5 Turkish Weapons of War Russia Should Fear

[Gerri Dudzinski]

Russia will not fear from these weapons, as we all know that Russia has also latest and advance technology of weapons. But one important thing is that Turkey will use these weapons on the permission of USA and will have the support of USA as well. So we can say that Turkey will have more strength and power as compare to Russia.

 

[TopCat]

This a widely held disbelieve stem from the ignorance of facts. Russians were bombing Syrian Turks who are a first line of defence for Turkey against ISIS and PYG/Kurd Rebels. Turks has repeatedly warn russia not to attack them.

These Turkmen occupy important strategic location which connecting major supply line to the west of the country including Aleppo with the cover from Turkey. Syria tried to break the siege from the very beginning.

 

[Sipahi]

Russia was not able to beat Taliban .. Let alone Türkiye.

 

[jammersat]

SAT Naval Commandos

Is that a Commando with an RPG-7 ? lol , never seen such a commando

Russia was not able to beat Taliban .. Let alone Türkiye.

Back then it was the "mujahideen" not Taliban

 

[Silverblaze]

This a widely held disbelieve stem from the ignorance of facts. Russians were bombing Syrian Turks who are a first line of defence for Turkey against ISIS and PYG/Kurd Rebels. Turks has repeatedly warn russia not to attack them.

Well sir, the Syrian turkmen are fighting Assad and 'his' Syrian state who is besieged by Daesh itself. So by attacking assad's army who is fighting Daesh, what does one gain?

Yes, the turkmen were treated badly, but they are rebels after all. No one is exactly right here.

 

[Providence]

Sir tell me one example after WWII where Russia won against proper militery force like Turkey. Just one example they always launch attacks one small defenceless states.

Only poor military planners under estimate their foes. Turkey and NATO consider Russia a formidable force any day.

Let's see if Russia underestimates NATO and returns the favor


As for their Afghan fiasco, they didn't bring in their air-force and lot of front-line weapons to keep the war from spilling into a major war. US/Saudi/Pak military planners took advantage of this fact in defeating USSR.

War planning is not about a linear escalation from rockets to nukes at both ends, it's about evaluating the sub-theaters of war, tactical weapon deployment apt for the sub theater, the elbow-room available to the adversary in the sub-theater and then building enough agility in the doctrine that you are able to switch tactics as the sub-theater evolves !

Also, across the front of engagement, there are multiple sub-theaters which have their own dynamics. A careful military planner optimizes resources based on their evaluation. US with it's seemingly unlimited resource are also bound by these dynamics and so is everybody else.

This is why comments like "russian bear will nuke turkey", "Russian will eat turkey for breakfast" is patently ludicrous and only indicative of the mental ability of the poster and nothing to do with reality.

 

[Bratva]

Well sir, the Syrian turkmen are fighting Assad and 'his' Syrian state who is besieged by Daesh itself. So by attacking assad's army who is fighting Daesh, what does one gain?

Yes, the turkmen were treated badly, but they are rebels after all. No one is exactly right here.

In this proxy war, No one got a upper moral hand. Everyone is trying to save his side. Consider AFPAK region. What Pakistan has done to counter Afghan/Indian Proxies in Afghanistan. Do you think Turkey would sit idle while US arms Kurds rebel to the teeth and there comes a time when they will bite turkish butt with a lethal force and tactics ?

 

[jammersat]

i agree with @Providence , The US wants to portray the afghanistan war as something equivalent to vietnam , while it was obviously not , much lesser than vietnam it was , the break up of the soviet union had more to do with the iranian revolution than afghanistan

 

[Providence]

i agree with @Providence , The US wants to portray the afghanistan war as something equivalent to vietnam , while it was obviously not , much lesser than vietnam it was , the break up of the soviet union had more to do with the iranian revolution than afghanistan

USSR with it's political economic system was bound to fail. Afghanistan might have just hastened the event.

Irrespective of whatsoever disadvantage of capitalism, there is always a fighting chance to make to the top. It gives hope which is quintessential to human existence.

USSR produced sub-standard industrial goods throughout the 1900s on the backs of millions of political prisoners. It could never have sustained the fight with US.

 

[Sipahi]

Keep up such attitude and your army will fail everywhere ! Trust me !

My army is currently kicking the A** of TTP in North Waziristan.....

Is that a Commando with an RPG-7 ? lol , never seen such a commando



Back then it was the "mujahideen" not Taliban

Whoever that was, they were failed against them, after that NATO failed.

 

[Providence]

My army is currently kicking the A** of TTP in North Waziristan.....

I normally dont talk ill of any country's military. My respect flies out to all braves. Intent was to just drive home the fact that, your logic was fallible and such inductive deductions are not applicable to war !

 

[jammersat]

USSR with it's political economic system was bound to fail. Afghanistan might have just hastened the event.

Irrespective of whatsoever disadvantage of capitalism, there is always a fighting chance to make to the top. It gives hope which is quintessential to human existence.

USSR produced sub-standard industrial goods throughout the 1900s on the backs of millions of political prisoners. It could never have sustained the fight with US.

what? if it's slave labor you're talking about then why hasn't the USA already fell ?!

Whoever that was, they were failed against them, after that NATO failed.

They don't look like commandos to me , much like turkish college girls who are whispering together instead , like the israeli hagganah who always come in large groups

 

[Sipahi]

what? if it's slave labor you're talking about then why hasn't the USA already fell ?!



They don't look like commandos to me , much like turkish college girls who are whispering together instead , like the israeli hagganah who always come in large groups

Absolutely but what they did with super powers ??? One can only laugh ....

 

[monitor]

Turkey don't have any long range air defence system and any long rang ballastic or cruse missile capability which Russia already shown to the world and it's enemy. Tell one weapons which can attack Russian main land and not forget lethal s-300/400 airdefence system whjch can make any Turkish fighter and cruse missile redundant. And for submarine Russia have more subsurface capability then turkey to loss few to Turkish force.

Bleda Kurtdarcan is a lecturer at Galatasaray University School of Law in Istanbul, where he teaches public international law. He obtained his Ph.D. from Galatasaray University in 2014 and his LLM from Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne in 2005. He specializes in law of armed conflict, law of the sea, maritime security, and the privatization of military service

This idiot degree should cancel.

 

[Zarvan]

Turkey don't have any long range air defence system and any long rang ballastic or cruse missile capability which Russia already shown to the world and it's enemy. Tell one weapons which can attack Russian main land and not forget lethal s-300/400 airdefence system whjch can make any Turkish fighter and cruse missile redundant. And for submarine Russia have more subsurface capability then turkey to loss few to Turkish force.





This idiot degree should cancel.

Turkey needs to increase size of its Air Force develop Long Range Ballistic and Cruise Missiles and also Destroyers.