already apporved so it has nothing to do with taking over of Kiyani.

One more thing dont know if you guys know it or not this is not that much simple plan as it sounds beacuse its not only the matter of training FC but US has already planned to recruite tribesmen directly and train them to fight against what US says Al-qaeda and Taliban.

Now this would be very crucial for Pakistan in my opinion.


The danger for Kiyani is that, like Musharraf, he will be seen as so close to the United States that he will lose credibility in his own country. Fallon recognized that problem when he cautioned about unilateral American actions that undercut Pakistani sovereignty. "I suspect there's a fair amount of sensitivity to a very visible U.S. footprint inside the country," he said.
indeed if he went all out rather anyone who goes all out for US will be facing same problem. hence its more advisble for US to instead of hurling threats at Pakistan she should try to understand the probelms and act accordingly and also accept that fact that Pakistan has done more than its share in WoT.

Kiyani has also appointed as the army's public spokesman Maj. Gen. Athar Abbas, whose three brothers are among Pakistan's most respected journalists.

:) the author has misinterpted the replacement of DG ISPR, Wahid Arshad what as a journalist i can say is replaced beacuse he did not have the flair for coresponding with media affectively and Athar Abbas if im not wrong knows Pashto also so he is a better choice.

The stakes in Kiyani's success could not be greater for the United States. Pakistan is a nuclear-armed nation facing a growing Islamic insurgency. With a new chief of staff, Pakistan at least seems to have ended its state of denial about the seriousness of its problems. That's a beginning.

That is the mentality on part of US and westerners that is the biggest hurdle. and reason for creation of problems for them.
 
I think MK.... What that Women wrote about ARMY cannot Change the thinking of atleast 85% of our population. People still love Army and Trust Army. Whatever the media or press says about Army is not going to change people's thinking.... No by far!



You r absolutely rite,people of pakistan still Pak Army ,respect n encourage them.n dont know about their image made by Media. n in my opinon media should support them ....!!!


:pakistan:
 
Back
Top Bottom