What's new

Featured 44 Indian Banks involved in money laundering - FinCEN Reveals

World might not know, or deliberately close its eyes, but Pakistan has been directly affected by Indian state sponsored terrorism. Problem with India is that it sends state actors to spread terrorism. Hussain Mubarak Patel/ Kulhushan is the prime example of what India does. So yes, you can't club Pakistan with India as I don't know if Pakistan has ever sent a serving officer to spread terrorism in any country. Indian Navy commander operating on a genuine passport issued by Indian government with a different identity is something that should raise some alarms.

Pakistan had weak legislation around money laundering and many of us supported FATF requirements. This weakness was mostly used by corrupt politicians and because of that Pakistan has suffered in the past.

We know that FATF is a tool and if no action is taken against India, our stance will obviously be validated. Even if no terrorist link is found, 40 banks including national banks involved in suspiious transactions should be enough to put Indian into the grey list at least.

Anyway, Pakistan will try and will not leave the space unchecked even if it results in no action.
Except no country apart from Pakistan has accused India for sponsoring militants. Pakistan on it's own is not a credible source for such allegations. Jadhav at best is a spy, has become the poster boy of terrorism in Pakistan. Not only you failed to provide any credible evidence for his involvement, but filed a useless dossier at UN, named RAW, supposedly exposing intel operations in Pakistan? Last but not least, went to UNSC sanctions committee for some unknown Indians to get them sanctioned and got unanimously 'laughed out'.

Bangladesh has even shoddy banking regulations, if you remember, it was some Bangladeshis who were involved in a huge bank heist in Philippines involving millions of dollars. And the banking regulators in Bangladesh were helpless, no Pakistan is not in FATF because India or US pushed you to a corner, but due to credible proofs that Pakistan had in fact aided and funded militant groups. You were put on FATF list, not just because your banks had poor regulatory safeguard, but your state institutions failed to stop funding of groups like LeT, JeM etc...

If you think this will put India in FATF grey list, I'd say don't get your hopes up. Your tit for tat diplomacy is hilarious. It'll only make you look like a joke, but hey why should we stop you from embarrassing yourself.
 
.
You are irrational, emotional and angry. Your reply says it all.

Fact is they were caught in your country so giving it a different spin isn't very smart. It is no secret that India is a hub for criminal financing. Terror financing against Pakistan is also perpetrated through Indian banks.
Even if terror financing link is not found (deliberately due to the market size), FATF is not about terror financing only.

" The Financial Action Task Force (FATF) is the global money laundering and terrorist financing watchdog. The inter-governmental body sets international standards that aim to prevent these illegal activities and the harm they cause to society. As a policy-making body, the FATF works to generate the necessary political will to bring about national legislative and regulatory reforms in these areas. "
 
.
You are irrational, emotional and angry. Your reply says it all.

Fact is they were caught in your country so giving it a different spin isn't very smart. It is no secret that India is a hub for criminal financing. Terror financing against Pakistan is also perpetrated through Indian banks.
If you say so. lol But I'd admit, the ignorance of you guys on the matter is quite frustrating. Anyway, I'll give the list of countries who are going to be on FATF grey list for financing terrorism :laugh: because of FinCEN files.
  • Deutsche Bank – $1.3 trillion (Germany)
  • JPMorgan Chase – $514 billion (United States of America)
  • Standard Chartered – $166 billion (United Kingdom)
  • Bank of New York Mellon – $64 billion (United States of America)
  • Barclays – $21 billion (United Kingdom)
  • HSBC – $4.4 billion (United Kingdom)
  • Bank of China – $1.3 billion (China)
  • Bank of America – $384 million (US)
  • Citibank – $251 million (US)
  • Wells Fargo – $57 million (US)
Your understanding of the matter is poor. Now try and spin a new excuse for India to be on FATF grey list.
 
.
If you say so. lol But I'd admit, the ignorance of you guys on the matter is quite frustrating. Anyway, I'll give the list of countries who are going to be on FATF grey list for financing terrorism :laugh: because of FinCEN files.
  • Deutsche Bank – $1.3 trillion (Germany)
  • JPMorgan Chase – $514 billion (United States of America)
  • Standard Chartered – $166 billion (United Kingdom)
  • Bank of New York Mellon – $64 billion (United States of America)
  • Barclays – $21 billion (United Kingdom)
  • HSBC – $4.4 billion (United Kingdom)
  • Bank of China – $1.3 billion (China)
  • Bank of America – $384 million (US)
  • Citibank – $251 million (US)
  • Wells Fargo – $57 million (US)
Your understanding of the matter is poor. Now try and spin a new excuse for India to be on FATF grey list.

No matter what you say, you are caught. 44 Indian banks were caught in illicit transactions. You are indeed in trouble.
 
. . . . .
How come India isn't under FATF watch list?


So this is how this Nazi Country India supports and finances Terrorists.


