A Muslim Mosque can be demolished, but not a Hindu temple: Modi's close aide Subramanian Swamy

[NakedLunch]

It proves Jinnah was right!!!!

Yogi has already agreed last week that the Two Nation Theory was correct. He said Islam and Hinduims cannot coexist. It has taken them almost 80 years to accept that fact. At least now we dont have to justify it anymore. They are doing it themselves.

 

[hussain0216]

You have not answered my question - Does destruction of a structure (with no loss of life) justify starting riots and indulging in terrorist activities?

The destruction of the structure if not opposed would lead to s threat to every muslim mosque in India. It is and was vital muslim community regardless of cost fought back against a state adamant in harming them

 

[AKD]

You can worship any idol you want, and love any cow you want but forcing your hindutva beleifs upon muslims is intolerable, why should muslims not be able to eat as per faith because you worship our food



It proves Jinnah was right!!!!

Whats happening in India is why we had Partition and why we made Pakistan.

It also puts indian muslims in their place, their used to be a time when they used to mumble about a secular republic, now we throw it in their face.
Not to be mean mind you, just to wake them up so they see hindus through the same eyes as us and act to safe guard their communities

They can readily eat beef on those states where it is legal

You have to follow state rules.

 

[hussain0216]

Hindu and Muslim leaders should sit together and resolve this issue amicably.

First the list of mosques constructed by destroying the temples need to be finalized and then move those mosques to alternate locations in agreement with the Muslim leaders and rebuild the temples in the original location where they were built.

There was no temple

There was no Rama, unless you can produce his birth certificate

It was the destruction of a place of worship for the muslim community

Their own state colluded with hindu fundamentalists


The indian muslim community must NEVER allow the building of this temple, as it will never be enough and they will then move on to attack the next mosque. Your stand is here

You failed to heed Jinnah when he told you about these hindus, Pakistan has 150+ nuclear warheads to protect us, you have nothing but you need to stsnd up for your community

They can readily eat beef on those states where it is legal
View attachment 387447
You have to follow state rules.

Those state rules are hindutva rules, why should alleged secular state/republic force a religious communities laws upon other religious groups?

Unless you are a hindu banana republic

 

[AKD]

There was no temple

There was no Rama, unless you can produce his birth certificate

It was the destruction of a place of worship for the muslim community

Then there is no Muhammad..
Madina and Mecca should be brought down.. Can you bring birth certificate of Muhammad?
Ancient hindu scripts have said that is shree rams birthplace.. And ASI have also proved there was a temple which was brought down to construct a temple by a brutal Islamic genocidal terrorist.
Read the report
http://m.indiatoday.in/story/asi-fi...ct-of-reviving-ayodhya-campaign/1/206087.html

https://gold.mukto-mona.com/Articles/ajoy/asi_report_babri.html

Their own state colluded with hindu fundamentalists


The indian muslim community must NEVER allow the building of this temple, as it will never be enough and they will then move on to attack the next mosque. Your stand is here

You failed to heed Jinnah when he told you about these hindus, Pakistan has 150+ nuclear warheads to protect us, you have nothing but you need to stsnd up for your community



Those state rules are hindutva rules, why should alleged secular state/republic force a religious communities laws upon other religious groups?

Unless you are a hindu banana republic

Temple will be made and no muslim can do anything..

 

[hussain0216]

Then there is no Muhammad..
Madina and Mecca should be brought down.. Can you bring birth certificate of Muhammad?
Ancient hindu scripts have said that is shree rams birthplace.. And ASI have also proved there was a temple which was brought down to construct a temple by a brutal Islamic genocidal terrorist.
Read the report
http://m.indiatoday.in/story/asi-fi...ct-of-reviving-ayodhya-campaign/1/206087.html

https://gold.mukto-mona.com/Articles/ajoy/asi_report_babri.html

Temple will be made and no muslim can do anything..

There were no birth certificates in Arabia during those times.
.Muhammed pbuh is also a historical figure

You are saying your giant blue Rama was born in an exact location but you have no proof, your clown hindutva articles apart


Your right the Muslim community will be stuck depending on how much of a hindu banana republic India has become, its up to them to stand up for their community and understand India is a enemy for them as are the hindus and they need to prepare for another Partition

 

[AKD]

You are saying your giant blue Rama was born in an exact location but you have no proof, your clown hindutva articles apart

There was a temple at the same spot since 4th century was was destroyed by terrorist genoicider babur just like krishna janmbhoomi(coincidentally there is a mosque there too)
The Proof of temple was found by ASI(archeological survey of India)who had a Muslim head at that time(2003)
It is still better than your rants.

