And not a single post of mine talks about the theory you picked up nor about the Dr. you picked up.....
I do not care. Dr. Judy Wood who proposed the orbital ray gun version of 9/11 is in
YOUR camp.
But that is precisely the point. The reason I call you 'loony' is because of the diversity of theories for 9/11 ranging from Jews to orbital ray gun that dissolved the top portions of the WTC Towers. You guys have no consistency.
Not only the lack of consistency, there is ignorance as well as I proved about the word 'pull' in post 165. You cannot escape it. The word 'pull' as interpreted by your side to mean detonate the explosives is essential to the core of your belief. Your side claimed Silverstein ordered WTC 7 destroyed by his use of the word 'pull'. The demolition industry proved you wrong. It does not matter if
YOU brought it into this discussion or not. That error belongs to your side and since you believe in these loony theories,
YOU own it.
Another example of ignorance is the argument that since none of the hijackers were certified, as in licensed, to fly airliners, there is no way they could have performed the maneuvers necessary to crash into the towers. That means those aircrafts were under remote controls.
That argument was supposedly brought up by a pilot and presumably belongs to the pilots for 9/11 truth group.
Any licensed pilot know that argument is absolute nonsense. I learned to fly when I was 17-18 yrs old. In the USAF, I was on two aircrafts: F-111 and F-16. If anyone made that stupid argument, either he is not a real pilot or an utter incompetent boob of a pilot.
Any licensed pilot know that a certification have little to do with flying skills. On certification day, you can show up blind drunk and failed your cert, but that would have no effects on the flying skills that you learned and practiced over the past several months. A certification is a testament by an organization whose credibility is accepted by the government to say that you have learned enough flying skills to make a living as a pilot. In WW II, Japanese kamikaze pilots trained only to take off but not land. So if the hijackers have no intention of making a living as pilots, what need is there for certifications and licensing ?
Airliners are actually easier to fly, due to more automation, than jet fighters. Did you know that ? Of course you did not know that. So why is it so tough to become an airline pilot ? Yes, there are many differences between flying humans vs flying bombs and missiles, but precisely because you are ferrying humans from point A to point B, there are issues directly related to humans that do not exists with bombs and missiles and you must be trained and certified to those skills. But the core of flight is the same for airliners and jet fighters. If the hijackers can learn to take off and maintain level flight, that is all the skills they need to fly an airliner and to crash them, like the WW II Japanese kamikaze pilots, into buildings.
People in specific professions, be they scientists or engineers or pilots, successfully poked holes in your arguments based on what they know best. They do not need to publish what they found. They just need to ignore your kind and they have.
.