44 Indian banks reported to watchdog for large suspicious transactions


KARACHI: At least 44 Indian banks have been identified in connection with transactions by Indian entities and individuals in a set of Suspicious Activity Reports (SARs) filed by US banks with the watchdog, the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN), an investigation by The Indian Express has revealed.

According to a set of records of parties with Indian addresses, Indian banks figure in SARs linked to over 2,000 transactions valued at over $1 billion between 2011 and 2017. Significantly, there are thousands of transactions linked to Indian entities and businessmen where the Indian senders or beneficiaries have addresses in foreign jurisdictions.

Records investigated show that Indian banks mentioned in the SARs include: state-owned Punjab National Bank (290 transactions); State Bank of India (102); Bank of Baroda (93); Union Bank of India (99) and Canara Bank (190), among others.

Among private banks that figure in the SARs are HDFC Bank (253 transactions); ICICI Bank (57); Kotak Mahindra Bank (268); Axis Bank (41) and IndusInd Bank (117) among others.


According to the newspaper, the foreign banks that have filed the SARs include Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas (DBTCA), BNY Mellon, Citibank, Standard Chartered and JP Morgan Chase among others.

Indian banks figure in the SARs primarily because they are “correspondent banks” to the foreign banks which have filed these SARs and figure in the network through which these transactions have been effected.

Records show there are cases where ‘suspicious transactions’ have been carried out through the international payment gateway of foreign banks, said the paper. In others, foreign branches of Indian banks such as a State Bank of India account in Canada and an account of Union Bank of India in the UK have been used by clients for carrying out part of the transactions in question.

Key to this is the correspondent banking relationship — an arrangement over which there has been growing concern as regulators crack down on secrecy of offshore transactions.


Under this arrangement, one bank (correspondent) holds deposits owned by other banks (respondents) and provides payment and other services to those respondent banks. Through correspondent banking relationships, banks can access financial services in different jurisdictions and provide cross-border payment services to their customers.

In the SARs, the foreign banks have cited a slew of reasons to red-flag these transactions, including “high-risk jurisdiction for money laundering or other financial crimes”, adverse media/public information on the client, “unidentified” parties, and the fact that “source of funds and purpose of transaction could not be ascertained”.

Meanwhile, there has been growing concern among banks over the idea of correspondent banking. According to a report on the issue by the Committee on Payments and Market Infrastructures (CPMI) of the Bank for International Settlements, prepared in 2016, banks providing these services are reducing their relationships.


The report says that rising costs and uncertainty about how far customer due diligence should be carried out in order to ensure regulatory compliance have been one of the key reasons for banks to cut back their correspondent relationships.

The report made several recommendations including standardisation of KYC norms and using legal entity identifiers in correspondent banking. It also recommended that global watchdogs like the Financial Action Task Force and anti-money laundering task force explore ways to tackle obstacles to information-sharing, with the aim of identifying potential best practices.

While mails sent to 10 banks for their comments on the SARs did not elicit any response, a spokesperson for the State Bank of India, in his response, said: “The information sought herewith is not available with the bank due to the SAR confidentiality regulations.

“The Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) has issued an advisory that any unauthorised disclosure of a SAR is a violation of US federal law… Both civil and criminal penalties may be imposed for SAR disclosure violations.
 
. . .
@Dalit @ps3linux what do you gentlemen think?

Word is "stupid is what stupid does"

I don't bother with sanghis from our east.

Currently out of station, but I will have to look at the details on the amount of transactions done, a jerk from my old company in states send me something "6 Pakistani bank report SAR" you don't have to second guess the nationality of such people.

Problem is that people in finance must keep their knowledge updated, since I had studied so my response was "US $1.9 million out of a total of US $2 Trillion by Pakistani banks, wow, FATF must black list us immediate, because Pakistani banks were responsible for 0.0000975% of the total transactions such a huge percentage"

As for the F.Is of gutterland let me have a look at the magnitude of transactions and I'll get back "hopefully"
 
Last edited:
.
India caught in dirty money games
Reports show 44 state-owned and private banks conducted suspicious transactions


Hammad SarfrazSeptember 27, 2020

national-Flag-reuters-6601601181727-0.jpg


KARACHI:
After failed attempts to push Pakistan to the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) blacklist, over accusations of money laundering and terror financing, India itself has been caught with its pants down.

Records released by US Department of Treasury's FinCEN, the Financial Crimes Investigation Network, show 44 state-owned and private banks in India conducted suspicious transactions. In total, these banks carried 2,000 transactions valued at over $1 billion between 2011 and 2017.Data gathered by the International Consortium of Investigative Journalism (ICIJ) from the suspicious activity reports (SAR) filed by US banks, shows that the flagged transactions carried by the Indian banks could be relate to activities such as money laundering, terrorism and drugs.

