masterchief_mirza
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Apr 29, 2019
- Messages
- 9,706
- Reaction score
- 17
- Country
- Location
Like I said earlier, this makes it different to the Arab-Israeli conflicts. Pakistan deals bloody noses regularly to the Hindutva scumlords. If PAF can retain a technological edge, if PA can close the numerical gap with trained militias from the many willing volunteers in Pakistan, if China would be willing to at least build up troops at its border to draw some Indian soldiers away without necessarily joining a conflict, if there will be guaranteed support from all the local IOK resistance groups....with all that in place, why the heck shouldn't we attack India on humanitarian grounds to liberate the people of Kashmir.Do you think their plan will succeed? Especially with Pakistan as their neighbour? Will Pakistan army let this happen?
Russia has done this in Crimea and continues to support insurgencies of ethnic Russians elsewhere. Pakistan should look up to the Russian model. Turkey too seems to have had minor successes so far in the same type of war. Of course, India is not Ukraine or Syria.....but it also isn't Israel or USA. If PAF can get immediate air superiority, we can punch into the valley.
I think IK is sensible and won't rush into wars Willy nilly. The real problem is though that we may be forced to if a nakba occurs. Therefore, the above contingency plan (or some better one) to actually conventionally attack Hindustan MUST be in place, so that we know we are ready for all eventualities. The one thing I still disagree with IK on is his constant repetitions that we are ready to "defend Pakistan" but "we don't want war"... No, we should say all options remain open, and without stating explicitly, we should imply that we are prepared to conduct an OFFENSIVE war to liberate Kashmir if necessary.