What's new

10 terrorists entering India: The real story behind the alert from Pakistan

US admits it lacks evidence to convict $10m Hafiz Saeed - Telegraph

At a regular briefing, Mark Toner, State Department spokesman, was forced to clarify its position, pointing out the reward was for evidence that could be used to secure a conviction.

"We all know where he is. Every journalist in Pakistan and in the region knows how to find him. But we're looking for information that can be usable to convict him in a court of law," he said.

However, he admitted that so far the US lacked proof that would withstand judicial scrutiny "There is information, there is intelligence that is not necessarily usable in a court of law," he said.




Obviously, you were quick on your finger and forgot US state department revised their 10 million bounty offer afterwards. But you remained ignorant about that as well. So No Evidence against Hafiz Saeed LOL.
So the US state department put a bounty of $10 million USD on some random guy of the street who totally has done nothing wrong, honest.
 
So the US state department put a bounty of $10 million USD on some random guy of the street who totally has done nothing wrong, honest.

No evidence then eh ? to proof Hafiz Saeed did what You or India claimed he did ?
 
Just like many will claim OBL was an innocent man but we all know the truth.

So Sartaj Aziz claims Indian Raw involvement becomes bogus and rubbish in your and your 90 percent gang eyes but somehow Hafiz Saeed 10 million bogus bounty just as Sartaj Aziz bogus Info becomes a holy grail for all of you.

Try harder next time. Your selective arguments presented as absolute facts are becoming boring
 
So Sartaj Aziz claims Indian Raw involvement becomes bogus and rubbish in your and your 90 percent gang eyes but somehow Hafiz Saeed 10 million bogus bounty just as Sartaj Aziz bogus Info becomes a holy grail for all of you.

Try harder next time. Your selective arguments presented as absolute facts are becoming boring
Has the US placed a bounty (of any form) on the head of those Indians claimed to be involved in nerfarious activites inside Pakistan?

There's nothing selective in my arguments.
 
That's cool, Pakistan should keep giving bharat intel to keep her agencies fit and healthy, at-least next time her officers will not give lift and cell phones to attackers.
 
What bounty ? Did you read the content of so called bounty itself ?



I'm going to ask same question to you. Did you actually read what this 10 million dollar is for ?

Still waiting for one Indian name that the world has made the equivalent of Hafiz Saeed....whatever you may argue regarding the bounty.

Just like we are still waiting on an Indian equivalent of Abdul Qadeer Khan (as judged by the international community).

Also like we are waiting on any Indian group to be declared a terror organisation like LeT has worldwide.
 
Has the US placed a bounty (of any form) on the head of those Indians claimed to be involved in nerfarious activites inside Pakistan?

There's nothing selective in my arguments.

So has Pakistan has placed its evidences openly about Indian Raw involvement in Pakistan. how come US bounty is holy truth and Pakistani bounty is Shoodar truth ?.
 
Still waiting for one Indian name that the world has made the equivalent of Hafiz Saeed....whatever you may argue regarding the bounty.

Just like we are still waiting on an Indian equivalent of Abdul Qadeer Khan (as judged by the international community).

Also like we are waiting on any Indian group to be declared a terror organisation like LeT has worldwide.

I think your current PM's entry was banned in some countries for unknown reasons.
 
US admits it lacks evidence to convict $10m Hafiz Saeed - Telegraph

Hand him over to India, we will see if India lacks the evidence to prosecute and convict him.

Then you can collect the 10 million dollars from US (which is big money for Pakistan)...its win win.
 
Still waiting for one Indian name that the world has made the equivalent of Hafiz Saeed....whatever you may argue regarding the bounty.

Just like we are still waiting on an Indian equivalent of Abdul Qadeer Khan (as judged by the international community).

Also like we are waiting on any Indian group to be declared a terror organisation like LeT has worldwide.

This discussion is about Pakistani claims about Raw Involvement Vis a vis US claims about Hafiz saeed involvement as absolute fact. Dont change the subject of the discussion.

This means there are not enough concrete evidence to prosecute Hafiz Saeed not to be confused with a clean chit to Pakistan. Which you tried to convey in this post.

So no concrete evidences means All indian claims about ISI this ISI that are rubbish. Thank you for confirming.
 
This discussion is about Pakistani claims about Raw Involvement Vis a vis US claims about Hafiz saeed involvement as absolute fact. Dont change the subject of the discussion.

Nope you changed the subject rather limited it to evidence implicating Hafiz Saeed.
 
Nope you changed the subject rather limited it to evidence implicating Hafiz Saeed.

I was drawing the analogy. Which I successfully showed that what good for goose must be good for gander as well. Selective arguments and facts which suits your purpose must not be brought into an argument.


He was ready to turn himself to US consulate so 10 million dollars can be spent in Balochistan relief activities. Why didnt US took him in then ?
 
Back
Top Bottom