No you proved nothing. You contradicting yourself, chancing the subject, chancing the definition i am bothered. So these behaviors sums up the case for me. Adios to you.
My source about TB2 isn't being MALE class UAV is your first post which you have defined MALE class requirements. Yes, TB2...
In that post, you defined MALE class as a ''Medium Altitude; 30000 ft, Long Endurance; 24+ hr'' after that you claimed TB2 fulfills these requirements and after that you claimed ''The only reason we are calling it tactical so far is to differentiate it from ANKA''. I just haunting these...
No no no i didn't attacked him, i just brought one simple fact that even Baykar advertise it's products op. altitude as 22-23K so how he can say ''it satisfies all the requirements of MALE class'' and ''The only reason we are calling it tactical so far is to differentiate it from ANKA.''
He is...
Even Baykar claims TB2's operational altitude as 22-23K feet yet you are speaking this decisive LOL. And that's what the company claims BTW, so don’t even get me started on real operational numbers of TB2. Usually i wouldn't bother about BS posts but since you have professional tag this forum...
80 yıldır ezilen Kürtçülük hayat buldu.
Demokratik hak verme adı altında bu coğrafyanın en ulusal bilince sahip halkı yaratıldı.
Tek parti muhatap alınarak Kürtlerin siyasi gücü açığa çıkarıldı.
Şehirler ve propaganda yolları örgüte serbest bırakılarak Kürtler, örgüte, Kürtçülüğe...
I am not saying this is the turret i expect on Altay.
I just said we will see a little shaped turret. Not fully shaped, but also not fully flat.
That's my expectation.
And i don't know the add-on armor but i am sure side armor will look like different than prototype.