Commenting on the damning report on India’s illicit financial activities, Dr. Shahida Wizarat, Head of Economics Department, Institute of Business Management, said “Pakistan needs to raise this issue at every forum. Islamabad needs to assemble a coalition of countries that have been at the receiving end of India’s terrorism to raise this matter before the International Court of Justice, the United Nations and FATF.”

Dr. Wizarat, who frequently writes on the subject said: “India is known for its role in sponsoring terrorism and it definitely entails money laundering.

”According to the suspicious activity reports, several Indian banks were involved in the illegal flow of money within and outside the country. These banks include the State Bank of India, Punjab National Bank, Union Bank of India, Bank of Baroda, Canara Bank, HDFC Bank, ICICI Bank, Kotak Mahindra Bank, Axis Bank and IndusInd Bank, among others.

For decades, financial experts believe, India and its western allies, have ramped up pressure on Pakistan, accusing it of supporting flow of money through illegal channels. The damning exposé, one expert said, comes just in time for the upcoming FATF plenary meeting
in October.

“Now is an opportunity for Pakistan to highlight the dark side of India. After the eye-opening revelation, India and her allies have no moral authority to blackmail Pakistan,” said Dr. Ashfaque Hasan Khan, Member of the Prime Minister’s Economic Advisory Council.

“Those who blame Pakistan in the FATF should see their own face in the mirror, which has been exposed,” said the Islamabad-based expert on economic issues.
Pakistan, Dr. Hasan said, has taken extraordinary steps to get out of the grey list. “Before lecturing us they should eliminate the sanctuaries of laundered money in the world, including India.”

Dr. Hasan said Pakistan needs to be on the offensive at the upcoming FATF meeting. “Pakistan has done a lot and it is time that we stop being apologetic,” the veteran expert added.

The Narendra Modi government in New Delhi has been the key force behind the campaign to move Pakistan from the FATF grey list to the blacklist. Despite all its efforts, Pakistan has managed to stay away from being blacklisted under the Financial Action Task Force.

Experts also believe China has an important role to play during the crucial meeting of the Asia Pacific Joint Group of the global terror-financing watchdogs, which is now just days away.“It is the most opportune time to take this case up at the upcoming FATF meeting. Since China plays an important role, it should act,” urged Dr. Wizarat, who believes India’s financial support for terror activities is also hurting Beijing’s interests in the region.

India, the Karachi-based expert said, has been exporting terrorism not just to Pakistan but to all its neighbors. “Pakistan needs to aggressively assemble a case against India and make sure all countries that have suffered at the hands of New Delhi are part of this campaign,” she added.

When asked about the reaction of India’s allies in the west, Dr. Wizarat said, “There is a lot of deception in the western policies. The United States and other western countries accuse Pakistan of money laundering because they are doing it themselves,” she said bluntly.

India has mostly been denying its role in terror financing and has used every opportunity to level the blame against Pakistan. Aiming her guns at Washington DC, Dr. Wizarat said, “The West and the US in particular can no longer be selective in its actions against money laundering.”

Recalling the infamous case of Raymond Davis, an American official, who was charged with murdering two Pakistanis, Dr. Wizarat said: “Mr. Davis was caught with a briefcase full of US dollars.” “Was that money brought in through legal channels,” questioned Dr. Wizarat. “A naval officer named Kulbhushan Jadhav, arrested in 2016 and charged with espionage, was also caught with cash,” she added.


The Karachi-based expert also warned that India has been using illegal channels to fund activities that can derail the peace talks in Afghanistan.
“If India is derailing the peace process in Afghanistan with the objective to destabilize Pakistan, United States must take it seriously,” she cautioned.
Last month, Munir Akram, Pakistan’s envoy to the United Nations, warned that India was sponsoring terrorism from Afghanistan into Pakistan.

“We have plenty of evidence that indicates that India is sponsoring terrorism from Afghanistan into Pakistan. We have evidence, we presented the evidence, and we're prepared to present more evidence," the diplomat said in a post on Twitter following an interview with Newsweek’s Tom O'Connor.

At the upcoming FATF meeting, experts believe Pakistan must take India to task for its illicit financial activities.
“Such high level of irregularities from more than 40 Indian banks shows that financial regulatory bodies must take up India’s case and must take it seriously” said a senior government official. “Pakistan needs to corner India with all the evidence,” he added.

The recently revealed documents show more than $2 trillion of suspicious financial transactions were carried out around the world between 1999 and 2017. The list of financial institutions involved in the illicit flow of money includes names of top global lenders.

 
.
i do not know what the definition of a suspicious transaction. 2000 transactions totaling $1 billion over 6 years sounds a little puny to me
 
.
i do not know what the definition of a suspicious transaction. 2000 transactions totaling $1 billion over 6 years sounds a little puny to me
That's a lot if used for terrorism or other illicit activities. Rules are rules. India will be audited by Fatf next year. It should explain its lax rules. Today....most terrorists will have an easier time funneling money through Indian banks then Pakistani banks.
 
.
Back
Top Bottom