What's new

7 Questions to Pakistani Members : Article 370

But see the Irony, Since 1947 while Hindus did get finished in Pakistan.. Surprisingly their counterparts.... Muslim Population is Growing FASTEST in India.

- Our Current Ambassador to UN is a Muslim
- Our Previous Intelligence Chief was a Mulsim
- Our Previous President was a Muslim
- We have many Billionaires like Azim Premji who happen to be Muslims..

So what are you you talking about ? Pakistan has far far more secterian divide than the hindu-muslim issue in India.

Before you talk about Mulsims in India, do you know the status if Hindus in Pakistan ?

Also, in the year 2000( just after kargil ) Pakistan had won and India was humiliated. Guess what 10 Years Later... an ISI General says it was EXACT opposite.

Ms. Lodhi after UNSC.. 2 days back.. comes out and says.. we have won.. India is humiliated... Guess what.. Russian Ambassador comes out and Clears the Air...

Please come out of you la-la land.. and face the Truth.


The Indian Muslim population is growing inspite of India much to Hindu annoyance

Your fooling yourself, Indian social media is full of hate towards Indian Muslims which is now seeping into the Indian national conscience in a number of anti Muslim actions
Pakistan will seek to support Indian Muslims against their Hindu enemies as time goes on


Fcuk the Hindus in Pakistan. Let them go to India

Pakistan still holds s number of peaks captured from India in our Kargil excursion, Indian army ran from the battlefield as Pakistan pushed forward.

It was only massive international pressure that allowed India to mop up the remnants of our excursion giving Pakistan control of a number of peaks ,(look it up)


Pakistan simply supports the people of Kashmir and will advocate for them across the globe
India is using facist tactics and we will support the people of Kashmir in their resistance
 
.
Do you know what is 'trolling' kiddo ? you have just heard and used the word?

A Pakistan said, India should get out of IOK , but as per UN resolutions Pakistan too should get out of AJK.
If you have guts.. tell me.. where is the troll ?
You have no right to talk sh*t about Kashmir and hide behind "education purpose question". You pose question which follows your agenda but ignored when I brought up Junagadh earlier. The following is the favorite leisure activity of your ppl and I have no time to entertain your nonsense

 
.
You have no right to talk sh*t about Kashmir and hide behind "education purpose question". You pose question which follows your agenda but ignored when I brought up Junagadh earlier. The following is the favorite leisure activity of your ppl and I have no time to entertain your nonsense


Now Thats Classic Troll. Please stick to Topic.
 
.
I will be honest to admit :

1. yes, if you ask Kashmirs.. only Muslims yes they dont want India.
2. But they dont want Pakistan as well. They want Freedom from BOTH India and Pakistan.
3. You missed that There are Kashmiri Pandits who do want India and they are NATIVEs of Kashmir
4. You Entirely Forget WHY> There was no such urnet BEFORE 1988. The Urnest and rebellion was started and fueled ARTIFICIALLY by Pakistan so, its like India telling you that since there are Issues in Baluchistan, you must Free Baluchistan.

@waz @Dubious @The Eagle @Irfan Baloch

You guys wanna ban this gangu ... Make sure its a perma ban

I don't know why we are tolerating gangus who spread propaganda and lies.
 
.
But they dont want Pakistan as well. They want Freedom from BOTH India and Pakistan.

No they don't the vast majority are loyal Pakistanis

They hate India's Hindus, this is a religious issue for us
 
. .
GB was never an issue, it was raised during the rule of Asif Ali MOFO Zardari.
We know it was Indian cold start and they tried to divide Pakistan in provinces but they failed there as well.

Now my question to OP, why Indian had to lie to it's own people about infiltration, you were going change Kashmir into prison but you lied that you are doing it because some terrorists are crossing the border from Pakistan. whereas, Kashmir violence is the reaction of Indian occupation.
 
.
No they don't the vast majority are loyal Pakistanis

They hate India's Hindus, this is a religious issue for us

I think this was WELL TESTED in 1965. No ?
And it proved to be a shock.


Operation Gibraltar was based on the assumption that guerrilla attacks would trigger an uprising by the Muslim majority population of Indian-controlled Kashmir, most of whom had wanted to join Pakistan at the time of the partition of British India in 1947.

