What's new

UPA's Pink Revolution Makes India World's Biggest Beef Exporter

.....and greek laws trace their origin back to an earlier civilization and pagan religion. Point is that the morality, ethics, laws of today are not made in vacuum.



..... yes it is ALSO part of my sanskrithi ....... asura vadh is a long tradition in the protection of dharma :D

As dear Amit Shah said, the days of responding with swords and arrows are over. Today we press a button ...or a lot of them :P
as dear raj thakarey said,punge bajao lungi bhagoa....better stay safe in kumbai,otherwise chiva chena activists will do asura vadham on you and yours family...


....but that would destroy his "secularism" . We can't have that. Sonia Gandhi specifically told them so. :angel:
y
 
Most of the current laws trace their origin to Roman and Greek laws.



Is not Malayalam made of 90% Sanskrit? So why this terror of Sanskrit? It will take just knowing 10% more words to be a master in Sanskrit.
thats not entirely true....yes..around 80% of high literature malayalam is from Sanskrit,thats only using in poems and literatures,not in the speaking malayalam .....50-60% of speaking Malayalam words are common with tamil and remaining from Sanskrit...its more close to tamil than Sanskrit...even many times Tamil and Malayalam are mutually intelligible....
personally,i am not a Sanskrit hater..but i hate those peoples who are thinking Sanskrit is superior than their mother tongue...

She has already indicated earlier in this same thread....... how old are you ?



For the establishment of Dharma which is the duty of every Hindu. :angel:
i am an atheist,though born in a Christian family....

i dont know how old you are but do you think by talking like this,you make a difference?
24...
appa, ungalukku ellaam enna venumnaalum eluthalaam..engalukku elutha koodatha???ithu enna niyayam??...avanoda postaa koncham parungo..ithavida kevalama eluthiruken antha sottai thalaiyan...avanukellaam intha mathiri pathal sonnaal thaan theriyum...
 
Last edited:
thats not entirely true....yes..around 80% of high literature malayalam is from Sanskrit,thats only using in poems and literatures,not in the speaking malayalam .....50-60% of speaking Malayalam words are common with tamil and remaining from Sanskrit...its more close to tamil than Sanskrit...even many times Tamil and Malayalam are mutually intelligible....
personally,i am not a Sanskrit hater..but i hate those peoples who are thinking Sanskrit is superior than their mother tongue...

:lol: .... you have already admitted that 80% of high literature in Malayalam is from Sanskrit. So Sanskrit superiority in malayalam is already established. How many malayalam words in Sanskrit ? :cheesy:

i am an atheist,though born in a Christian family....

No need to tell me you are a christian, that was pretty obvious :P ....but I do appreciate you being honest about it. :tup: Your personal belief is none of my concern. Only your Anti-Hindu stand is my concern.
 
thats not entirely true....yes..around 80% of high literature malayalam is from Sanskrit,thats only using in poems and literatures,not in the speaking malayalam .....50-60% of speaking Malayalam words are common with tamil and remaining from Sanskrit...its more close to tamil than Sanskrit...even many times Tamil and Malayalam are mutually intelligible....
personally,i am not a Sanskrit hater..but i hate those peoples who are thinking Sanskrit is superior than their mother tongue...

No one thinks Sanskrit is superior than their mother tongue, only it is the root of their mother tongue and the root of almost all languages in India and hence a unifyier. The need is to build a common communication language exclusive to India so as to not lose the Indian identity in a globalized world. As we see now, we are importing Western memes in India which are not applicable to India and hence harmful to its social fabric. Ex: Indian men holding hands and standing in close proximity with a feeling of shared brotherhood and friendship is a common feature throughout India. From schools and colleges to office colleagues to gullies and mohallas. No one thought it was bad or there was anything sexual about it. Now with the promotion (not just acceptance) of homosexual cultures, all men holding hands are categorized as gays. Every benign platonic relationship is colored by sexual overtones.
 
:lol: .... you have already admitted that 80% of high literature in Malayalam is from Sanskrit. So Sanskrit superiority in malayalam is already established. How many malayalam words in Sanskrit ? :cheesy:



No need to tell me you are a christian, that was pretty obvious :P ....but I do appreciate you being honest about it. :tup: Your personal belief is none of my concern. Only your Anti-Hindu stand is my concern.
what do you mean by anti hindu stand???
eating beef???

No one thinks Sanskrit is superior than their mother tongue, only it is the root of their mother tongue and the root of almost all languages in India and hence a unifyier. The need is to build a common communication language exclusive to India so as to not lose the Indian identity in a globalized world. As we see now, we are importing Western memes in India which are not applicable to India and hence harmful to its social fabric. Ex: Indian men holding hands and standing in close proximity with a feeling of shared brotherhood and friendship is a common feature throughout India. From schools and colleges to office colleagues to gullies and mohallas. No one thought it was bad or there was anything sexual about it. Now with the promotion (not just acceptance) of homosexual cultures, all men holding hands are categorized as gays. Every benign platonic relationship is colored by sexual overtones.
i do support your cause...but why Sanskrit?? why not hindi?? Sanskrit is already a dead language..no one uses it present,except some kudumis like manthaarathruthi..more over its very hard to digest and may take years to learn basic of it...
hindi is much more easy to study...moreover we can use it in Pakistan,Bangladesh and saudi arabia...
i am not a dravida chauvinist...
 
