What's new

Rostec says UAE in talks for Su-35

Yes Qatar is seriously reconsidering the Rafale, but it will not go for the EF because of not only it's unreliability, but it's American components as well. This is where EF messed up very badly. IF One were to buy an a/c, why buy one with US components? Why NOT buy an American one?
the defect is only minor for the typhoon. there not much thats American. its mostly european.

your mentality is strange. if something has american parts and it does not work why get it when you can just get wholly American things. thats weird.

name one thing on the typhoon thats american thats does not work?
 
no i meant having an air superiority jet will change your air force tactics and will need to build new infrastructure on land plus uae is going to wait a lil bit if they need it as the SU-35 production line is very busy , anyway lets see what UAE will settle down for , i hope you will pick the best choice for your needs
Infrastructure on land is not an issue, keeping the Russian birds is. One also has to consider the after-sales support, and the Russians are no where near their western counterparts.

the defect is only minor for the typhoon. there not much thats American. its mostly european.

your mentality is strange. if something has american parts and it does not work why get it when you can just get wholly American things. thats weird.

name one thing on the typhoon thats american thats does not work?

Either you are trolling me or you haven't understood what I'm trying to say.

1) EF has American parts. Rafale comparatively has next to nothing. The American parts are NOT part of the EF's technical issues. The fact that in the event of hostilities, American parts can be denied is.

2) EF - Technical issues - all the way from cracks in the fuselage, to fuel tanks falling off. For an aircraft that has been in service for so long, this should not be happening. It's not like it achieved FOC last year.

I hope I have made myself clear, and that there are no doubts left.
 
Infrastructure on land is not an issue, keeping the Russian birds is. One also has to consider the after-sales support, and the Russians are no where near their western counterparts.



Either you are trolling me or you haven't understood what I'm trying to say.

1) EF has American parts. Rafale comparatively has next to nothing. The American parts are NOT part of the EF's technical issues. The fact that in the event of hostilities, American parts can be denied is.

2) EF - Technical issues - all the way from cracks in the fuselage, to fuel tanks falling off. For an aircraft that has been in service for so long, this should not be happening. It's not like it achieved FOC last year.

I hope I have made myself clear, and that there are no doubts left.
firstly im not trolling you, just get that out of the way.

in regards to american parts, i doubt the us will reject sale of equipment of equipment to the eu especially to the uk, its just fantasy.

the cracks are minor as i said before, its Germany's problem. they have been deficiencies which will be ironed out in the tranche 3a typhoon.
 
thats why Russia was offering Su 35 to pak as what pak gets Gulf gets tooo.. a thread was posted on the topic before... @Khafee
 
firstly im not trolling you, just get that out of the way.

in regards to american parts, i doubt the us will reject sale of equipment of equipment to the eu especially to the uk, its just fantasy.

the cracks are minor as i said before, its Germany's problem. they have been deficiencies which will be ironed out in the tranche 3a typhoon.
Thank you for that clarification.

Well you are right on the American parts to the EU , but the thing is there is a thing called "end user license" meaning IF today the US didn't want Pakistan to get the EF, they could simply refuse the parts or cancel the license, and the EU would be unable to export the aircraft. Same goes for parts after an aircraft has been delivered.

thats why Russia was offering Su 35 to pak as what pak gets Gulf gets tooo.. a thread was posted on the topic before... @Khafee
There is safety in numbers :-)
 
Back
Top Bottom