Google it you find ans . And post if you have information . Denial is not the way . See the way of discussion is to put fact and accept truth . Please google total flying hour for jf 17 , you come across a no. of sites .
Even gambit admit it that without flcc manual control is tiring . FLCC use...
Ok , Now I come to know your standard . And you are accepting that you people lie on PDF . Also information I give you is available on net on various sites . You can goggle it . Actually you do not have any information , not able to accept truth . I actually give treatment to people like you ...
Only those who do not have arguments/ information increase their voice and use abusive language . I think you as civilise . If you have different information with proof , please come on . Post it . Why so shy to share . I read it on PDF and searching the exact post .
Indian navy say Tejas mark 1 navy is not suited for carrier operation because it donot fit in operational criteria made by Indian navy .
However Tejas mark 1 navy continue to develop as a prototype vehicle to showcase technology used in Tejas mark 2 navy with the backing of navy .
This all are...
Yes sir non quad fbw is more tiring , more attentive , pilot has less time to focus no weapon system . Also non quad fbw usually used in plane which are non rss .
You are right block 2 has lot of improvement in avionics . But fbw is not avionics . It is basic aircraft system . I am not not...
You are right that if flcs contain above concept , manual flight is not tiring . But jf 17 is total manual except pitch so it is tiring to fly . I am not saying that it can not have quad fbw in future . It may very well come , but at present it is not . This is the fact . What I can do in it .
I am free , so reading PDF and enjoying it . I think they should not ban me , after all I m putting just simple facts from PDF itself .
These all Tejas are prototypes or lps not production version . Even lps flying 7 flights per day if needed .
So simple you have 70 jf 17 for at least 5 year with 10 to 20,000 flying hour . Calculus your self . All data from PDF . Actually it is very low and show low availability, high maintenance prone , high vulnerability prone unrated rd 93 with very low mtbo and very low total life .
Ok jf 17 has quad redundant all axis fly by wire . Please support your claim with a authentic link . Actually flying a quad fbw plane is hand free job and flying a plane with out same is too tiring to be sustained for long duration i.e you can fly Tejas for 2 hr but jf 17 for 45 min so this is...
There are many interested , even Bahrain invited us again . But we first to fulfill our demand . And after so much hala gula, proposal for kick back , under table tactics , free j 7 for each jf17 , how much order you able to secure ?
AMCA degine is ready with stealth, with 1:1 module going for...
You even donot know about the air frame of Tejas and talking about its shortcomings, that is wonderfull . It is your motto to criticise, but before that please get your knowledge up to the mark . And please donot hide your identity . If you want to criticise, do it openly , why ashamed of your...
Actually It is very confusing for Pakistan . From su35 to f35 to f22 to j20 to j31 all are available from respected countries, standing in que with compulsion and now Pakistan is so alone to decide.
Bahrain air show it is on you tube . You can see .
Please provide a single link for radar , carbon composite and fly by wire source you mentioned . Please get your basics done up to the mark . Donot put heavy weighted words , put sources of your claim .
Actually we want these type of reactions from side . It is proofs of our achievement . Tejas is way better in each of aspects from jf 17 . And I am not here to change your mind . You can believe what you want . However when you come across any single aspect , how little it may be , in which jf...
Act
Actually jf 17 fly hour / plane / year is 70 hr on an average , much less than rafale and Tejas 250 hr / plane / year .
And please give the detail in w