5 major problems in the Pakistani psyche

[GURU DUTT]

nw dude next time if u come up with any wstn its better to come up with proof... but for the tym being u r getting this honour for the first and last time...
1) Lakhvi & hafiz saeed: wanted in Mumbai attack... any proof? yeah ajmal kasab... Pakistan never interrogate him, infact india didn't give the permission and the day they gave the permission he mysteriously died... Damn Man! any other proof rather than Milk Packets, infact there are a lot of controversies in ur media infact ur army personnel also gave the statements dat contradicts... so first come up with that proof that is solid as stone, so we can charge him, we have no tym for allegation responses.
2)Dawood Ibrahim & Chota Shakeel: indian is keep crying they are in Pak, but they never gave the exct location always keep saying they might b there in Pak or might b there in Pak, still an allegation, lets suppose they are in Pakistan for the SAKE OF ARGUEMENT thn stop crying in front of us. go to Interpol and tell them to do there job... Modi is Wanted in PAKISTAN, I launched a FIR against him regarding his statement of Bangladesh, first give him to Pak we will trial him thn we will see how we can accommodate u in ur matters.

we gave proofs with sound transkripts and many circumstantial evidence not just to pakistan but interpol and UNO and even USA which found owr evidence as adequate and valid thus have all declared dawood ibrahim ,hafiz saeed , lakhwi ,mashood azhar as international terrorists but your "superior/joke" judiciarry dint found them enof even when its aquitting 10 attackers of malala yusufzai deu to lack of evidnce

now as for NaMo he is elcted PM of India who got more votes than any other PM/President candidate in history and unlike your nation we have trust in owr institutions and dont cry dhandhlli after things dont work owt for us

so pakistan can say anything it wants no one in the world trust pakistan any more deu to there denial attitude and corrupt work profile while the same people are linning in india todo buisness with us (even your birader islamik mulks and all weather friends have invested in india)

ever wonderred why ?

but sir you dint tell me who and why declared fatima jinnah as traitor and RAW agent and evebn your TV anchor Dr Shahid masood had done a programme on this topic please tell me im waiting

 

[Captain.x]

but sir you dint tell me who and why declared fatima jinnah as traitor and RAW agent and evebn your TV anchor Dr Shahid masood had done a programme on this topic please tell me im waiting

I didn't see that program may b after I see I can comment on that what he said in what regard... anyhow I hope this will clear ur mind... who and why accused FATIMA JINNAH a RAW agent..
1)How Fatima Jinnah died — an unsolved criminal case - Blogs - DAWN.COM
2)When Ayub Khan Accused Fatima Jinnah Of Being An Indian And American Agent | Pak Tea House

 

[VCheng]

2. Secularism solves everything
This liberal premise holds that Pakistan is grounded by its "Islamic Republic" roots. Yes, and no. Pakistan is an ideological state created in the name of Islam for the Muslims of the Indian subcontinent. Without this binding glue, the country is just a bunch of mutually suspicious ethnicities that keep bringing up secession. Over the years, there have been separatistmovements for each province barring Punjab. The army, fiercely nationalistic, has caned the dissidents into place thus far, but force won't work forever. The call-to-arms for the Pakistan Movement was "Pakistan ka matlab kiya? La ilaha Ilallah (What does Pakistan mean? There is no God but Allah)". You take Islam out of Pakistan's constitution and the federation is meaningless.
"Every dictatorship in Pakistan has eventually hankered for public validation, and in the process, counter-intuitively allied itself with the same mouldy faces it kicked out."

Nobody is arguing for secularism in Pakistan, or for removal of Islam from all spheres of life. To say either is wrong and disingenuous. The argument is for a government and state that works equally for ALL its citizens, and for that to happen, religion must not form part of the State. It can remain dominant in the private lives of most of its citizens as they see fit, without any imposition from the State itself. This keeps Islam vibrant and strong for its followers without any concerns. Religion as State policy has been an utter disaster for Pakistan and it is time for this experiment to stop if the country is to survive, plain and simple.

 

[Sky lord]

Modi is coming to cope with it, don't panic my friend.

72 posts and 3 negative ratings in one day? Wah ....must be a record.

Nobody is arguing for secularism in Pakistan, or for removal of Islam from all spheres of life. To say either is wrong and disingenuous. The argument is for a government and state that works equally for ALL its citizens, and for that to happen, religion must not form part of the State. It can remain dominant in the private lives of most of its citizens as they see fit, without any imposition from the State itself. This keeps Islam vibrant and strong for its followers without any concerns. Religion as State policy has been an utter disaster for Pakistan and it is time for this experiment to stop if the country is to survive, plain and simple.

A state that works for all citizens should be the ultimate aim, however Religion has been too useful a tool in the past. I don't see politicians or army giving it up so easily. People have a simple straight forward religiosity which is being misused by those in power for their own ends.

 

[VCheng]

A state that works for all citizens should be the ultimate aim, however Religion has been too useful a tool in the past. I don't see politicians or army giving it up so easily. People have a simple straight forward religiosity which is being misused by those in power for their own ends.

That is why Pakistan is at a crossroads. What it chooses in how to evolve the relationship between the State and Religion will determine which century it will find itself in, figuratively speaking, of course.