Result :

But the civilians of Indian-administered Kashmir were not only not prepared for mass rebellion, they actually suffered at the hands of the intruders. Military historians cite numerous examples where civilians were killed or harmed, and others where they turned the infiltrators in.
 
.
GB was never an issue, it was raised during the rule of Asif Ali MOFO Zardari.
We know it was Indian cold start and they tried to divide Pakistan in provinces but they failed there as well.

Now my question to OP, why Indian had to lie to it's own people about infiltration, you were going change Kashmir into prison but you lied that you are doing it because some terrorists are crossing the border from Pakistan. whereas, Kashmir violence is the reaction of Indian occupation.

Don't engage with the troll and propagandist. Report him to mods so we can ban his pathetic ugly ***.
 
.
GB was never an issue, it was raised during the rule of Asif Ali MOFO Zardari.
We know it was Indian cold start and they tried to divide Pakistan in provinces but they failed there as well.

Now my question to OP, why Indian had to lie to it's own people about infiltration, you were going change Kashmir into prison but you lied that you are doing it because some terrorists are crossing the border from Pakistan. whereas, Kashmir violence is the reaction of Indian occupation.

Can you please clarify on.. "infiltration part"?
I'd love to answer @BATMAN

Don't engage with the troll and propagandist. Report him to mods so we can ban his pathetic ugly ***.

Why do i need to repet it again and again. Bhai.. You need to tag a mod for ban. Like this :

@waz this gentleman too wants me banned. Please Advise.
 
.
The Link I posted shows that Pakistan wants to Annex GB > There is fierce Opposition to it. Period.
My Point is, You have your own piece of kashmir which has the SAME issues like India. What makes you qualified to attach a "muslim majority" state to your landmass, when an existing part is facing urnest?

If GB was very happy to be a part of pakistan, I would have been quick to admit that yes, Pakistan has done it well. but, when GB itself doesn't want to be a part of Pakistan why should/would Kashmir be a part of it ? Whats the point ?



Thanx for the reply bro. FYI, 99% of India Backs BJP Gov. for Kashmir Move, I think based on your own point, Is int enough to call it a valid move ?


The same applies for AJK.. No ?



Thats your Opinion. Not Reality. A similar 'Opinion' was made in 1947.
The differnce in 2019 is -17 Billion and +430 Billion USD.

By 95%, I meant AJK and GB population. Reason for (some; not fierce at all) opposition is because integration means annexation which means it isn't a part of disputed territory anymore and so you lose your argument in international forum to be calling Kashmir disputed territory.
 
. .
By 95%, I meant AJK and GB population. Reason for (some; not fierce at all) opposition is because integration means annexation which means it isn't a part of disputed territory anymore and so you lose your argument in international forum to be calling Kashmir disputed territory.

Thanx for th reply. Much appreciated.
Actually i mean is the Legal or lets say... the outcome part :

“Constitutionally and legally, the territory of Gilgit-Baltistan is part of the state of Jammu and Kashmir and any attempt to secede it from the disputed region will deal a blow to the stand of Pakistan and Kashmiris regarding the longstanding dispute,” said Sardar Abid Hussain Abid, AJK Minister for Information, while talking to Dawn.

“But the federal government should avoid annexing the territory as a province, lest India may use it a justification to annex the territories of Jammu and Kashmir under its control,” he warned.

Please comment on the Bold Part. If Pakistan can Do it .. why not India ?
 
. .
Thanx for th reply. Much appreciated.
Actually i mean is the Legal or lets say... the outcome part :

“Constitutionally and legally, the territory of Gilgit-Baltistan is part of the state of Jammu and Kashmir and any attempt to secede it from the disputed region will deal a blow to the stand of Pakistan and Kashmiris regarding the longstanding dispute,” said Sardar Abid Hussain Abid, AJK Minister for Information, while talking to Dawn.

“But the federal government should avoid annexing the territory as a province, lest India may use it a justification to annex the territories of Jammu and Kashmir under its control,” he warned.

Please comment on the Bold Part. If Pakistan can Do it .. why not India ?

Pakistan never did though, did it?
 
.
Back
Top Bottom