lol if a PDF think tank posts like that no wonder you need additional armor to claim your facts right...
on topic: the chopper gonna crash or not is not an issue here but the usage of it.. IAF retiring them cuz apache is coming.
lol. now isolation has become a generic word isn't it? isolation cannot be measured by keeping someone at bay but making them pay.. ( now who is paying what , is a question to think about)
what if a production line is shifted to pakistan would you reject it because nothing more is left there to upgrade be it with block 52 or 60 leave alone block 70.. now dont tell me you already have the infra or know how...
secondly MMRCA is / was all about RAfael ( these F16 if selected is...
if pakistani awam is so frustrated then why don't the GoP take a firm stand. who is stopping you to say BIG NO to US.
on one hand you don't need assistance from US and ends up saying you gonna milk US. first be firm with your stance.
pakistan always come strong when it comes to kashmir... but the point is , is it enough to expose democratic India in front of entire world or is it easy to find hide outs of Bin laden type of masss murderer inside pakistan. now you decide which is the best way to expose a country ..
you mean to say drone attacks, do this and that kinda thing..( reality check is needed)
on topic: India has lot to offer to US and with growing economy relation between US and India will go high. Pakistan is the victim of its own wrong doings and blaming US is evident to hide the failures.
if your above mentioned statement is meant to get some thumbs up rating then yes you got it right... but hey to be honest you need to spend some more time in google to get your facts crystal clear.
well i must admit . you really have a nice sense of humor. forget LCA and HAL for a moment .. and give a gentle thought to your air strength... if you still remember those second hand F16 with decades old tech flying in pakistani airspace then i must say we are in better shape.
and one more...
well its not India but Pakistan who has to learn from its mistake and stop fooling yourself by posting such comments. and do you really think we have to learn from you in any sense?? i guess no a BIG no... ( India is not pakistan in any sense)
As far as defense deal or economic ties are...
well its not childish but a genuine question.
i know about SCS and CPEC , you better read my post properly.:haha::haha: don't be in hurry to reply anyone without understanding the context.
change is quite visible my friend but it seems you are clueless at this point of time.. for US supporting India's bid for membership first , there are 48 countries and US is one of them and mind you rest all 47 are sovereign country with independent foreign policy unlike pakistan.
fuuny isn't it???
pakistan now goona take a neutral stance on SCS i mean really???( haan bhi nahi aur naa bhi nahi) :haha::haha::haha: kya hoga CPEC ka ...
and for india's stance on SCS, you better ask chinese what are they doing in indian ocean.( and not to forget in your so called gwadar...
well their application for membership was rejected. and its not about their national interest but their week records against proliferating nuclear technology causing hindrance to get the membership of MTCR ( if i am not mistaken).. and sorry to tag you again n again.. Thanks
but international geopolitics slightly differ from your point of view . if this is the case then china ( an emerging economic power) should have been the member of MTCR .
there is no doubt about the changing geopolitical scenario , anything can happen but past records can not be altered or changed no matter how you present your case. optimism is good but exaggeration leads to downfall.