nang2
SENIOR MEMBER
- Joined
- Dec 14, 2015
- Messages
- 5,742
- Reaction score
- 2
- Country
- Location
That means I believe all of them until otherwise.it's a simple yes or no question. would you believe someone that made those claims?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That means I believe all of them until otherwise.it's a simple yes or no question. would you believe someone that made those claims?
ok, do you believe in falsus in unum, falsus in omnibus?That means I believe all of them until otherwise.
Why would I call you when it can only prove that you can speak Chinese, not any of your 6 claims?Again, give me a call, you won't have to suspect no more.
oH my god. Can you just call me?
If I am not a Chinese, you talk to me, and I will be exposed rightaway, right?
Or you are too chicken to call? I mean Tiqiu did it, Han Patriot did it, why don't you do it?
You don't have to suspect no more, you will get an answer right a way, but I am afraid it is not going to be the answer you like.
Don't know what you talk about. I just believe whatever people claim until I have evidence to prove otherwise. Innocent until proven guilty.ok, do you believe in falsus in unum, falsus in omnibus?
Don't know what you talk about. I just believe whatever people claim until I have evidence to prove otherwise. Innocent until proven guilty.
Sure. But that is just being questionable. It doesn't mean everything is a lie. I don't need someone to be a saint to learn something valuable from him.falsus in unum, falsus in omnibus is a US legal term which means "if one thing is found to be a lie, then everything is questionable."
@LeGenD posts here excluding this one are strictly related to the topic of Chinese poetry, interpretation thereof and asking questions related to said poetry including questions related to background understanding.
I request absolutely no modification be done of any post here.
Correct another mistake. "镇渔阳" refers to deploying defense in "渔阳" (now Beijing), rather than conquering "渔阳".I never said it's 7000 km.
Sorry, you're so wrong. Almost no sentence is correct.
Dude, the keyword is "Someone"
If I think that the guy we are talking about is 霍去病, I would have said this instead of using the term "Someone"
where the last line is about how 霍去病 died a hundred time and still will not regret doing it for 漢殤帝 (Which is a king during East Han) related to the rest.
How hard is it to understand??
That's because you are too stupid to learn Chinese.
PS: Besides: I can learn Chinese even if I have never set foot on Chinese soil or had Chinese ancestors or citizenship. Knowledge of the language does not make me citizen of that particular country. Spy agencies are known to have horde of people whom they teach different languages
My opinion does not change, you are a fake. Sorry.
You asked for it, now dont go running to mods for complaining.
Tell me, what does 行 mean? You said Chinese is a contextual language. then you should know what that mean without me giving you any context, so tell me, what did 行 mean?Huo Qubing's emperor was Liu Che, Emperor Wu of Han, not 漢殤帝.
My God, there are nearly a thousand emperors in Chinese history, and Liu Che, Emperor Wu of Han, can be ranked in the top ten. From the age of 6 to 60, as long as they are Chinese, how can they not know that Huo Qubing is the two most powerful generals of Liu Che. The other is Wei Qing.
Emperor Wu of Han - Wikipedia
en.m.wikipedia.org
That's because your English is shitCorrect another mistake. "镇渔阳" refers to deploying defense in "渔阳" (now Beijing), rather than conquering "渔阳".
"渔阳" was China's territory as early as 5000 years ago, where there was no need to conquer.
Yes, you didn't say "7000 km", you said "7000 miles". That's worse.
Huo Qubing is not a general of the former British colony. How can he use "miles"?
View attachment 825468
I never said I was a military expert (or to put it better, too lazy to google stuff in that area). , but I can assure you I am pretty good in spotting fakers.I mean, sure, you said you know shit, but you never know enough about anything to challenge me or anyone in any professional, your stock may be higher if you come and say "You are wrong about XY and Z issue" but what you are doing now, is just talk.
LOL.