40 jihad brides sentenced to death in Iraq

[raptor22]

(1) Children should be taken away from all the ISIS brides, till the time it has been proved that they don't have any ISIS tendencies and they are loyal to the country's law.

(2) And all ISIS brides cases should be studies individually.
If it is proved that they didn't take part in any anti-human crimes, and will respect the country law, then they should be released.
It seems many ladies recognized later that ISIS was a devil.

(3) But if it is proved that any lady took part in anti-human crimes, then she should be punished accordingly, even with the death. But the burden of strong proof still lies upon the government.

Well said, marring a villain ain't a crime though could be considered as disgrace. Kids obviously should be taken care of.

 

[BATMAN]

If Saddam remained focused on building his country..rather than useless invasion of Iran and Kuwait..he would be super power of Gulf...but many of these dictators wants short route to empire..rather than focusing on development and long term industrialization they want to wage only war..

Region was destabilized the day UK made Islam was introduced in Iran.... aka Islamic revolution.

 

[Hack-Hook]

Region was destabilized the day UK made Islam was introduced in Iran.... aka Islamic revolution.

Intrestingly some people consider another version of Islam UK made Islam approved by her majesty the queen .

 

[Gomig-21]

Death penalty is an abomination and should be abolished. Not just in Iraq but all over the world. If murder is bad , than a state should not kill a person in cold blood.

The death penalty, as a capital punishment, has a pretty interesting role in Israeli law, Sammy. While it is in fact law in Israel, it's not exercised as much as people would think.

The question always boils down to whether capital punishment does work as a deterrent for certain levels of crime or not. I would find it rather easy to decry that any act of terrorism must always be condemned by the death penalty. Others such as political assassinations -- especially assassinating a president -- or killing police officers or people who serve the state security apparatus could easily fall into that category as well, although it does get a bit more difficult as the level of authority diminishes. Then it opens the door for the argument as to whether a certain life is more valuable than another. But for terrorists, I have no problem whatsoever sending them to the gallows pole.

In this case here with these women, it's a delicate balance and should be decided based on the weight of the evidence as to complicity in any acts of terrorism. Merely being the spouses of terrorists doesn't cut it, frankly. Guilt by association doesn't seem to be deserving of the death penalty, unless that association bears the full extent of guilty complicity.

 

[BATMAN]

Intrestingly some people consider another version of Islam UK made Islam approved by her majesty the queen .

What caused the region to destabilized was religion introduced by Khomeni, because they wanted to influence, east - west and north south.
In east Zia ul Haq, blocked new religion to sweep across in Pakistan and Afghanistan, very tactfully but in west wards, Khomeni managed to lure Saddam to war.
Ever since, every regional war is ignited by followers of Khomeni.

 

[GiannKall]

because of the majority of sunni's supporting any outfit that fights against Iraqi or Syrian governments.

And why this is happening?

 

[Hack-Hook]

What caused the region to destabilized was religion introduced by Khomeni, because they wanted to influence, east - west and north south.
In east Zia ul Haq, blocked new religion to sweep across in Pakistan and Afghanistan, very tactfully but in west wards, Khomeni managed to lure Saddam to war.
Ever since, every regional war is ignited by followers of Khomeni.

First who is follower of Khomeini ?
Second who started all those wars ?
Third who's ideology group like al-Qaeda and ISIS follow ?

 

[raptor22]

What caused the region to destabilized was religion introduced by Khomeni, because they wanted to influence, east - west and north south.
In east Zia ul Haq, blocked new religion to sweep across in Pakistan and Afghanistan, very tactfully but in west wards, Khomeni managed to lure Saddam to war.
Ever since, every regional war is ignited by followers of Khomeni.

Khomeni managed to lure Saddam to war ..... then Who lured him in war against Kuwiat? Khomeni?

First of all there was no religion introduced back in 1979 by Khomaini that we don't know? if you have any proof of it that could shed a light on it please share it here and enlighten us,
Secondly I don't know why this new UK made Islam get sanctioned every day but this true face of Islam is welcomed by western countries and receive fancy weapons?

Lawrence of Arabia:


First Iraq:

Salah Omar al-Ali, Iraq's permanent ambassador to the United Nation back in 1979:

Poor Saddam didn't notice that evil Iranian were actually luring him to start war through diplomatic ways.

In East and in Afghanistan:

The US in cooperation with Saudi Arabia, the UAE and Pakistan lured the Soviet union to start war in Afghanistan:

Zbig:

"What Stansfield Turner was saying in 1995 was that Brzezinski’s well-known Russophobia led him to take advantage of the Soviet’s miscalculation. But it wasn’t until the 1998 Nouvel Observateur interview that Brzezinski boasted that he had provoked the invasion by getting Carter to authorize a Presidential finding to intentionally suck the Soviets in six months before they even considered invading. Yet, despite Brzezinski’s admission, Washington’s entire political spectrum continued to embrace his original false narrative that the Soviets had embarked on a world conquest."
Brzezinski Vision to Lure Soviets into ‘Afghan Trap’ Now Orlando’s Nightmare​

And ALQ and ISI in Iraq was result of Iraqi Baath commander and the same Mujaheddin.

