And what made Modi suddenly concerned of human rights issue in Baluchistan or kashmir? Its the popular unrest in the valley, isn't?Modi advocated for Human rights in Balochistan and not independence. Equivalence was made on human rights issues.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
And what made Modi suddenly concerned of human rights issue in Baluchistan or kashmir? Its the popular unrest in the valley, isn't?Modi advocated for Human rights in Balochistan and not independence. Equivalence was made on human rights issues.
Please do away with the selective reading. I said "sponsored" protesters. If you have any trouble with the word sponsored then you can refer to the dictionary.
The typical lying chutiya.
Like i said in another post on another thread , if you wished to intervene you should have done it quietly , not announce it from the ramparts of the red fort.Modi's attempt to bring up Baluchistan and Pakistani held Kashmir was a melancholic blunder. Surely he was critically under pressure with the civilian unrest in the valley and tried to equal the game, without realizing the psychological advantage Pakistan enjoys in the Indian side and India do not in the Pakistani side. This attack is a roundabout response from Pakistan that Baluchistan or West Kashmir is not same as Indian Kashmir.
Point 1. Militants approached in a circuitous route.
Point 2. Int warnings non-sepcific were there
Point 3. You know the terrain, one can pass through howsoever many troops you place. The location is in proximity to LOC.
Point 4. There were no walls/partial walls. Contact took place at an entrance point. Stand off kills achieved. Very rapid access to barracks. Inside job (a local kashmiri employed there) is suspected and likely.
Point 5. Irrelevant. More pertinent is that NS addresses UNGA in 3 days time, more of a chance to raise the spectre? If Indians start the usual chest thumping they play right into the hands of NS at UNGA! Smart move from Pak POV, but a real dumb move otherwise.
I actually think all your above points are counter-productive.
And lastly, blaming Pakistan is the most stupidest thing we can do.
Try saying that when the Taliban attacks your army .@mods please change tittle of thread. Attack on occupying army cannot be classifed as terror attack
Modi's attempt to bring up Baluchistan and Pakistani held Kashmir was a melancholic blunder. Surely he was critically under pressure with the civilian unrest in the valley and tried to equal the game, without realizing the psychological advantage Pakistan enjoys in the Indian side and India do not in the Pakistani side. This attack is a roundabout response from Pakistan that situation in Baluchistan or West Kashmir is not same as Indian Kashmir.
And what made Modi suddenly concerned of human rights issue in Baluchistan or kashmir? Its the popular unrest in the valley, isn't?
This is yet another RAW sponsored act to divert attention from UN's assembly's proceedings on Indian occupied Kashmir.Check the history, every time bilateral or international efforts has been taken to restore peace between two countries, India's intelligence agencies stage such incidences.
Modi's attempt to bring up Baluchistan and Pakistani held Kashmir was a melancholic blunder. Surely he was critically under pressure with the civilian unrest in the valley and tried to equal the game, without realizing the psychological advantage Pakistan enjoys in the Indian side and India do not in the Pakistani side. This attack is a roundabout response from Pakistan that situation in Baluchistan or West Kashmir is not same as Indian Kashmir.