 

[hussain0216]

There was a temple at the same spot since 4th century was was destroyed by terrorist genoicider babur just like krishna janmbhoomi(coincidentally there is a mosque there too)
The Proof of temple was found by ASI(archeological survey of India)who had a Muslim head at that time(2003)
It is still better than your rants.

No they didn't, all you have is some hindutva allegations, backed up by hindutva "archeology surveys" with your SC mo les making a judgement on a giant blue God

 

[AKD]

No they didn't, all you have is some hindutva allegations, backed up by hindutva "archeology surveys" with your SC mo les making a judgement on a giant blue God

Wow if you label national archeology institution as hindutva.then i have nothing to say.
But one thing is clear mandir will be made sooner or later otherwise you will see millions of karsevaks this time

Building material is already there since a decade..one push and mandir will be made
http://m.timesofindia.com/city/luck...ready-in-Ayodhya/amp_articleshow/37501940.cms

 

[hussain0216]

Wow if you label national archeology institution as hindutva.then i have nothing to say.
But one thing is clear mandir will be made sooner or later otherwise you will see millions of karsevaks this time

Building material is already there since a decade..one push and mandir will be made
http://m.timesofindia.com/city/luck...ready-in-Ayodhya/amp_articleshow/37501940.cms

You mighy aswell got the survey done by the Bangalore clown college

Like I said its up to the Indian muslim community to stand up for themselves, they should be able to put their trust in a secular democracy and security forces

But the reality is india has had a quick slide towarda becoming a hindu banana republic


Its all up to indian muslims to safe guard their future

 

[AKD]

You mighy aswell got the survey by the Bangalore clown college

Like I said its up to the Indian muslim community to stand up for themselves, they should be able to put their trust in a secular democracy and security forces

But the reality is india has had a quick slide towarda becoming a hindu banana republic


Its all up to indian muslims to safe guard their future

The dispute started in 1853 and first account of temple was written in 1778 by British. So you are saying british were also hindutvas...
As i said temple will be made sooner or later..
Then next turm will be of mosques at krishna janmbhoomi(Shahi-Eidgah Mosque) and at the original site of Kashi Vishwanath(Gyanwapi Mosque).they will be destroyed to make way for original temples

 

[JOEY TRIBIANI]

You have not answered my question - Does destruction of a structure (with no loss of life) justify starting riots and indulging in terrorist activities?

Are Muslims in india allowed to destruct somnath mandir ( without harming any hindu physically) ?

.



But the Pakistani establishment disappoints them again and again. May I ask why?

We are very much active in india ( as per indian claims ) . we even derailed trains there .we are constructing CPEC and keep india busy in curfews & etc .

 

[hussain0216]

The dispute started in 1853 and first account of temple was written in 1778 by British. So you are saying british were also hindutvas...
As i said temple will be made sooner or later..
Then next turm will be of mosques at krishna janmbhoomi(Shahi-Eidgah Mosque) and at the original site of Kashi Vishwanath(Gyanwapi Mosque).they will be destroyed to make way for original temples

Sure British account and what happened did the British witness Rama being born?


If hindu's wernt do dick less they would have taken on Babur or Akbar or Tamerlane then rather than be bitch slapped and talk big now with a unarmed indian muslim population

Once again it falls to the indian muslim population to stand up and defend themselves Pakistan can only support them through the ISI

 

[Tshering22]

babri Mosque


babri Mosque

Well I don't think demolishing their temples in the first go was very tolerant of you guys either.

And neither did we appreciate the destruction of Nalanda.

So yes, historically you started this love and peace.

 

[Mugwop]

That's why Hindus are asking everyone's approval rather than passing a blanket law against minorities.

Had they been like organised religions, none of the minorities would have existed after 1947.



By that logic, Delhi's Jama Masjid and Hyderabad's Mecca Masjid are also maintained by the government.

Not to mention the Gyanwapi mosque which was built atop the original temple's ruins still stands.

If that is not tolerance by the Hindus, I don't know what is.

A Muslim Mosqe can be demolished but not a hindu temple sounds more like a threat not approval.
Minorities have been existing in theocracies before 1947.

They are protected that is why 19% minority are challenging so called 80% majority for their most religious place.

Videos show how well they were protected.

May be. But in countries like India or Pakistan it's difficult unless people keep their religion as personal thing but that is impossible.
In India on one hand muslims want special treatment as per their faith and on the other hand they want Hindus to not follow their faith. Isn't it hypocrisy? How can this be called protecting minority rights?

That is absolutely correct.

The minority you are talking about is bigger that the population of most of the countries in the world,you must be joking if you think they need protection or cant takecare of themselfs.

Who will protect them from swamy? Regarding population rss has called for their sterilization.