Last edited:
:lol: .... you have already admitted that 80% of high literature in Malayalam is from Sanskrit. So Sanskrit superiority in malayalam is already established. How many malayalam words in Sanskrit ? :cheesy:



No need to tell me you are a christian, that was pretty obvious :P ....but I do appreciate you being honest about it. :tup: Your personal belief is none of my concern. Only your Anti-Hindu stand is my concern.
don't know exact percentage..but we can find lot of proto dravidian words in Sanskrit...
 
No USA is not a democracy. People do not directly vote for the president. President is chosen by electoral college votes.

Minority right is not absolute. That is defined by consent of the majority. Otherwise, you may as well bring back Mughals. They were minority and their rule was absolute. Likewise, the British, the Dutch, the French, and the Spanish all their imperialism was oppression of majority by minority and their right was absolute.

Reality still has to dawn on you, that minority bullying will not hold. Bringing in Mughalistan in the name of secularism is a pipedream.

They directly vote for the President. Each state is accorded "electoral weightage" which is changed every election based on demographics.
 
i do support your cause...but why Sanskrit?? why not hindi?? Sanskrit is already a dead language..no one uses it present,except some kudumis like manthaarathruthi..more over its very hard to digest and may take years to learn basic of it...
hindi is much more easy to study...moreover we can use it in Pakistan,Bangladesh and saudi arabia...
i am not a dravida chauvinist

Hindi cannot be used precisely because of the reasons you stated. It is a language very similar to what is the national language of Pakistan and also widely spoken in other countries. It is not unique to India and hence Indian identity. If uniqueness is not an issue, then why discard English? Even otherwise Hindi is a young language and has almost no exclusive Hindu (cultural) heft and is also easily giving way to Arabic and English/Western cultural inputs.
 
They directly vote for the President. Each state is accorded "electoral weightage" which is changed every election based on demographics.

Do not talk about things you have no idea about.

From Wiki:

The United States is a federation, with elected officials at the federal (national), state and local levels. On a national level, the head of state, the President, is elected indirectly by the people, through an Electoral College. Today, the electors virtually always vote with the popular vote of their state. All members of the federal legislature, the Congress, are directly elected. There are many elected offices at state level, each state having at least an elective governor and legislature. There are also elected offices at the local level, in counties and cities. It is estimated that across the whole country, over one million offices are filled in every electoral cycle.

Presidential elections[edit]
Main articles: United States presidential election and Electoral College (United States)
The President and the Vice President are elected together in a Presidential election.[9] It is an indirect election, with the winner being determined by votes cast by electors of the Electoral College. In modern times, voters in each state select a slate of electors from a list of several slates designated by different parties or candidates, and the electors typically promise in advance to vote for the candidates of their party (whose names of the presidential candidates usually appear on the ballot rather than those of the individual electors). The winner of the election is the candidate with at least 270 Electoral College votes. It is possible for a candidate to win the electoral vote, and lose the (nationwide) popular vote (receive fewer votes nationwide than the second ranked candidate). Until the Twelfth Amendment to the United States Constitution of 1804, the runner-up in a Presidential election[10] became the Vice President.

Electoral College votes are cast by individual states by a group of electors, each elector casts one electoral college vote. Until the Twenty-third Amendment to the United States Constitution of 1961 the District of Columbia citizens did not have representation and/or electors in the electoral college. In modern times, with electors usually committed to vote for a party candidate in advance, electors that vote against the popular vote in their state are called faithless electors, and occurrences are rare. State law regulates how states cast their electoral college votes. In all states except Maine and Nebraska, the candidate that wins the most votes in the state receives all its electoral college votes (a "winner takes all" system). From 1969 in Maine, and from 1991 in Nebraska, two electoral votes are awarded based on the winner of the statewide election, and the rest (two in Maine, three in Nebraska) go to the highest vote-winner in each of the state's congressional districts.

Final 2012 Presidential Election Electoral and Popular Vote
 
what do you mean by anti hindu stand???
eating beef???

Gau Hatya.

don't know exact percentage..but we can find lot of proto dravidian words in Sanskrit...

It could very well be the proto sanskrit words in the dravidian language. Its pure speculation....... but this is irrelevant. Sanskrit is Sanskriti. It is the mother of almost all Indian language. It tells us our history and the origin of our culture, civilization and society. It is more than just another language.
 
beef-cuts.jpg
 
Back
Top Bottom