300 pakistan army soldiers killed in ceasefire violations by india since 2003

[Areesh]

Just like Abdul from Karachi or Wasim from Lahore have no right to tell a Kashmiri to leave his ancestral home.

Nope Abdul and Wasim both have greater right since both are closer to Kashmiris in every manner unlike ugly kamlesh and ramesh.

 

[Assasin Ezio]

No issues. The jaw of the enemy has been broken effectively in response.

View attachment 436812

More thrashing would continue when needed.

That's proven false information.
Actually the RTI activist Mr. Pankaj Darve, who claimed that has accepted that he mistakenly thought total number of deaths from all hostile and non hostile cause in army throughout India to be deaths on LoC.

Here is his Facebook page, you can ask him yourself:

He even accepted this on the phone:

 

[Areesh]

That's proven false information.

No it isn't.

Information is 100% authentic and credible.

 

[Jackdaws]

Nope Abdul and Wasim both have greater right since both are closer to Kashmiris in every manner unlike ugly kamlesh and ramesh.

Nope. Abdul and Wasim have 0 rights in every manner - and I don't judge the looks of men but whatever floats your boat.

 

[Areesh]

Nope. Abdul and Wasim have 0 rights in every manner - and I don't judge the looks of men but whatever floats your boat.

Both abdul and wasim have every right that is why you are here and discussing this.

 

[Assasin Ezio]

No it isn't.

Information is 100% authentic and credible.

Nope, the RTI activist who was the source of info himself accept ed it is False.

 

[PakSword]

Both abdul and wasim have every right that is why you are here and discussing this.

Itni nahi letay mehmaanon ki.. abhi ro raha hai betha apnay computer ke peechay..

 

[Kedardel]

One must add soldiers dying of Asmani Bizli in the casualities.

 

[Areesh]

Nope, the RTI activist who was the source of info himself accept ed it is False.

Nope you are needlessly trying too hard like your other profiles.

Information is authentic and completely reliable.

 

[Jackdaws]

Both abdul and wasim have every right that is why you are here and discussing this.

No, I am discussing this because it is entertaining. On what basis in your opinion, do these 2 chaps - Abdul and Wasim from Karachi and Lahore have the right to tell - let's say Omar and Gaurav from Srinagar?

 

[Trango Towers]

If you are so concerned about their welfare, offer them an opportunity to move to the other side of Kashmir and become Pakistani citizens - let's see how many bother to agree.

Their land will come with them. The opportunity for the Kashmiris on the Pakistani side is evident. They are more Pakistani than the rest of us.

We do not wish to oppress people. But the land cannot be acceded to pakistan. Pakistan has to force our hand. So far nothing has happened.

Then the status quo continues and as far as nothing has happened......well we both know that's not true now don't we

 

[313ghazi]

Might is right. Whoever is willing to do what it takes to win the war, will have whatever rights he should choose.

 

[Areesh]

No, I am discussing this because it is entertaining. On what basis in your opinion, do these 2 chaps - Abdul and Wasim from Karachi and Lahore have the right to tell - let's say Omar and Gaurav from Srinagar?

Gaurav is already a minority. Omar in most cases agrees with Abdul and Wasim. That gives adbul and wasim more right in addition to other reasons.

 

[Jackdaws]

Gaurav is already a minority. Omar in most cases agrees with Abdul and Wasim. That gives adbul and wasim more right in addition to other reasons.

So a minority has lesser rights? And what are the reasons?

Their land will come with them. The opportunity for the Kashmiris on the Pakistani side is evident. They are more Pakistani than the rest of us.

Evident to whom?

Might is right. Whoever is willing to do what it takes to win the war, will have whatever rights he should choose.

That is unfortunate. Might is not right. Ask the Vietnamese who gave a licking to the Americans.

 

[Trango Towers]

So a minority has lesser rights? And what are the reasons?



Evident to whom?


That is unfortunate. Might is not right. Ask the Vietnamese who gave a licking to the Americans.

Jack I guess arguing for the sake of arguing is an Indian past time. Have a good day