You know I am still not satisfied with this theory.
@
OrionHunter where are you???High time you came to this thread and solved my queries.
Hi Levina, Ok I'm back in my hotel room after gallivanting in Bangalore. Actually busy trying to furnish my two new apartments I have bought!! And I'm so bushed, I just wanna have a beer and sleep!! But since you asked, I can't let you down, can I?
Talking of Black Holes, remember it's just a
theory! I had asked the famed Prof Michio Kaku the renowned theoretical physicist in America in a Q & A session whether BHs really exist. He insisted they do. I told him I don't believe in this theory but in the theory of the Electric Universe instead.
He did get a little pissed off, but then I stood my ground and told him that scientists usually make up the equations to suit their pet theories! To which he got more pissed!! Jeeez!
After reading through numerous papers, it does seem that black holes and even the Big Bang are myths perpetuated by a disingenuous coterie.
It has been recently proved that the black hole and the expanding Universe are not predicted by General Relativity at all!
As per Nikias Stavroulakis:
* The given distribution of matter cannot be reduced to a point.
* Black holes never appear in solutions of the Einstein equations.
Here’s some more gen, this time from New Scientist.....
A controversial alternative to black hole theory has been bolstered by observations of an object in the distant universe, researchers say. If their interpretation is correct, it might mean black holes do not exist and are in fact bizarre and compact balls of plasma called
MECOs (Magnetospheric Eternally Collapsing Object).
According to the MECO theory, objects in our universe can never actually collapse to form black holes. When an object gets very dense and hot, subatomic particles start popping in and out of existence inside it in huge numbers, producing copious amounts of radiation.
Outward pressure from this radiation halts the collapse so the object remains a hot ball of plasma rather than becoming a black hole.
"I believe this is the first evidence that the whole black hole paradigm is incorrect," says Darryl Leiter of the Marwood Astrophysics Research Center in Charottesville, Virginia, US, who co-authored the study. He says that where astronomers think they see black holes, they are actually looking at MECOs.
Stephen Hawking has now put forward a new theory that changes the way scientists view black holes, saying he was wrong about them in the past!
Dr David Whitehouse
BBC News Online science editor.
And here's what the fuss is all about. Take a look-see at this video. That would probably ease all the confusion.......
Cheers! I'm hitting the sack now!
![Lazy :lazy: :lazy:](/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/cute/lazy.gif)