A Bitter Question About So Called Indian Economic Development & Naxalite–Maoist Movement.

[PakEye]

15 security men killed in Naxal ambush in Chhattisgarh
India not addressing their demands the Great Maoist Movement defending & fighting for their Land rights of peoples Land, for neglected agricultural labourers and the poorest
When the world so called emerging economic power Shared the benefits of this progress to the to these Poor peoples.

 

[IndoUS]

Please look into what they do, when development is brought into these areas. They blow up schools, roads and hospitals. They kill teacher and doctors and any government personnel that work in the red corridor area, simply because these doctors and teachers are government workers. If they keep killing innocent worker, why would and sane person would want to work or open their business in the area that has these lunatics going around killing people. The Maoist are now a splintered group, they no longer stand by their original goal for saving the poor. Just look at the news of these people killing and tribals or their own cadre that decide to move away from their demented ideals.

 

[Kloitra]

15 security men killed in Naxal ambush in Chhattisgarh
India not addressing their demands the Great Maoist Movement defending & fighting for their Land rights of peoples Land, for neglected agricultural labourers and the poorest
When the world so called emerging economic power Shared the benefits of this progress to the to these Poor peoples.

The benefits would be shared when these poor would decide to stop killing and start accepting the development.

The regions where naxal activities have reduced, the growth picked up. Chattisghar has been one of the fast developing states, with more than national average growth. Had the naxals allowed to, the growth would have been much faster.

 

[PakEye]

Please look into what they do,

plese reply Why they do ???
Resion ???

 

[Kloitra]

plese reply Why they do ???
Resion ???

Due to a movement. Based on communist ideology - Maoism to be precise. Rejected in mainstream India. As a democracy, it is inherently wrong to try imposing your own ideology onto others. If majority had wanted, they could have elected communist all over the place. Just because a small group wants it, country cannot give in to their demands.

 

[PakEye]

The benefits would be shared when these poor would decide to stop killing and start accepting the development.

The regions where naxal activities have reduced, the growth picked up. Chattisghar has been one of the fast developing states, with more than national average growth. Had the naxals allowed to, the growth would have been much faster.

Reduced ???
inplace of addresed their demands !!!

 

[Kloitra]

Reduced ???
inplace of addresed their demands !!!

Yeah, reduced. India has rejected the Maoist ideology. Can't let an armed group impose it one majority.

 

[PakEye]

Yeah, reduced. India has rejected the Maoist ideology. Can't let an armed group impose it one majority.

What is the spirit of democracy rejection or respect of differences ?

 

[Scythian Salahuddin]

India has 85% of its population starving n yet sends Chandrayan to the moon, its a country of multiple nationalities in multiple castes, colors and religions, it is so confusing that only the brilliant Kashmiris can give you the correct answer despite imprisonment by great democracy called India ;-)

 

[polkhol]

Post reported for derailing thread

India has 85% of its population starving n yet sends Chandrayan to the moon, its a country of multiple nationalities in multiple castes, colors and religions, it is so confusing that only the brilliant Kashmiris can give you the correct answer despite imprisonment by great democracy called India ;-)

 

[IndoUS]

What is the spirit of democracy rejection or respect of differences ?

When someone starts to kill indiscriminately, it is the job of the government to take care of such groups. If they wanted their voices to be heard they could have taken it with the media, but rather they decided to pick up arms. If you kill innocents then don't expect any sympathy from anyone. Being a democracy doesn't mean following every single whim.

 

[Kloitra]

What is the spirit of democracy rejection or respect of differences ?

You are mistaking something. Democracy can't exist with parallel ideologies. If communism has to exist, it has to exist inside democracy, and not in parallel. India has communist parties, longest running CM was a communist. But communism cannot be allowed to replace democracy.

What Naxal want is Marxism and not democracy. As much as we respect their wishes, we cannot allow them to impose it on others.

 

[polkhol]

Oh really? Then why don't Pakistan allow their terrorists to blow and bomb Pakistan as a signature of freedom and respecting the difference. Asking to provide freedom to naxals is just like asking for freedom to terrorists to do what they want.

What is the spirit of democracy rejection or respect of differences ?

 

[Scythian Salahuddin]

Indian Democracy is the enemy, it is an exercise in materialism as devised by atheist n polytheist Greco-Romans, India is aping the Roman empire in letter and spirit, the Maoists are kinda lucky because they aren't Muslim Kashmiris and that's why Indian politicians don't openly declare them as terrorists or traitors despite this being their single biggest internal security threat after malnutrition.

 

[PakEye]

Due to a movement. Based on communist ideology - Maoism to be precise. Rejected in mainstream India. As a democracy, it is inherently wrong to try imposing your own ideology onto others. If majority had wanted, they could have elected communist all over the place. Just because a small group wants it, country cannot give in to their demands.

it means the minority rights are zero in your defination of democracy .