A conflict with Iran would not be like the Iraq War. It would be worse

[LeGenD]

PAC-3 can't track targets with more than 6 mach speed and altitude of 20 km, khorramshahr rises to more than 60 km and re enters with speed of mach 10.
why you thing US stationed THAAD in israel after we tested khorramshahr??

AN/MPQ-65 (PAC-3) Under the PAC-3 program the MPQ-53 radar set has been replaced with the MPQ-65. The MPQ-65 is a passive radar meaning it does not emit any signals, but instead collects signals edited from aircraft. This allows the radar to remain undetected as it tracks targets. [v] The upgraded MPQ-65 radar can track up to 100 targets at once. The baseline features are enhanced to better counter developing threats like maneuverable ballistic missiles, stealth cruise missile, and aircraft.[vi] Using a C-band frequency, the radar carries a range of over 100km and is also operated by using the MSP-104 ESC.[vii] The AN/MPQ-65 radar uses a second traveling wave tube (TWT) which allocates more search, detection, and tracking, capabilities than the MPQ-53.[viii] - MDAA

PAC-3 and PAC-3 MSE can defeat an advanced ballistic missile in the terminal phase of its flight, provided the ballistic missile breach the target engagement envelope of either (~35 KM ceiling). Effectiveness of the system is in how it is employed; to shield high value targets and/or facilities. These systems have defeated targets representative of MRBM class speed and range during operationally realistic trials, therefore MACH 6 cap is not true.

THAAD can shield entire cities from ballistic missiles, and can defeat any ballistic missile type because its target acquisition envelope is massive and interceptors are hypersonic.

 

[Mithridates]

PAC-3 and PAC-3 MSE can defeat an advanced ballistic missile in the terminal phase of its flight, provided the ballistic missile breach the target engagement envelope of either (~35 KM ceiling). Effectiveness of the system is in how it is employed; to shield high value targets and/or facilities. These systems have defeated targets representative of MRBM class speed and range during operationally realistic trials, therefore MACH 6 cap is not true.

http://www.designation-systems.net/dusrm/app4/pac-3.html
isn't it cute that you guys are making a giant of US while they themselves admit that they are not. the link states PAC-3 range and flight ceilings for ABM defence is 20 and 15 km respectively. the source for data: lockheed martin.
seems like the US and her southie fellows are more vulnerable than what i thought.

 

[500]

we did not had weapons

You had 80 F-14 which were most powerful fighters of that time (like F-22 today).

Now your air force is total junk. All you have is North Korean modifications of ancient Scud rockets.

 

[WinterNights]

Now your air force is total junk. All you have is North Korean modifications of ancient Scud rockets.

Why are you blabbering ? Iran barely uses anything based on the scuds these days, most of it's missile are based on its own solid fuel family. Even your own missile experts e.g Uzi Rubin confirmed what I am saying. It seems your behind is burning too much.

Iran does not need a top notch airforce, even tiny hezbollah r@ped your apartheid state without having any airforce.

 

[Mithridates]

You had 80 F-14 which were most powerful fighters of that time (like F-22 today).

Now your air force is total junk. All you have is North Korean modifications of ancient Scud rockets.

please bring some of your f-15s to prove our AF is nothing. funny part about our missile force is in the past NK gave us the tech now we are giving them fateh class missiles and we provide them tech to make ICBM to reach US. BTW why you guys are so afraid if our inventory is just ancient scuds??

Why are you blabbering you retarded ape? Iran barely uses anything based on the scuds these days, most of it's missile are based on its own solid fuel family.

Iran does not need a top notch airforce, even tiny hezbollah r@ped your apartheid state without having any airforce.



This legend is a clown, he has inferiority complex and licks the behind of anything the white men does/says. These people have subhuman mentality.

most of people fear the name of US, while US presence is incignificant in region. that legend dude is also a US tech fanboy like the other guy undertaker was russian tech fanboy.

 

[LeGenD]

This legend is a clown, he has inferiority complex and licks the behind of anything the white men does/says. These people have subhuman mentality.

I discuss technicalities and geopolitics from neutral standpoint, you moron. I have my fair share of criticism of US in my posts but this doesn't imply that I condone controversial acts of Iran - I will call a spade a spade. Trolling is your best forte, low IQ scum.

