16 Buddhist stupas found at Nateshwar Bangladesh

[bongbang]

They can't because there are citations within that post.

I checked it before the lines you posted had no valid citations. But some lines can be found in that book.

 

[alaungphaya]

This is hypothetical scenario. The world didnt turn upside down by countering a Burmese argument. I know my Chittagong bros are more patriot Bangladeshi but you have to understand why Im saying this. So counter the Burmese argument if you can. My agenda is to to take back full Bengal, in which Arakan is an essential part if you didnt get that please spare me.

If somebody is trolling with idiotic posts, this is not how you counter him. Rather show him proper facts, i.e. -

King Narameikhla (1404-1434), or Min Saw Mon, ruler of the Kingdom of Mrauk U in the early 15th century, after 24 years of exile in Bengal, regained control of the Arakanese throne in 1430 with military assistance from the Sultanate of Bengal. The Bengaliswho came with him formed their own settlements in the region.[2] Narameikhla ceded some territory to the Sultan of Bengal and recognised his sovoreignity over the areas. In recognition of his kingdom's vassal status, the kings of Arakan received Islamic titles, despite being Buddhists, and legalised the use of Islamic coins from Bengal within the kingdom. Narameikhla minted his own coins with Burmese characters on one side and Persian characters on the other. Arakan remained subordinate to Bengal until 1531.[2]

Kingdom of Mrauk U - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

They will troll with half facts but if you counter them with these wiki links they will say anyone can edit these wiki pages. That is why I posted a link of the book posted in the wiki page.

They can't because there are citations within that post.

It's like watching two midgets arguing over who is the tallest. Or two monkeys fighting over a banana.

Anyway, when you two have done arguing over which is more right, a pro-Burmese academic or Wikipedia, I'll remind you both Chittagong, a Bengali city founded by Bengalis, and its surrounding area was once ruled by the Buddhist Arakanese.

See ya

 

[bongbang]

It's like watching two midgets arguing over who is the tallest. Or two monkeys fighting over a banana.

And it must be your whole life story. Fighting for bananas

Anyway, when you two have done arguing over which is more right, a pro-Burmese academic or Wikipedia, I'll remind you both Chittagong, a Bengali city founded by Bengalis, and its surrounding area was once ruled by the Buddhist Arakanese.

See ya

Whole Chittagong/Arakan and Bangla was once Buddhist. Retard. Buddhist Rakhines never ruled anything in Bengal Chittagong they were known as notorious pirates Mughs. On other side Buddhist Arakanese were tributary state of Bengal.

 

[Species]

This may help!