 

[Falcon29]

You, like many other Arabs here and all around the world supported IS. Of course all of those will deny their way out of that now.

Oh you got us buddy ROFL .... Keep it up with the racism and sectarian perspective you have regarding Sunni's. Everyone that opposes Iranian interests in Arab nations is a takfiri/wahabi/ISIS in your people's eyes. That's what happens when you get too comfortable with yourselves. Unlike you, I don't leave people confused about my perspective/true outlook on things. If I saw anything in common with them I'd share that with people, I'm genuine and honest. But, I don't. Not even with your standard Salafi types. I've been banned from a notorious Arab Salafi forum for debating those likes. But what would it matter to you, you can continue with your lazy approach of trying to find an easy way out of every discussion.

Your opinion does not matter anyway, you're a foreigner. I don't stick my nose in Gaza's matters either, leave it up to us and have a good day. Not that you can do anything about it but support IS.

Kid, an international politics forum is probably not for you if you are concerned with people discussing international affairs, irregardless of background. You and I have no impact on the real world anyway, everything discussed here changes absolutely squat over there. This is an area of interest for people and that's all. And yes you've concerned yourself with Gaza's matters plenty of times before.

 

[sammuel]

The death penalty, as a capital punishment, has a pretty interesting role in Israeli law, Sammy. While it is in fact law in Israel, it's not exercised as much as people would think.

The question always boils down to whether capital punishment does work as a deterrent for certain levels of crime or not. I would find it rather easy to decry that any act of terrorism must always be condemned by the death penalty. Others such as political assassinations -- especially assassinating a president -- or killing police officers or people who serve the state security apparatus could easily fall into that category as well, although it does get a bit more difficult as the level of authority diminishes. Then it opens the door for the argument as to whether a certain life is more valuable than another. But for terrorists, I have no problem whatsoever sending them to the gallows pole.

In this case here with these women, it's a delicate balance and should be decided based on the weight of the evidence as to complicity in any acts of terrorism. Merely being the spouses of terrorists doesn't cut it, frankly. Guilt by association doesn't seem to be deserving of the death penalty, unless that association bears the full extent of guilty complicity.

There are many reasons why i am against death penalty, starting from the moral reasons -" though shall not kill ' . If you set out to reduce violence it is stange to do it by committing violence yourself.

But I am also against it cause of practical reasons , research show it does little to reduce crime.

I am also against the finality of it all , once you kill a person there is no going back , in too many cases authorities have been known to make mistakes. And i am not even starting on all those countries ( specially in our region ) who use capital punishment to eliminate political opposition.

That is why i don't think countries should be given this tool that they sometime misuse , abuse or just f*ck it up by making mistakes and executing the wrong man. We are only human after all.

 

[Gomig-21]

There are many reasons why i am against death penalty, starting from the moral reasons -" though shall not kill ' . If you set out to reduce violence it is stange to do it by committing violence yourself.

But I am also against it cause of practical reasons , research show it does little to reduce crime.

I am also against the finality of it all , once you kill a person there is no going back , in too many cases authorities have been known to make mistakes. And i am not even starting on all those countries ( specially in our region ) who use capital punishment to eliminate political opposition.

That is why i don't think countries should be given this tool that they some misuse , abuse or just f*ck it up by making mistakes and executing the wrong man. We are only human after all.

Completely agree. The risks of misusing it is certainly a big problem. But even if it doesn't really deter future, very violent crimes or even clear-cut cases of terrorism, it should still be implemented in those cases just for the sake of justice. One cannot go around blowing people up or killing an entire family with children and spend the rest of their lives in prison. If the justice system with appeals processes works like it's supposed to, then I think it's a must.

 

[Tokhme khar]

Go find the answer to this at Langley.

And why this is happening?

What you say is bullshit. Most sunni people around the world let alone here support ISIS, and before that Alqaeda. Don't be ashamed to admit it. Have a look at all the posts of the gulf arabs here. Die hard Daesh fans. lol

Stop spreading B.S. majority of Sunni has and will continue to condemn terrorism in any forms or shape.

 

[RoadRunner401]

What you say is bullshit. Most sunni people around the world let alone here support ISIS, and before that Al Qaeda. Don't be ashamed to admit it. Have a look at all the posts of the gulf arabs here. Die hard Daesh fans. lol

Once you understand the difference between Sunni and wahabi and you will get what I am saying.

 

[ReturningCamel]

Go find the answer to this at Langley.



What you say is bullshit. Most sunni people around the world let alone here support ISIS, and before that Alqaeda. Don't be ashamed to admit it. Have a look at all the posts of the gulf arabs here. Die hard Daesh fans. lol

In June 2014 they were all celebrating here. Sunni monkey bitches of satan! If IS was to rise up and take Baghdad or Iran half the forum would celebrate and justify it, half the Muslim world would celebrate.

Anyway Sunnism needs to be trashed as well.

 

[GiannKall]

What you say is bullshit. Most sunni people around the world let alone here support ISIS, and before that Alqaeda. Don't be ashamed to admit it. Have a look at all the posts of the gulf arabs here. Die hard Daesh fans. lol

ISIS is a deliberately vague term to justify war against any sunni in the area. Fact is that the current government in Iraq is a product of an illegal invasion of the United states