What's new

A Muslim Mosque can be demolished, but not a Hindu temple: Modi's close aide Subramanian Swamy

Partial justice.

The fact is both 1992 and 2002 riots were started by the Muslims killing Hindus as a reaction to the destruction of Babri Masjid.

So I would like to ask you, do you justify and approve Muslims killing Hindus for the destruction of a Mosque which itself was constructed on top of a Temple that was destructed by a Muslim tyrant ruler?
 
Canada is the closest thing to it
May be. But in countries like India or Pakistan it's difficult unless people keep their religion as personal thing but that is impossible.
In India on one hand muslims want special treatment as per their faith and on the other hand they want Hindus to not follow their faith. Isn't it hypocrisy? How can this be called protecting minority rights?
 
May be. But in countries like India or Pakistan it's difficult unless people keep their religion as personal thing but that is impossible.
In India on one hand muslims want special treatment as per their faith and on the other hand they want Hindus to not follow their faith. Isn't it hypocrisy? How can this be called protecting minority rights?


This Phenomenon is not unique to India.
every country they go to, they demand special privileges and laws to accommodate them, all the while spewing insults after insults to the local religion & culture.

Little wonder they have become scary for people all over the world.
 
This Phenomenon is not unique to India.
every country they go to, they demand special privileges and laws to accommodate them, all the while spewing insults after insults to the local religion & culture.

Little wonder they have become scary for people all over the world.
This is their modus operandi. Claim special treatment under name of their faith and don't let majority to follow their faith in the name of minority rights protection.
 
Why are Pakistanis worked up...Mandir or Masid, it is India's internal matter. Let Indian Hindus and Muslims resolve that. Whatever Pakistanis think will not will not make iota of difference to Mandir or Masid issue here in India.
 
T
The fact is both 1992 and 2002 riots were started by the Muslims killing Hindus as a reaction to the destruction of Babri Masjid.

So I would like to ask you, do you justify and approve Muslims killing Hindus for the destruction of a Mosque which itself was constructed on top of a Temple that was destructed by a Muslim tyrant ruler?
ose who were involved in bombings are hanged . while those who are responsible for the destruction of babri masjid & riots are still free .
 
T

ose who were involved in bombings are hanged . while those who are responsible for the destruction of babri masjid & riots are still free .

You have not answered my question - Does destruction of a structure (with no loss of life) justify starting riots and indulging in terrorist activities?
 
In a real democracy "rights of a minority are protected"

That's why Hindus are asking everyone's approval rather than passing a blanket law against minorities.

Had they been like organised religions, none of the minorities would have existed after 1947.

meanwhile in Islamic state of Pakistan
View attachment 386915

View attachment 386916

By that logic, Delhi's Jama Masjid and Hyderabad's Mecca Masjid are also maintained by the government.

Not to mention the Gyanwapi mosque which was built atop the original temple's ruins still stands.

If that is not tolerance by the Hindus, I don't know what is.
 
Swamy also appreciated Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath's move to visit Ayodhya


Putting forward his arguments in favour of building Ram Temple in Ayodhya, Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) leader Subramanian Swamy on Sunday said a mosque can be demolished but a temple cannot because the God resides there.

Swamy said that its people's misconception to believe a mosque and temple to be equal institutions. According to him, a mosque is only a convenient place for the Muslims to offer prayers.

"Namaaz can be read without it also. But as far as temple is concerned, we have faith that god enters the idol placed there and becomes its owner. Different people claim their ownership over mosques, but only God Ram is the owner of the temple. So, Mosque can be removed demolished, but a temple cannot be even touched after the placing of the idol," Swamy told the media.

1481824234-8351.jpg

Subramanian Swamy
Expressing confidence over getting the Supreme Court's verdict in his favour, the BJP leader said the logic given by him has not been put forward by anyone else.
"We will wait for the court's decision. We will win the case. The logic which I have given has not been given by anyone," he added.

Swamy also appreciated Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath's move to visit Ayodhya.

"I bow to Adityanath for visiting Ayodhya. He does what he says and says what he does. It is very good that such an honest person is now Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister," he said.

Asserting that the Muslim front in the Ram Mandir case will have to choose a different spot to build a mosque, Swamy earlier on Wednesday said if a compromise is not reached on this matter then the saffron party will pass a legislation in this regard when they will have a majority in the Rajya Sabha.

Swamy lauded Chief Justice of India J.S. Khehar's 'noble gesture' to mediate during the out of court settlement if both parties want.

http://www.business-standard.com/ar...-temple-subramanian-swamy-117032600664_1.html


Those who talk of minority rights and suckularism in Muslim states, fvck it in their rat hole. It's truly a disgusting practice.


Khalistanis & Kashmiris ( as you count them indian ) both ask for Our help .

But the Pakistani establishment disappoints them again and again. May I ask why?


A Hindu shot him because he asked Hindus to keep quiet and die in millions..

Gandhi had asked Hindus to die in millions, is this how RSS terrorists blatantly twist the truth in india?
 
That's why Hindus are asking everyone's approval rather than passing a blanket law against minorities.

Had they been like organised religions, none of the minorities would have existed after 1947.



By that logic, Delhi's Jama Masjid and Hyderabad's Mecca Masjid are also maintained by the government.

Not to mention the Gyanwapi mosque which was built atop the original temple's ruins still stands.

If that is not tolerance by the Hindus, I don't know what is.
Not to memention Krishna janmbhoomi where there is mosque
Mathura.jpg

Gyanwapi Mosque
93e4d7a659111f1ccdcb0fcdb414182e.jpg

egy221.jpg
 
Hindu and Muslim leaders should sit together and resolve this issue amicably.

First the list of mosques constructed by destroying the temples need to be finalized and then move those mosques to alternate locations in agreement with the Muslim leaders and rebuild the temples in the original location where they were built.
 
This is their modus operandi. Claim special treatment under name of their faith and don't let majority to follow their faith in the name of minority rights protection.

You can worship any idol you want, and love any cow you want but forcing your hindutva beleifs upon muslims is intolerable, why should muslims not be able to eat as per faith because you worship our food

Why are Pakistanis worked up...Mandir or Masid, it is India's internal matter. Let Indian Hindus and Muslims resolve that. Whatever Pakistanis think will not will not make iota of difference to Mandir or Masid issue here in India.

It proves Jinnah was right!!!!

Whats happening in India is why we had Partition and why we made Pakistan.

It also puts indian muslims in their place, their used to be a time when they used to mumble about a secular republic, now we throw it in their face.
Not to be mean mind you, just to wake them up so they see hindus through the same eyes as us and act to safe guard their communities
 

Latest posts

Pakistan Defence Latest Posts

Pakistan Affairs Latest Posts

Back
Top Bottom