What's new

5 Turkish Weapons of War Russia Should Fear

If we manage to blind s400 radar with this jammers, the whole world will asking for. Please give me give a one.
this depends on which system is better KORAL or Krasukha-4
Judging from the dimensions of KORAL's antenna system, it is designed to jam airborne c and x band radars. So it is useless against surveillance radar of s-400, since it works in the decimeter s band. This system is also useless against target aiming radar of s-400 as it is evident that the source of jamming signal from the terrain misses the sector of the aiming radar beam. This system can be useful only against homing heads of s-400 missiles, but again, if the source of jamming signal get into the sector of the missile homing head beam. Оnly airborne jammers are effective against ground air defense systems. However, one should consider the limited power of the air jammers and thus a relatively small range.
 
12308799_855287807911382_7308620039717887997_n.jpg
the guy that shot the su
O bir Azeri fotografci..
Arap gazeteleri: İşte Rus uçağını vuran Türk pilotu!

Missile loading is fast, my friend ... it's not a problem for Top5 to produce enough numbers of SAM more than enemy's fighters. How do u think U.S will support Turkey to risk fight with Russia? absolutely not ... just remember Turkey only has 250x F-16s, not a deadly numbers for Top5 in a general war.
View attachment 275885
View attachment 275886



LOL ... if u think u can stronger than NAZI Germany and defeat Russia, u can take a seat in UNSC ... but that's impossible.
This tactic is oneough to convince you to stop the production of SAM against Turkey..
 
Judging from the dimensions of KORAL's antenna system, it is designed to jam airborne c and x band radars. So it is useless against surveillance radar of s-400, since it works in the decimeter s band. This system is also useless against target aiming radar of s-400 as it is evident that the source of jamming signal from the terrain misses the sector of the aiming radar beam. This system can be useful only against homing heads of s-400 missiles, but again, if the source of jamming signal get into the sector of the missile homing head beam. Оnly airborne jammers are effective against ground air defense systems. However, one should consider the limited power of the air jammers and thus a relatively small range.

@victor07 People claim that Krasushka-4 can even jam and destroy electronic components of low orbit satellites , hostile radars and even AEW planes. What about that. Is Krasushka-4 an giant microwave emitter ?
If yes , what about operating crew ? We know that many Hawk Radar- crews suffered cancer in early times.
 
@victor07 People claim that Krasushka-4 can even jam and destroy electronic components of low orbit satellites , hostile radars and even AEW planes. What about that. Is Krasushka-4 an giant microwave emitter ?
If yes , what about operating crew ? We know that many Hawk Radar- crews suffered cancer in early times.
In R&D of the receivers possible impact of powerful electromagnetic radiation is taken into account. I think temporary fault under the influence of powerful radiation is possible, but if radiation is turned off, electronic device restores (if not, probably it is due to bad design or production). It's like to look at bright light. Danger to a crew certainly exists, comparison to the microwave oven is correct. Note, for example that cockpit on AWACS, A-50 are covered with conductive coating. This is for protection from radiation of own radar.
 
Thank you for the short but clear explanation. Hope that Russo-Turk relations will soon get better. :tup:
Either Russia nor Turkey, except third countries, can profit from that conflict.
 
In R&D of the receivers possible impact of powerful electromagnetic radiation is taken into account. I think temporary fault under the influence of powerful radiation is possible, but if radiation is turned off, electronic device restores (if not, probably it is due to bad design or production). It's like to look at bright light. Danger to a crew certainly exists, comparison to the microwave oven is correct. Note, for example that cockpit on AWACS, A-50 are covered with conductive coating. This is for protection from radiation of own radar.


wouldn't that also damage Russia and other ally systems as well??

assuming they aren't protected from EM damage
 
wouldn't that also damage Russia and other ally systems as well??

assuming they aren't protected from EM damage

That was also my concern and fear, especially damage to human health.
I know that hundreds of Nike and Hawk Radar operators suffered later cancer, in the early years of the systems
 
Judging from the dimensions of KORAL's antenna system, it is designed to jam airborne c and x band radars. So it is useless against surveillance radar of s-400, since it works in the decimeter s band. This system is also useless against target aiming radar of s-400 as it is evident that the source of jamming signal from the terrain misses the sector of the aiming radar beam. This system can be useful only against homing heads of s-400 missiles, but again, if the source of jamming signal get into the sector of the missile homing head beam. Оnly airborne jammers are effective against ground air defense systems. However, one should consider the limited power of the air jammers and thus a relatively small range.


Ther is no one informatio about that and you are the expert?
 
Judging from the dimensions of KORAL's antenna system, it is designed to jam airborne c and x band radars. So it is useless against surveillance radar of s-400, since it works in the decimeter s band. This system is also useless against target aiming radar of s-400 as it is evident that the source of jamming signal from the terrain misses the sector of the aiming radar beam. This system can be useful only against homing heads of s-400 missiles, but again, if the source of jamming signal get into the sector of the missile homing head beam. Оnly airborne jammers are effective against ground air defense systems. However, one should consider the limited power of the air jammers and thus a relatively small range.

Koral's working ET/ED frequency range is between 0.4 GHz to 40 GHz.It means it is already reaching Ka band. It covers all frequency listed below.

If you don't know too much, you can ask uncle Google.

Band designation Frequency range


UHF 0.3 to 1 GHz Ultra High Frequency
L 1 to 2 GHz Long wave
S 2 to 4 GHz Short wave
C 4 to 8 GHz Compromise between S and X
X 8 to 12 GHz Used in WW II for fire control, X for cross (as in crosshair). Exotic.
Ku 12 to 18 GHz Kurz-under
K 18 to 27 GHz German Kurz (short)
Ka 27 to 40 GHz Kurz-above
 
Last edited:
Russia should fear F 16 ? lol

Russia, just by disabling turkish airfields with cruise missiles, is more or less removing this threat

What Turkey should be aware of, Istanbul goes into black out, for quit some time, in case of a war, maybe turkish elites realized this
 
What Turkey should be aware of, Istanbul goes into black out, for quit some time, in case of a war, maybe turkish elites realized this
What black-out man ??? We are not living in 50s...
 
What black-out man ??? We are not living in 50s...

Power_outage

Turkish power grid is at hand for russian airplane based weapons, russian one is out of touch for turkish

Thats the real problem for Turkey. Disabling the power distrubution transformers and economy halt will become reality in your war against Russia
 
Power_outage

Turkish power grid is at hand for russian airplane based weapons, russian one is out of touch for turkish

Thats the real problem for Turkey. Disabling the power distrubution transformers and economy halt will become reality in your war against Russia
Mate, we don't need seerers like you....

Russia is not going to try to bomb a NATO country. Also, as you say it's a GRID,hitting a few places won't matter. Electric can be directed via other lines.

And what is going to happen to Russian economy when we close the straits ??

Russia acting like a child taking economic measures..it's laughable. We are going to export more gas from Azerbaijan and KRG and drop the percentage of the Russian gas. In economic means we can always hurt Russia more than they can hurt us.
 
Back
Top Bottom