 

[LeGenD]

http://www.designation-systems.net/dusrm/app4/pac-3.html
isn't it cute that you guys are making a giant of US while they themselves admit that they are not. the link states PAC-3 range and flight ceilings for ABM defence is 20 and 15 km respectively. the source for data: lockheed martin.
seems like the US and her southie fellows are more vulnerable than what i thought.

These matters are murky.

PAC-3 original have a ceiling of 20 KM and PAC-3 MSE have a ceiling of 35 KM. Now ceiling is different from actual range. All I know is that PAC-3 and/or PAC-3 MSE have defeated MRBM class targets in some tests which are not openly advertised, so this indicate that the true extent of the engagement envelope of either configuration is classified.

You're a clueless fanboy that has inferiority complex, you'd even worship the faeces of the Americans if they asked you. Furthermore, your "discussions" have as much technicals value as a monkey trying to discuss quantum physics.

Don't bother quoting me; I am not interested in having any argument with the likes of you. However, if you continue to troll, you will be reported and taken care of.

 

[500]

Why are you blabbering you retarded ape? Iran barely uses anything based on the scuds these days, most of it's missile are based on its own solid fuel family. Even your own missile experts e.g Uzi Rubin confirmed what I am saying. It seems your behind is burning too much.

Iran does not need a top notch airforce, even tiny hezbollah r@ped your apartheid state without having any airforce.



This legend is a clown, he has inferiority complex and licks the behind of anything the white men does/says. These people have subhuman mentality.

ALl ur space program is based on North Korean rockets. Anywayz u 40 years ago u had one of the strongest air forces in the world, today one of the weakest. And air force is a key to victory.

 

[LeGenD]

Clown,

You're the one quoting me, not the other way around. Now go running to the mods like the little girl you are.

You started trolling me for no apparent reason in this thread. Did you bother to seek any clarification from me? My observations are up to the mark, you numskull. Shut your beak and get lost.

 

[WinterNights]

ALl ur space program is based on North Korean rockets. .

More BS kid, once again, go listen to your own UZI Rubin who has said it was Iran giving the korean the ability to successfully launch their satellites.

And air force is a key to victory

And yet you got r@ped by hezbollah, a tiny group with no airforce of it's own.

 

[LeGenD]

@Eagle
@Dubious
@Oscar

Please check the posts of this member WinterNights; he is trolling and attacking me and other members for no apparent reason. Completely unwarranted.

 

[Mithridates]

ALl ur space program is based on North Korean rockets. Anywayz u 40 years ago u had one of the strongest air forces in the world, today one of the weakest. And air force is a key to victory.

no 40 years ago we had the best US maded planes now we have the best missiles and drones in region.

These matters are murky.

PAC-3 original have a ceiling of 20 KM and PAC-3 MSE have a ceiling of 35 KM. Now ceiling is different from actual range. All I know is that PAC-3 and/or PAC-3 MSE have defeated MRBM class targets in some tests which are not openly advertised, so this indicate that the true extent of the engagement envelope of either configuration is classified.


Don't bother quoting me; I am not interested in having any argument with the likes of you. However, if you continue to troll, you will be reported and taken care of.

still they can't hit khorramshahr in terminal phase.

 

[LeGenD]

still they can't hit khorramshahr in terminal phase.

And how would you know?

 

[Mithridates]

And how would you know?

khorramshahr rises to 60 km and dives over the target so PAC-3 MSE can't even reach it (based on your info it's flight ceiling is 35 km).

 

[LeGenD]

khorramshahr rises to 60 km and dives over the target so PAC-3 MSE can't even reach it (based on your info it's flight ceiling is 35 km).

I do not understand. The warhead is supposed to engage a particular target, right? For this to happen, it has to come down and connect, or explode a few meters above. However, if this particular target is under protection of PAC-3 or PAC-3 MSE, then there is no way that Khorramshahr MRBM can get through. Climbing 60 KM into the air is missing the point when the objective is to score a kill.

If you are implying Midcourse intercept than of-course, PAC-3 and PAC-3 MSE are not designed to achieve this; these are point-defense systems.