What's new

Muslims, Christians sons of Ram, those who don't believe it should leave India: BJP minister

Libtards assume intellectual capacity depends on the level of command of English language.

Modi's command of the English language is nothing to write home about, yet many of us supported him and still support him. So it has nothing to do with that.
 
Then you indulge in the same mud slinging as them and that makes you very little superior in the eyes of the reader.

The level of readership is not much to go by if one sees the responses. The level of discourse has been nasty long before we came along and it is going to be nasty for a long time to come.
 
In Hinduism the Supreme Being/ Supreme spirit doesn't sit in Heaven meting out rewards and punishments, but, instead, is present in all creatures. Rather than being a pantheistic religion, Hinduism is panentheistic because god, as an ever-changing Being, is present in everything.


Creation, protection and destruction, the chief functions/roles of the Supreme Being, are represented to Hindus by three gods, the triad of Brahma, Vishhnu, and Shiva.

Some explain these three gods as manifestations of the Supreme Being; others insist that they are independent.

These gods in turn have their own incarnations of different forms hence, the large pantheon of Hindu deities like Ram for example.

Most hindus believe these large group is their window towards supreme being but never realises ever in their life that the supreme being is inside them.... itself.

Interesting thought , Isnt it?

Well, it only reaffirms the idea that a supreme being that is omnipresent and essentially ensures the existence and continuation of life exists. Certainly not one that sits in heaven.

But dont rewards or punishments exist in Hinduism as well?
 
Modi's command of the English language is nothing to write home about, yet many of us supported him and still support him. So it has nothing to do with that.

Modi spoke extempore much better than you would. Anyway, I was addressing the general assumption among a particular crowd which equates speaking polished English with intellectual strength. Also the assumption in your post that being a Hindu saint equates to being an imbecile.
 
Well, it only reaffirms the idea that a supreme being that is omnipresent and essentially ensures the existence and continuation of life exists. Certainly not one that sits in heaven.

But dont rewards or punishments exist in Hinduism as well?
I do not think there is a set reward or set punishment. Otherwise Pandavas would have been in heaven but from what I read they are in hell :lol:
 
Well, it only reaffirms the idea that a supreme being that is omnipresent and essentially ensures the existence and continuation of life exists. Certainly not one that sits in heaven.

But dont rewards or punishments exist in Hinduism as well?


That is explained as Karma..

karma.JPG
 
In Hinduism the Supreme Being/ Supreme spirit doesn't sit in Heaven meting out rewards and punishments, but, instead, is present in all creatures. Rather than being a pantheistic religion, Hinduism is panentheistic because god, as an ever-changing Being, is present in everything.


Creation, protection and destruction, the chief functions/roles of the Supreme Being, are represented to Hindus by three gods, the triad of Brahma, Vishhnu, and Shiva.

Some explain these three gods as manifestations of the Supreme Being; others insist that they are independent.

These gods in turn have their own incarnations of different forms hence, the large pantheon of Hindu deities like Ram for example.

Most hindus believe these large group is their window towards supreme being but never realises ever in their life that the supreme being is inside them.... itself.

Interesting thought , Isnt it?

Hindus know and realize that the supreme being is inside them, infact they are the supreme being. But the moment someone claims they are, I see Hindus like you going all red in your face.
 
Hindus know and realize that the supreme being is inside them, infact they are the supreme being. But the moment someone claims they are, I see Hindus like you going all red in your face.

If i am myself part of supreme being, i dont need to appease any medium or any other form to reach out to the supreme being.
I have to be truthful to myself only.

Am i wrong , if i apply that logic?
 
That is explained as Karma..

So essentially, this supreme being has a system in place whereby his creations/life is rewarded or punished. If we leave the re-incarnation or form bits out. Karma, is essentially a system of rewards and punishments where essentially a being( in this a human) may go to a higher place (heaven) or end up in a lowly form and miserable(hell).
 
If i am myself part of supreme being, i dont need to appease any medium or any other form to reach out to the supreme being.
I have to be truthful to myself only.

Am i wrong , if i apply that logic?

No, you are not wrong. That is why there is no law stipulating compulsory worship. All worship done is only to fulfill human needs. It is our need that is being addressed when we go to temples and worship. The need in us to connect back to the whole we came from.
 
Modi spoke extempore much better than you would. Anyway, I was addressing the general assumption among a particular crowd which equates speaking polished English with intellectual strength. Also the assumption in your post that being a Hindu saint equates to being an imbecile.

No need to get defensive. Now it seems you are the one putting English as a prerequisite. He has used a teleprompter whenever he has spoken in English, not that there is anything wrong with that.

I did not assume that being a Hindu saint equates to being an imbecile. However being a Hindu saint does not necessarily qualify you to be a minister. Religion and governance are two different things and should be kept separate.
 
So essentially, this supreme being has a system in place whereby his creations/life is rewarded or punished. If we leave the re-incarnation or form bits out. Karma, is essentially a system of rewards and punishments where essentially a being( in this a human) may go to a higher place (heaven) or end up in a lowly form and miserable(hell).

No, there is no concept of heaven and hell. We have a form of purgatory which is temporary. Cause and effect is built into the fabric of the cosmos and is essentially to maintain its balance. Hell and heaven are on earth and not elsewhere.
 
No, you are not wrong. That is why there is no law stipulating compulsory worship. All worship done is only to fulfill human needs. It is our need that is being addressed when we go to temples and worship. The need in us to connect back to the whole we came from.


Thats the whole point. These sadhus and self proclaimed protectors of Hinduism needs clamp down pushing their views on others throat.

Nothing is compulsory and nobody needs anybody to tell what they should do to be a good Hindu or a good citizen .
 
Back
Top Bottom