AerospaceEngineer
BANNED
- Joined
- Jan 12, 2011
- Messages
- 680
- Reaction score
- 0
Around 2500
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That does not matter. No country is willing to get wiped out while helping another. France is not going to help the US in a MAD scenario. Why should they? It's not likely those nukes are going to make a difference.
In a MAD scenario only 2 countries are going down, others do not have to get involved.
You only need enough for 1 nuke war, because you are done after that anyway.
It makes no sense for China to launch unprovoked nuclear attack in an expanded nuclear war because "maybe" the scavengers might invade for the spoils. This does not make sense because China would be a nuclear wasteland and would probably still have the ability to land at least a handful of nukes on those scavenger countries. Today, there is UTTER TERROR when even threat of 1 single nuclear warhead is possible.The nuclear weapons as I know is not only to destroy a country's major enemies but also any forces that could harm them after the MAD.
so i think the Chinese are not stupid but very sure that they would drag every ones else down to the hell with them if China don't exist anymore! and I think the US or any nucleated countries have the same though like China either!?
My post was a reply to ChineseTiger, who seems to believe that more is better.It seems like your Netherlanders are so good to the Chinese or you have another reason to tell???
The nuclear weapons as I know is not only to destroy a country's major enemies but also any forces that could harm them after the MAD.
so i think the Chinese are not stupid but very sure that they would drag every ones else down to the hell with them if China don't exist anymore! and I think the US or any nucleated countries have the same though like China either!?
Yes,it's wate for china since wo never get to use them,so my question is why you India build them,will you get to use them and aim at whom?or,they are not enough then how much is?Whether you have 400 or 3000, you have enough. Building large numbers is a waste as one never gets to use them.
Yes,it's wate for china since wo never get to use them,so my question is why you India build them,will you get to use them and aim at whom?or,they are not enough then how much is?
Probable the same as CT and DT, they think it's a d*ck measuring contest.
And because it's a democracy the politicians who pull it off get electional brownie points.
Who cares who has bigger dong?
China makes sure it has always with 3000 nukes available in its stockpile so she does have enough firepower to blast anyone who can potentially cause the threat to her during the MAD.
You guys don't like it, but this is the reality.
in a MAD scenario, the thing to do is to 100% make sure that the enemy will be down and stay down as punishment for attacking you. 1000 warheads on a few hundred ICBMs is necessary just to cripple USA and Russia alone. At least 400 warheads must land to eliminate 80% of US industry and 60% of US population. Russia is more spread out, so 600 is necessary. To cripple India, we need even more.
3000 nuclear warheads is just the start of MAD.
My post was a reply to ChineseTiger, who seems to believe that more is better.
My logic is very simple:
1. In a MAD scenario there is nothing left after the MAD exchange. So why bother who is going to attack you after that. There is nothing left to attack but nuclear waste land, no population which is not doomed anyways.
2. The bigger the nuclear stockpile the harder it is to keep track and maintain it. And off course the more it is going to cost doing so.
3. For detterence it suffice to have just enough so nobody is willing to pay the price attacking you.
This logic is not that hard to follow is it?
Why waste resources that can surely be put to better use than just having a nuclear stockpile as big as possible?
If point 3 is met. do you really want more nukes and why?
As for the bolded part, why bother if there is nothing left to harm?
Please tell me the logic of having 100000 nukes is 500 are enough to detter anyone in attacking you.
How many locks do you have on your door? I suppose only just enough to keep unwanted guests outside and not 1000 just because you can put it on your door.
Maybe we Dutch can invade China after an MAD exchange and occupy those wonderfull nuclear wast land, polluted water supplies and burned down cities
India has a comparable number of population with China, and i am afraid after the MAD, we will have to fight with them with stick and stone.
hihi such a creative though
hey but have you forgot your close friend Japanese and Korean, also your long time brother Vietnamese who are dreaming and appealing to split China to pieces everyday!The Vietnamese and Filipinos are having wet dream to create a second "The rape of Nanking" to China, as a Chinese what do you think?
China has reserved many SRBMs/IRBMs with nuclear warheads for these nations.
During the exchange of MAD with US, we will make sure that all hostile nations surrounding us will get nuked into the stone age.
But India has huge population like us, so there would still be hundred of million remaining population after the MAD for both side.
Therefore the war with stick and stone could likely be happening.
China has reserved many SRBMs/IRBMs with nuclear warheads for these nations.
During the exchange of MAD with US, we will make sure that all hostile nations surrounding us will get nuked into the stone age.
But India has huge population like us, so there would still be hundred of million remaining population after the MAD for both side.
Therefore the war with stick and stone could likely be happening.
>>35300 nukesIf you nuke all the hostile nations surrounding you then what will be left of China ??
US attacked NATO and US bombs i.e. 13000-15000 bombs drop on China.
Russia attacked another 22000 bombs drops on China.
India attacked another 200-300 bombs drops on China.
so that makes 13000+22000+200=35300 bombs dropped on China....What will be left of China If 35300 bombs are dropped ??
But why should you be worried... you are chilling your @ss in some foreign country while advocating China to bomb others and ultimately get bombed to pre-stone age... wonder If the sun will ever rise in China after 35300 Nuclear bombs are dropped there...
If you nuke all the hostile nations surrounding you then what will be left of China ??
US attacked NATO and US bombs i.e. 13000-15000 bombs drop on China.
Russia attacked another 22000 bombs drops on China.
India attacked another 200-300 bombs drops on China.
so that makes 13000+22000+200=35300 bombs dropped on China....What will be left of China If 35300 bombs are dropped ??
But why should you be worried... you are chilling your @ss in some foreign country while advocating China to bomb others and ultimately get bombed to pre-stone age... wonder If the sun will ever rise in China after 35300 Nuclear bombs are dropped there...