10 captives, Over 20 soldiers, including Commanding Officer killed at Galwan border clash with China

[CIA Mole]

US tellls india: "ok we u can do this, we will support u with media"

 

[RIP Pak LAW]

China has suggested 43 casualties which could be any number between dead & crucially injured

Keep your 'suggested' part with yourself and spare us from false news here. Its clearly India media/Govt which is claiming/suggesting 43 so called Chinese causalities count.

 

[Gripen9]

So 900 soldiers from both sides involved in a physical melee? 20+ deaths result of fisticuffs...

 

[Ultima Thule]

China has around 300 nukes.

More then enough to destroy Indian cities

 

[GDP Adil Khan Niazi]

No international media stating Chinese casualties but only indian media or some twitter states that both have casualties which is suspected (twitter accounts)

And all those Chinese sources including Wang Wenmen and others are citing Indian media as sources to Chinese casualties, HAHA poor Indians (China, India kay peechay, India, China kay peechay, too much fun!)

https://twitter.com/x/status/1272815324727922688

 

[Ali_Baba]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1272986326183194624

Well, now that he is retired, he has found lost of courage. No so easy in real life.

 

[Yankee-stani]

Man this is the first time I saw this guy man he is s..ting his pants

 

[Zohair Alam]

I wonder which side of the fence the Zionists are sitting on. Haven't heard much from them.

The fenceless Zionists?

https://twitter.com/x/status/1272986326183194624

Because it's China.

 

[crankthatskunk]

I wonder which side of the fence the Zionists are sitting on. Haven't heard much from them.

They are not stupid to jump in to someone else's fire.

 

[Signalian]

More than 900 troops on each side were involved in a physical clash, which started Monday night, lasted several hours---in three phases---and ended on early hours of Tuesday. Most of the deaths have occurred as soldiers fell-off cliffs during a physical fight in the narrow Galwan valley into the river at an altitude of 15,000 feet. Some died due to hypothermia and other due to injuries.

---

Troops of the 16th battalion of the Bihar Regiment noticed this fresh military post near patrol point 14 and asked the Chinese to vacate. The number of Indian Troops was greater than the Chinese on the spot, a clash ensued. The PLA sent in reinforcements another clash ensued.



https://www.tribuneindia.com/news/nation/20-indian-soldiers-dead-in-clash-with-china-100018

This news report shows incompetency of Indian Army on all levels.

1. More than 900 troops on each side were involved in a physical clash -
Seems more of an MMA clash in which the physically fit and hand-to-hand combat trained PLA army came on top. What is IA hand to hand combat training doctrine ?
IA deployed an infantry battalion in this clash after all OR does IA need elite paratroopers fight PLA infantry in physical combat?

2. Most of the deaths have occurred as soldiers fell-off cliffs during a physical fight in the narrow Galwan valley into the river at an altitude of 15,000 feet. Some died due to hypothermia and other due to injuries -
This shows that PLA soldiers used superior tactics by cornering IA soldiers, just like the shepherd pushes his flock towards the paddock, and PLA soldiers pushed IA troops off the cliff.
Secondly, abysmal medical readiness in Indian ranks.
Thirdly, hypothermia ? clothing material of IA troops uniform and boots in wet conditions is questionable.

3. Stones, Steel poles, bamboo poles with nails embed on them, were used by the Chinese, to attack the Indian troops. -
No Army comes to war unprepared. PLA was prepared, IA was not prepared for this clash, IA went in without a plan or a strategy.

4. The Peoples’ Liberation Army (PLA) of China, have also suffered fatal casualties. There is no number to their casualties. -
Number of wounded in 900 troops taking part in combat should be more than fatalities.
Why isnt the report talking about any wounded on PLA side and jumping to fatal causalities straightway?
Is this because IA wounded have died so now report has to mention PLA fatalities somehow since 20 IA troops have been killed ?

5. The number of Indian Troops was greater than the Chinese on the spot, a clash ensued. The PLA sent in reinforcements another clash ensued -
This shows incompetency of the highest level.
Firstly, if IA troops were more than PLA troops initially, why didnt IA take advantage of this situation when the clash had ensued?
Secondly, PLA brought reinforcements, where were IA reinforcements ?

 

[GumNaam]

@GumNaam What Islam should do in such scenario?

Its a God sent opportunity...Islam teaches to show no mercy for those who picked a fight with us and tried to create a fitna. We should follow China's example and cross the LOC with full force.

 

[PAKISTANFOREVER]

I wonder which side of the fence the Zionists are sitting on. Haven't heard much from them.

Why would they care? Is it even relevant to them? Does it affect them.

 

[-blitzkrieg-]

i thought they were using sticks and stones.

 

[Mumm-Ra]

Think about it: If you lost 20+ soldiers and a Colonel in hand to hand fight then imagine yourself fighting with Pakistan army with sniper and rifles and other artillery guns.

btw baat tou GD Bakshi ki theak hai yeh bandooken diwali per chalanay kay liye rakhi hain? kiyu nahi lartay bhai ap log? dartay ho? ya china kay kanray ho? nahi matlab itni khamoshi ki koi wajah honi chahiye na?:

https://twitter.com/x/status/1272986326183194624

That guy is a crackpot and has become a caricature of a right wing armchair gen. to simply stay relevant in the news and be invited to talk shows

 

[Blue In Green]

More then enough to destroy Indian cities

Not directing this at you just wanted to say this is as a general statement.

I don't buy it for even one second that China only has "300 nukes"....Who in their mind would think that the worlds second (arguably first) world power only has 300 damn nukes lmao.

It's like some kind of cruel joke....