Bang Galore
ELITE MEMBER
- Joined
- Feb 21, 2010
- Messages
- 10,685
- Reaction score
- 12
- Country
- Location
as I said earlier people lyk u nvr fail to amaze me...
Some people amaze easily.
now in a logic that people lyk u understand , the girl was punished and debarred from the school for wearing a tilak on her head, what would the school principal do if she finds a boy in the school with a chalk powder on his forehead?? it surely looks like vibudhi from shiv temple, does he get debarred too ??
You are assuming punishment but even of that were true, it would be silly to compare. The girl should have just wiped the tilak & gone to school or her parents should have and it also seems to be a case of wearing hairpins which i assume are prohibited for safety reasons.
the op says the girl was made to stand outside the principal room under the sun for 2 hrs, it dsnt say if she was made to stand within the corridors where there is shade or smewhere where the girl couldn't find no shade.. Unless you are an architect of the school, I am not sure how could u press hard that she was not made to stand under the sun.
Problem is that you either can't (or can't be bothered to) read or simply don't understand. Little wonder you are amazed. this is what the article said:
An 11-year-old girl in Telangana was allegedly made to stand for two hours outside her school principal's room as punishment for wearing a "tilak" on her birthday.
11-Year-old Girl Punished in School for Wearing 'Tilak' on Her Birthday
Nowhere in the article does it say she stood outside in the sun. That you presumably got from elsewhere. I don't have to be an architect to say that, just need not to have blinkers on.