Why are you even on internet, it is so dangerous..
Or the Afghans beating USSR and then USA
I don't think the Germans were technologically inferior, if anything their weapons tended to be better. Take Tiger tanks, Me-103 jets, King Tiger, Panther etc. However the Germans excelled in -
Afghans won by bloody guerilla warfare. Most Pakistani's don't have it in them to fight like that. It entails giving the enemy the country and then slicing them with death of 1,000 cuts over years. But on the negative side is losing millions of your people and being bombed to stone age.
Absolutely sir
Germany lost because it was ruled by mindless Nazi fascists who were too arrogant and overestimated their power and opened multiple fronts. Russian front proved more than the last nail in their coffin.. That is the glaring example of their shear stupidity and arrogance.... and Modi's India is no where even closer to the level of sophistication Nazi Germany had. It was not dependent on anyone rather most of the modern mil technology finds it roots in the Nazi Germany...from jet fighters to submarines, to missiles etc ...while Gangadesh can't even design a teja bhai in 4 decades and that too despite active support from the top industry leaders... so keep your analysis to yourself.
Nope. During the invasion of France, most of the tanks they fielded were nothing more than lightly armored vehicles with small guns (The Tigers came later). The French and British forces outnumbered them and were also qualitatively superior.
Their Generals were afraid of an attack in the flank, the Allies were so stunned by the speed of the attack that only a half hearted push was made, and that too was brushed aside by the Germans. A determined attack by the British would have halted their advance, split their forces and they would have lost.
